Bearly Politics Profile picture
Nov 6, 2024 1 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Right.

I think we can all agree that the proverbial shit has hit the fan in a big way in the United States today, and the splatter will most certainly not be contained in the country that will now soon again be run by someone who is increasingly orange, senile, unhinged and surrounded by a few exceptionally dodgy characters.

Now, for me personally, when the faeces has exploded, the first thing I do is put on my strategist’s* hat (it’s really nice, it has sequins, but still looks serious).

So, with that in mind, let’s all put a plan together. Let’s identify the risks we’re facing now, the actions we can take, and how it may just help our communities not just cope but build resilience over the next four years.

1. Keep Your Sanity by Choosing the Right News 🗞️
Risk: Misinformation and endless chaos can have you second-guessing your morning coffee.
Plan of Action: Stick to high-factuality sources and take headlines with a pinch of salt (or a whole bag, really). Think Byline Times, Full Fact and other trusted news sources.
Why It Helps: You stay informed without feeling like you’re living in an alternative reality. Plus, you’ll have the facts handy when Aunt Margery shares “news” that reads like it was ghostwritten by a feverish badger.

2. Become an Ally (Without the Halo) 👥
Risk: Trumpian rhetoric has a habit of spilling across borders, emboldening certain groups here to act like empathy is some kind of personal failing.
Plan of Action: Show up for vulnerable communities and support the groups on the front lines. Whether it’s Liberty, Stonewall, or Women’s Aid, these groups need our help - and a lot less of our “thoughts and prayers.”
Why It Helps: Empathy builds resilience. Just make sure to avoid the self-congratulatory halo - always remember that protest is about support, not photo-ops.

3. Put Your Keyboard to Good Use 🔍
Risk: Trumpian spin can travel faster than a dodgy headline on Facebook.
Plan of Action: If you see something that stinks of exaggeration, have a polite, fact-based word. Share reputable fact-checks or stats. (And no, “my cousin’s friend” is not a valid source).
Why It Helps: Stopping misinformation in its tracks is like whacking a mole with a hefty fact-check hammer. It doesn’t solve everything, but it stops the spread of some of the worst nonsense, even if it sometimes feels like farting against thunder.

4. Engage in Real Conversation – Yes, Really 🤝
Risk: Trumpian chaos thrives on everyone shouting over each other.
Plan of Action: Whether it’s on Twitter or at the dinner table, try an approach that’s equal parts empathy and questioning. And if you can’t talk, just listen (and pour yourself a very big glass of something very strong while trying to not fall out of your chair from rolling your eyes so hard).
Why It Helps: Constructive discussion can feel rare, but it’s one of the few things that unpicks divisive rhetoric. Plus, fewer people will think you’re just an “anti-Trumper” with an agenda if you show a real interest in their views.

5. Support Local Activism (Even if You Hate Crowds) 📝
Risk: The Trumpian era doesn’t just export policies, it normalises an “every man for himself” approach.
Plan of Action: Support or join local groups that reflect your values. Even if it’s just a few pounds a month to a good cause, your support counts. If crowds aren’t your thing, fundraisers and online petitions work wonders too.
Why It Helps: The fight for decency often happens on a hyper-local level. It’s less about grand gestures, more about consistency.

6. Take “Me Time” Seriously (No Really, Don’t Skimp) 🌱
Risk: Trumpian chaos and 24/7 crisis news can make you feel like you’re living in a warped season of Black Mirror.
Plan of Action: Schedule breaks, mute your doom-scrolling apps now and then, and spend time with your loved ones (including your plants).
Why It Helps: Self-care isn’t self-indulgence; it’s survival. A calm mind is a resilient mind, and nobody fights the good fight well when they’re on their 8th espresso (unless you've reached the point where your body is 40% caffeine).

7. Find Laughter Where You Can (Even if it Feels a Bit Grim) 😜
Risk: The next four years could make the “dark humour” section of your mind overbooked.
Plan of Action: Find moments of humour, however small. Memes, an incisive Twitter comeback, a GIF that nails it - whatever brings a smile and keeps you sane.
Why It Helps: The situation is serious, but our collective sanity doesn’t need to crumble. Humour is like a salve for tough times. Please, let's remember to have a laugh, even though it might not feel like it's appropriate today.

What we need to acknowledge as a community is that the coming years are set to be exceptionally turbulent, and Trumpian politics loves nothing more than a good chaos-fest.

But there's something we have to keep in mind (and I am very much speaking to myself here):

No, we don’t need to absorb every blow or react to every headline.

Instead, we can engage in thoughtful actions, support each other, and - let’s face it - build a little resistance muscle along the way.

