Tuesday, an election was held in Kentucky on an issue that occupies the core of every level of the right-wing movement that just dominated the national election.
1/
Both billionaires and far-right special interest groups prioritize this particular issue as paramount.
This issue is the top priority in every gerrymandered statehouse.
It’s a core plank of Project 2025.
Trump himself made it clear it’s a top priority of his.
2/
If a Republican doesn’t toe the line on this issue, he or she will be primaried in the next election, and will likely lose.
And in Kentucky, that issue was up for a vote.
And….
3/
…the right-wing position got absolutely destroyed.
What issue am I taking about?
The effort to push universal private vouchers.
To take money from public schools and send them to private schools.
4/
When the voters actually had a clearly presented choice, in Kentucky, on Tuesday, the issue lost…
65-35!
It lost in EVERY county.
5/
Issue 2, as it was called, fared the worst in the smallest county in Kentucky — losing 74%-26% among the 1,086 voters who voted in Robertson County. Robertson’s county seat is Mt. Olivet, population 347.
6/
And Issue 2 got crushed in the state’s largest county, Jefferson (home to Louisville)—losing 67%-33%.
Issue 2 managed to lose by 70-30 or worse in 8 counties; it lost by 65-35 or worse in 60 counties; it lost by by 60-40 or worse in 111 counties.
7/
The “Yes” vote only topped 40% in 9 counties.
And to dive a little deeper, the question Kentuckians voted No so decisively on was actually framed quite positively for the “Yes” side. Framed in the way that those peddling private vouchers like to frame it:
8/
“To give parents choices in educational opportunities for their children, are you in favor of enabling the General Assembly to provide financial support for the education costs of students in kindergarten through 12th grade who are outside the system of common (public)…”
9/
schools amending the Constitution of Kentucky as stated below?”
The yard signs for Yes on Issue 2 also sounded wonderful: “Putting Students First.”
And still, Issue 2 was absolutely shellacked.
10/
By the way, similar referenda failed in Colorado (52-48) and Nebraska (repealing a voucher bill 57-43).
And all this continues a stunning streak—no referendum establishing universal vouchers has ever won.
11/
I don’t just bring this up to laud the voters of Kentucky for seeing through what has emerged as a scam in state after state, including Ohio.
I bring it up because it tells us something.
12/
Again, the push for universal vouchers is at the heart of the conservative agenda. At all levels, everywhere. And when voters had a direct choice, it got absolutely clobbered across the board.
But universal vouchers are not the only issue where this is the case.
13/
The attack on abortion access is another central plank in the far right’s agenda, and it too was rejected Tuesday. Voters passed seven ballot measures on abortion rights across the country; in Florida, a strong majority voted Yes, but fell short of the 60% threshold.
14/
And beyond universal vouchers and abortion, I think it’s safe to say that almost all the promises made by the far right and in Project 2025 are equally toxic—which is why Trump ran away from most of them so quickly.
15/
But if we were to pull each of them out and demand a referendum on them, my guess they would almost all fare poorly.
All of this is of course frustrating, but also illuminating.
The far right is embracing toxic issues. The people oppose them…strongly.
16/
They vote accordingly when presented with those issues. Yet our candidates struggle to beat the very candidates pushing those policies despite how unpopular they are.
Including in the very states where these toxic policies are being pushed.
17/
In a very simplistic way, this disconnect between the underlying issues and the candidates/parties highlights a gap we must close.
It highlights an opportunity we are clearly not seizing.
18/
There’s so much we need to do to grab that opportunity.
It’s about organizing. Running in more places. The broader brand of the party. What we do when we’re in office—what issues we focus on and fight for, and fight against. And messaging.
19/
Speaking of messaging, I saw some of the ads on Kentucky’s Issue 2 because Northern Kentucky is in the Cincinnati media market. And they were so damn simple. They featured a teacher. And she stated plainly that public money should not be spent on private schools.
20/
They reiterated a simple message: “Public funds for public schools.” Period.
And that won.
21/
Simple. First principles. Common sense.
Appealing to communities across a diverse state, from the largest county to the smallest.
Leveraging inherent trust in public schools and public school teachers.
22/
If it can be done for issues, it should be possible for candidates.
And if we want to turn things around, failure to do this is not an option.
At the highest level, far above the back and forth events of the election cycle (and given how wild the cycle was, it’s hard to see beyond those events right now), all that we’re living through perfectly aligns with the long arc of American history.
1/
And any unvarnished look at that history reveals a clear and brutal pattern—that every time there are advances in growing a diverse democracy, a fierce backlash erupts against that expansion.
Every time.
2/
And the more I understand about the too-overlooked backlash to a more diverse American democracy in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the more disturbed I am by the similarities today.
3/
I so enjoyed knocking on doors Monday in N. Avondale (a D stronghold in Cincinnati).
But one thing haunted me.
The precisely calculated targets I was given largely led me to single-family homes. 1 or 2 adults, w perhaps a voting-age child or 2.
1/
And perhaps an elderly parent.
As I went to these homes, enjoying the conversations, the list I was given had me skipping over large apartment buildings up and down the very same streets.
Each building: Dozens of people. Many doors, units and floors.
2/
Yet not one person on my list to talk to.
One of those buildings had a large courtyard where kids were playing, parents were observing, chatting.
Some good polls yesterday. Some decent ones this morning. Late deciders appear to be trending Kamala Harris’s way.
1/
Let this give you hope.
Do NOT let it make you complacent (and I know those who follow me here wouldn’t let that happen).
If we have momentum, it’s for the same reason we’ve had a winning streak ever since Dobbs. A winning streak that has defied history and polling.
2/
And that reason is that we’ve channeled our outrage into action—grassroots activism wherever and whenever it’s been needed. All of us rowing in the same direction, election after election, year after year, state after state, race after race.
3/
The following statement “Not This Time” was written by my husband Terry’s brother, a life long Republican and retired U.S. Army Lt. Colonel.
1/
We are life long Democrats and our great differences in political views and affiliations have led to mostly not talking about these matters at all, too great a gap.
But NOT THIS TIME!
Cody reached out across this painful gap to share his remarkable conversion…
2/
of viewpoint given the extreme threat to our democracy that he recognizes.
THIS TIME he & his wife will vote for Kamala Harris for President!
This election is tearing some families apart. It is bringing ours together in a totally unexpected new way.
3/
Straight talk from FDR in 1936—captures what we face today
A 🧵
“Freedom, in itself and of necessity, suggests freedom from some restraining power. In 1776 we sought freedom from the tyranny of a political autocracy –
1/
“from the eighteenth century royalists who held special privileges from the crown.
It was to perpetuate their privilege that they governed without the consent of the governed…that they put the average man’s property and the average man’s life…
2/
“in pawn to the mercenaries of dynastic power; that they regimented the people.
And so it was to win freedom from the tyranny of political autocracy that the American Revolution was fought….
3/