Pew Research Center's review of validated voters reveals that Trump won 55% of whites in 2020.
According to the two largest accredited exit polls (AP/NORC and Edison), Trump won 56% and 57% of whites respectively this election.
These figures are of course within the margin of error, but there's no reason (yet) to believe he's losing white voters.
With regard to the college whites, it's true that Trump won fewer of them in 2016 than Romney in 2012. But Trump has been making slow progress in that regard – he's gained a few points each election cycle among this cohort (2016 38%, 2020 42%, 2024 45-46%).
More info on these exit polls. I'm no expert, but I think the Edison one only interviewed voters in 10 states (NBC uses Edison, and NBC claims it only did 10 states), whereas the one Fox News used (AP/NORC) included all 50 states -- and it had nearly a 5x larger sample size.
That said, as you can see in the screenshot above there are other methodological differences between the two, so maybe Edison's is better. But NBC's poll didn't include New York, which is why is showed a 79% Jewish Dem vote nationally when we know Jews shifted rightward in NY.
It's also worth noting that these preliminary exit polls are less exact than the reviews of validated voters that come later. Pew's, for example, was published halfway through 2021.
Here's a thought experiment. Trump comes out against Israel, begins parroting all of the weepy pro-Palestine talking points you see on here – who votes for him? Who donates to him? Virtually no one, because there's no electorate for this right of center in America.
I'm sure Trump also has a generally positive impression of conservative Jews and Israel, so it isn't some cynical move on his part. But the idea that he's "owned" by a foreign government is ridiculous. It's just Russiagate for 95 IQ internet anti-Semites.
If you want less foreign aid across the board and less US involvement in the Middle East, then great, I do too. If your politics put you at odds with most American Jews, who are overwhelmingly liberal, then we're in the same boat. But consider this:
Yeah real shame the Constitution is an obstacle to the whole “import trillions of third worlders to vote for more left-wing tyranny” thing. Better scrap it.
The article characterizes the Constitution as “antidemocratic” (half true, and a good thing) but then laments the threat it poses to American democracy
If our founding document isn’t democratic, then that raises serious questions about the nature and origin of American democracy
Will the Democrats replace Joe Biden? After last night, it’s obvious that many would certainly like to.
But here’s why that is unlikely to happen.
🧵🧵🧵
First off, Biden won 99% of the pledged delegates to the convention, where they are obligated to support him – unless he willingly steps down.
The DNC also still appears to be moving forward with its plan to nominate Biden early (sometime before Aug. 7) via a virtual roll call.
Biden has given no sign that he is interested in stepping down.
After he left the debate stage, he told supporters, “Let’s keep going.” He allegedly agreed to a second debate. Jill’s post-debate video was optimistic. None of this points to him leaving.
You don’t have to talk about, acknowledge, or promote every new “based” attention seeking female influencer who goes viral over something dumb
You can just block them and spend your time doing just about anything else and be better off for it
Waffle House Wendy, the trailer park trad wife who turned out to have an OnlyFans and multiple abortions…might be worth rethinking glorifying every woman who goes viral over something seemingly “based”
The same applies to guys who guy viral too. Oliver Anthony wrote a decent song but he wasn’t a conservative icon, nor did he want to be. But we all know that it is a different and more powerful drive that propels seemingly based women to viral heights.