We’ll face plenty of fire, but our task is to focus on the things that endure: community, compassion, and (of course) fact-checking like our lives depend on it (which, at times, it may).

Let’s make our way through the noise, support each other, and remember that even Trumpianism, for all its chaos, is a moment in time.

Decency and democracy, if we stay vigilant, are built to last.

*And yes, this was pre-written weeks ago, because I wouldn't be a good strategist if I didn't consider the worst case scenario, would I?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bearly Politics

Bearly Politics Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @i_iratus

Mar 2
I’m sorry, what now?!

You do realise that these “hand-wringing” Europeans have spent the last 70 years turning up to fight America’s wars, right?

Let me take you on a little trip down memory lane - one littered with the wreckage of “American diplomacy” - since your grasp of history seems shakier than Orangina’s grip on a ramp.

Korea? Over 60,000 British troops deployed alongside U.S. forces, along with 5,000 Turks, plus French, Dutch, and Greek contingents. Europeans bled and died on the same battlefields as Americans.

The Gulf War? The UK sent 35,000 troops. France deployed 18,000. Italy, the Netherlands, and others contributed. Europeans stood shoulder to shoulder with the U.S. to push Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait.

Afghanistan? The NATO mission - led at various points by “hand-wringing” European commanders like General Sir David Richards (🇬🇧), General Egon Ramms (🇩🇪), and General Jean-Louis Py (🇫🇷) - saw thousands of British, Dutch, Danish, Polish, and other European troops deployed year after year. Britain alone sent 150,000 troops. A European-led force fought in a war the U.S. started… and then, of course, abandoned, leaving the Taliban to waltz back in.

Iraq? The UK sent 46,000 troops. Poland commanded a whole multinational division with 2,500 of its own. Italy contributed 3,200, Denmark 500. These weren’t token gestures; these were boots on the ground in a war built on lies your government peddled.

So tell me, Lindsey, at what point did “hand-wringing” Europeans stop pulling their weight?

When exactly did they become too weak to “defend their own continent,” given that they’ve spent the last 70 years showing up every time America blundered into another conflict?

Was it when thousands of British, French, Dutch, and Polish troops fought in Helmand, Kandahar, and Kabul?

Or was it when European soldiers were deployed in Iraq to clean up the mess from an invasion the U.S. justified with fabricated intelligence?

Or maybe it was when European nations actually upheld their NATO commitments while Trump had an adolescent tantrum about them and Republicans fell over themselves to kiss Putin’s ring?

It takes a special kind of ignorance to pretend Europe hasn’t fought alongside the U.S. time and time again. But then again, considering how the Republican Party now prefers surrendering to Russia over standing with its allies, maybe this historical amnesia isn’t so surprising after all.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 8
Here’s your regular reminder that diversity includes:

- Disabled people
- People of Colour
- People from working-class backgrounds
- Women
- LGBTQ+ people
- Religious minorities
- Older students returning to education
- Neurodivergent people
- Care leavers
- First-generation university students

If you don’t care about diversity, then you don’t care about ensuring that universities are accessible to talented people from all walks of life.

You don’t care about removing barriers that have historically kept certain groups out of higher education.

You don’t care about competence - because talent exists everywhere, but opportunity doesn’t.

And that, frankly, tells us absolutely everything we need to know about you.Image
Sally-Anna Misinformation Reporter, you keep talking about competence, character, and commitment as if diversity somehow contradicts them. It doesn’t.

Talent exists everywhere.

Opportunity doesn’t.

That’s the problem.

Do you think a working-class student with straight A’s but no family connections or financial backing is less competent than a wealthy student who coasts in through legacy admissions?

Do you think a disabled student who needs accommodations is less committed than someone who never had to face those barriers?

Diversity doesn’t replace merit - it ensures that merit is actually recognised.

Why is that such a problem for you?
If you don’t want to see my posts, best thing you can do is hit the “block” button.

Writing “not interested” is just going to let the algorithm feed you even more of my writing.

Glad I could help.
Read 23 tweets
Oct 29, 2024
Right.

We’ve all by now seen that Axel Rudakubana has been charged with terrorism offences as of today, while at the same time the police have also confirmed that the murders he allegedly committed will not be treated as an act of terror.

Now, on the best of days, that statement would already be putting the misinformation machines into overdrive, and let’s be honest, we’ve not had the best of days.

So on that basis, please allow me to go through a few FAQs.

🔴 Why is the attack not classified as terrorism?

Because the terrorist charges Rudakubana faces don’t involve the murders themselves, but rather other incriminating items discovered, like ricin (a biological weapon) and an al-Qaeda training manual. While these discoveries raise additional questions, the police have chosen not to classify the murders as terror-related at this point.

So, while his case is indeed complex, there’s no sudden shift in classification - nor is it an excuse for vigilantism.

🔴 Is this a case of two-tier justice?

Hardly. The courts are treating each case individually, as they should. Rudakubana is facing severe consequences for his alleged actions, while the rioters face theirs. The justice system isn’t designed to favour one form of criminality over another based on some imagined hierarchy; it’s built to address each crime as it comes.

🔴 Why do you keep using “allegedly” in this context?

It means that, while charges have been filed, the case has not yet been decided in court, and he remains innocent until proven guilty. This is a fundamental principle of justice and one that applies to every case, no matter how grim the allegations.

🔴 Wouldn’t labelling the murders as terrorism be more accurate?

Not necessarily.

Terrorism charges require specific intent and context beyond violence alone. The presence of toxic substances like ricin and extremist materials warrants separate terror charges, but these don’t automatically transform every aspect of his case into “terrorism.” Each charge must meet the legal criteria on its own.

🔴 Why aren’t the murders being classified as terrorism if he’s facing a terrorism charge?

The CPS’s decision not to categorise the murders as terror-related doesn’t minimise their severity; it’s simply a matter of legal definitions. Terrorism charges are tied to actions that specifically aim to coerce or intimidate the public or influence government. If the CPS hasn’t found these motives tied directly to the murders, they wouldn’t be classified as terrorism, but this doesn’t diminish the seriousness of the charges he does face.

🔴 Should far-right rioters be released because they’ve been “proven right”?

No, and here’s why: the severity of Rudakubana’s new charges doesn’t vindicate anyone’s vigilante behaviour. Violence or incitement based on speculation or anger remains illegal. Courts don’t - and shouldn’t - operate on mob rule or emotional retaliation.

Being “proven right” would require not only correctly predicting a suspect’s guilt (which remains unproven) but also somehow justifying riotous street violence as a legitimate response. Spoiler: it isn’t.

🔴 Does the far-right have a right to “stand up” as Patriots of Britain suggests?

Anyone can express their views legally, but rioting and inciting violence aren’t part of “standing up”; they’re crimes. So, no, these charges don’t grant a blank cheque for mobs to wreak havoc or assume justice can be “enforced” on the streets. We don’t get to decide guilt through disorder.

The context to keep in mind is that Rudakubana’s new charges only emphasise the importance of keeping a clear head, letting justice do its work, and refusing to turn tragedy into a licence for revenge or rumour-mongering.

There is so much that still needs to come to light in this absolutely horrific case, and we are going to seriously need to keep our heads about us.
Because more and more statements are coming out, I’ll be adding to this FAQ to further clarify and contextualise the situation:

🔴 Does charging the Southport suspect with terrorism mean Farage was “right all along”?

Not at all.

Farage’s claim oversimplifies a complex case.

The new charges involve alleged possession of ricin and an Al Qaeda-linked manual, discovered through follow-up searches - not through any sudden “revelation” about the attack itself. Law enforcement and the Crown Prosecution Service have clarified that these charges don’t reclassify the attack as terrorism because the initial crime didn’t meet the UK’s terrorism criteria at the time.

Being “right” in Farage’s sense would require not just anticipating new charges but also justifying reckless street violence as a legitimate response.

It’s a convenient narrative, but it doesn’t hold up to scrutiny, especially when the facts demand more than speculative hindsight.
🔴 Have journalists and “lefty commentators” been “made to look incredibly stupid” by this new information?

Not really. Journalists and commentators voiced concerns based on the information available at the time, which didn’t include evidence of terrorism. That’s not “virtue signalling” - it’s how responsible reporting works: engaging with verifiable facts, not speculation.

This isn’t some “gotcha” moment that delegitimises past reporting or calls for due process. It’s a reminder that speculation, particularly when it leads to vigilante responses, only muddies the facts and fuels dangerous narratives.

The emergence of new evidence now doesn’t invalidate fact-based assessments then; it simply shows that cases evolve.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 12, 2024
This is very, very good news.

✅ Greater use of technology.
✅ Shifting care from hospitals to communities.
✅ Moving from sickness to prevention.

And fuck me, I’m going to be very, very busy over the next few years.

Bring it on.

🐻 Image
And for anyone keen on reading the findings by Lord Darzi this is based on, here’s the link (I highly recommend reading at least the Executive Summary):



If there was any doubt that the Tories had spectacularly fucked this country over for the past 14 years, the should completely erase those:assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66e1b49e…Image
Another spine chilling finding summarised is around Maternity Care - the number of inquiries and adverse incidents is just not acceptable in what is supposed to be a developed country. Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 24, 2024
Right.

Somehow, I need to spell out something that should be glaringly obvious to anyone with even the tiniest shred of decency, so on that note, let me get my Explaining Crayons and Understanding paper, because there seems to be a whole lot of confusion about something.

To all of the eunuchoid fuck-monkeys who have been noisily frothing at the maw in the comments in my post below:

Yes, Pumpkin, I do understand the concept of “innocent until proven guilty.”

And yes, Cupcake, I am aware of what it means when a case is sub judice.

However, let's stop bullshitting ourselves right here and now because there’s a world of difference between waiting for a legal verdict and recognising two predatory, exploitative, dangerous fucks for exactly what they are. Andrew and Tristan Tate are a clear, objective and present danger to women and girls, and, no, you do not need a court of law to find them guilty of a crime to see, acknowledge and outright condemn it.

These two arrogant soft-cocks have built their entire empire on the backs of women they’ve exploited, degraded, and treated like disposable commodities. Their words, their actions, and their so-called “businesses” are dripping with misogyny and openly predatory.

When someone brags about having "bottom bitches" earning them money and instructs other men in their "Pimping Ho's Degree" on how to control, dominate and manipulate women to become their vassals, there is absolutely zero need for the slam of a gavel to kind of get the idea that you are dealing with a person who should not be allowed within a 100 miles of a woman.

They have made it their overt mission to normalise a culture of control, violence, and outright hatred towards women, and they’ve done it all while laughing their way to the fucking bank.

Now, I’ve seen some people trying to claim that the Tates have done something positive for young men. Let me be crystal fucking clear about two things:

1. No, they have never done anything good for young men, and if you think they have, then oh boy, you have a bit of self-exploration to do.

2. No man should ever be admired for building up his wealth on the blatant exploitation of women. Ever.

It doesn’t matter the tiniest of blue fucking iotas if they’ve sold themselves as role models, tried to paint themselves as champions of masculinity or even if they have given millions upon millions of pounds to charity. If your role models are two men who make their money by treating women like garbage and openly profess to "owning" them, then you need to reassess who the fuck you’re looking up to, and you need to do it quickly, fast.

And to all the toxic little gormless incels still defending these two in the comments, you’re not just deluding yourself - you’re a walking, talking bright red flag, and you should be forced to wear one in public, so everyone knows you’re a danger to women. Because if you’re still championing these two pieces of shit despite everything we know about them, everything they have belligerently and constantly told us, then you’re not just part of the problem - you are an active participant in it.

I will repeat.

This is not about ignoring due process or jumping to conclusions; it’s about facing the brutal, undeniable truth:

Andrew and Tristan Tate are a menace to women and girls because they have told us this time and time again.

So yes, I will still be condemning these two shit-weasels, their actions, their words and every single person who supports them in full, and no, I will not pretend we need to wait for a court to tell us what we already know.

The Tates are a fucking blight on society, and if you’re still making excuses for them, then you need to take fifteen minutes and try go grow the spine you're so very clearly lacking.
Exhibit 1: Tate Scamming Men.

Exhibit 2: Tate Describing his Business Model.

Read 6 tweets
Aug 3, 2024
Morning, all.

This morning, the people of Sunderland are cleaning up their city after yet another night of targeted right-wing riots. This is the third night this week that we’ve seen far-right thugs infiltrate communities with one goal and one goal only – to cause havoc and sow hateful division. The violence we are witnessing is fuelled by a rather blatant disinformation campaign, and that's precisely why I’m writing this post today (and yes, this is a cup of coffee or tea sit down kind of post, be warned).

Before diving into the specifics, let's clarify the difference between misinformation and disinformation:

🟠 Misinformation is false or inaccurate information that is spread, regardless of intent to mislead. For example, if someone shares an incorrect fact without knowing it’s false, that’s misinformation.

🔴 Disinformation, on the other hand, is deliberately deceptive. It’s the intentional spreading of false information to manipulate public opinion or obscure the truth.

Now, this morning I would like to discuss two ongoing (and very apparent) disinformation campaigns that have poisoned the well of public discourse in ways I've not previously seen, the first one being the disinformation behind the violence and thuggery we've seen on our streets these last few nights.

The Southport Tragedy and Its Exploitation

This week, we witnessed the heinous murder of three young girls in Southport and the injury of nine others. Almost immediately, right-wing agitators kicked off a disinformation campaign, falsely naming the suspect as a Muslim refugee. The suspect, as it turns out, was born in Wales to immigrant parents and isn’t Muslim. This fact was confirmed when the 17-year-old’s name was released. But facts be damned, right? Despite the truth being laid out clearly, the far-right saw an opportunity to fuel their hate-filled agenda.

@tommyrobinson87 and Andrew Tate – two names synonymous with rabble-rousing, violent language and extremism – have been at the forefront, either excusing or inciting violent riots in Southport, Hartlepool, Sunderland, and London. These riots have targeted Muslims and immigrants, groups that had nothing to do with the heinous attack in Southport. Yet, here we are, watching these communities bear the brunt of violence based on outright lies.

@Nigel_Farage, ever the opportunist, has been quick to excuse this behaviour. According to him, we are seeing "a reaction to fear, to discomfort, to unease, that is out there, that is shared by tens of millions of people... What you've seen on the streets of Hartlepool, London of Southport is nothing compared to what could happen over the course of the next few weeks.”

Please, spare me.

Not only content with excusing the Far-Right violence, Farage's ominous warning that “what you’ve seen on the streets... is nothing compared to what could happen” is a blatant attempt to further instil fear and prepare the public for more violence. This is patently not the language of someone seeking to calm tensions or promote peace. Instead, it’s a transparent attempt to fan the flames of division and chaos.

The violent riots on our streets are not about "discomfort" or "fear"; it is purely about capitalising on tragedy to stoke hatred and division. It’s about validating violence against innocent people under the guise of “concerned citizenship.” This narrative must be called what it is: An orchestrated campaign of Far-right Violence and Intimidation, plain and simple.

The Disinformation Campaign Against Imane Khelif

On another front, we have a storm of disinformation swirling around Algerian boxer Imane Khelif at the Paris Olympics. Initially disqualified by the IBA in 2023 for not meeting still unspecified “gender testing” criteria, Khelif was later cleared to compete by the IOC. The IBA, which no longer runs Olympic boxing on the back of some very dodgy dealings, has defended its position but has failed to provide any sort of clarity on what specific gender tests were conducted. This lack of transparency from the IBA raises serious questions about their motives and the integrity of their processes - especially in light of the very real questions about their integrity as an organisation.

Imane Khelif was born a woman, lived as a woman and, for all intents and purposes, is a woman, yet she has been subjected to a smear campaign by those looking to cast doubt on her eligibility and integrity as a tool to further their own transphobic and, let’s be honest, misogynistic agenda - and the comments being flung around are rather telling.

For example, @Glinner's vile comment, “No HE isn't trans. He's just a man. Male puberty, XY chromosomes. Trans activists are pretending otherwise however because they're misogynist scum who would enjoy seeing a woman killed or crippled in the ring,” exemplifies this. Similarly, @ThePosieParker's remark, “Men, with DSDs, in poor countries are scouted by coaches to compete in women’s sports. Everyone knows that they’re men,” are both baseless, inflammatory and perfect examples of the disinformation we have to be so careful of.

The IOC has stringent guidelines to ensure fair competition, and Khelif meets all necessary criteria. But why let facts get in the way of a good outrage, right? This has absolutely nothing to do with the safety of women and everything to do with unjust scrutiny and blatant disinformation aimed at undermining a talented athlete.

The Real-World Consequences of Disinformation

Both these instances – the far-right violence spurred by lies about a murder suspect and the disinformation against Khelif – are stark reminders of the dangers of disinformation. It’s not just about misinformation; it’s about the real-world harm it causes. Innocent people are being targeted, communities are being torn apart, and the fabric of our society is being shredded.

Look back at previous disinformation campaigns in the UK: the false claims about paedophile rings in Hampstead, which led to harassment and threats against innocent people; the misleading information during the Brexit campaign, like the infamous "£350 million for the NHS" bus claim, which has caused deep divisions and ongoing political turmoil; the lies about 5G towers spreading COVID, resulting in arson attacks on telecom infrastructure. These are not just harmless rumours; they have real, often violent, consequences.

We must stop excusing these actions as reactions to fear or unease. We must stop sanitising hate and violence with terms like “concerned citizens.” It’s time to call out disinformation for what it is – a tool used by extremists to manipulate, divide, and destroy, and it’s time to hold those who spread these lies accountable.

If there is one thing that the far-right thugs that have invaded our streets have accidentally right, is that #EnoughIsEnough.
If you're not already following @marcowenjones, he has done a fantastic thread detailing disinformation spread about Southport.

And a very good post detailing further the controversies surrounding Imane Khelif:

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(