How Much Can a Fashion Earloop Mask Protect You? (The Upgrade Edition) (Trifolds Only)
Let’s talk about masks that anyone might want to wear, no matter what they believe in, just because some of them actually look cute.
***Warning: This one’s super experimental, but there’s some hopefully useful default fit info for you here, too!
I tested a bunch of popular trifold KN95s and KF94s to see how well they fit my face. I then made some mods to them and tested every step of the way.
Overall, these respirators/masks usually have really good filtration and SOMETIMES fit surprisingly well... But you basically have to fit test every single batch or even piece, especially if you’re buying obscure-looking stuff of eBay or Amazon.
I hope I included your favourites. If not, I’m accepting requests for the next one! 🧵
I used my oldie PortaCount 8020A to fit test the masks (which I then tried to convert into respirators 😉).
A typical Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) fit testing protocol includes eight exercises: Normal breathing, Deep breathing, Head side to side, Head up and down, Speaking out loud, Bending, and back to Normal breathing. Each exercise is one minute long, adding up to eight minutes total.
The scores included are means across one or more exercises. I would always start with normal breathing. Whenever I got a higher-than-expected score on that, I would keep moving through next steps of the protocol to get a better picture. I usually stopped at the first four exercises max once I could see a pattern in the scores. And there were times I ended up doing the whole OSHA protocol.
So some of the scores are single exercise scores. Others are composites of no more than four exercises.
For the mods, I used stuff I had lying around from used respirators.
Fresh mask:
46 [97.83% protection] – okay this is actually good without mods? I thought my PortaCount broke for a sec there
Mask + Laianzhi KN100 respirator nose wire:
52 [98.08% protection] – nice!
Above + KN100 nose foam & leather strap ear saver*:
83 [98.80% protection] – wowza!
Note: the ear saver I used is from Etsy and no longer available, but here’s a similar one: etsy.com/ca/listing/797…
I also tried replacing its earloops with the KN100 headstraps, but they did not improve the score. This is the very first mask I tested for this experiment. I messed up something the first time around when I did record the headstraps result. I did not use the scores from the very first time at all. For the second time, I did not record my added headstraps score, but it definitely did not make a difference.
For all other specimens I tested, I did include the headstraps data.
I was so impressed with its performance, I did a full OSHA test. Here are the results. (% filtration = % protection here)
Caveats: It’s a very soft mask, which makes it less sturdy than N95s. I wore it with all successful mods (foam + wire + ear saver) after this experiment for ~10 hours. Its fit factor fell to 25 across a full OSHA test. If you’d like the full scores for that, please let me know! (Too much data, too little time)
Looks like this one hit a ceiling at around 25 fit factor (96% protection). The fit felt very snug, so the actual filter might cap out at that filtration %. I find it pretty cool how my (used) PortaCount can also give you a clue about filtration performance without buying the super expensive filtration efficiency machine!
Isn’t it neat how a few mods suddenly changed it into a really decent mask, with its good filtration but what was absolutely awful fit?
Overall, you can see I was able to get decent protection out of even a completely random KF94 off eBay. Any genuinely Korean KF94 or even ones made in China (the Lytecordz ones) are likely to have a good filter.
I bought another batch of the LyteCordz KF94, this time the camo variety pack. All four colour varieties fit my face differently. I had to staple one at the chin to make it pass a seal check, which I did not need to do with the paint splatter batch. And the fit testing results for those were not as great as the first batch, more like the worse ones I’ve tested here (but still not terrible).
Takeaway: If you’re gonna wear an earloop KN95/KF94, make sure to at least qualitatively fit test it!
Here’s a basic DIY, at-home qualitative fit testing setup example: x.com/JenniferKShea/…
Even if you taste Bitrex during testing, which you probably will for anything with a fit factor less than 100, the relative degree to which you taste it will tell you which earloop fits you better.
A stylish earloop might be the only thing you can handle wearing at a social event. But getting sick at that Taylor Swift concert ain’t worth avoiding a proper fit test. Trust me.
Bifolds coming up next (depending on your interest of course) 🙂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I noticed how quickly they failed when I used one on myself. Then, the same thing happened with a friend. I could not believe it, because they fit so many people SO well and are often their best respirator when I fit test them.
There is at least one other person in our fit testing community who tested it and found how quickly it breaks down compared to a 3M Aura:
I decided to formally test this myself with two “specimens” of this respirator in size small. I always wrote down each exact time I put them on and took them off as soon as possible.
Mostly, I wore them for running errands, fit testing other people, cooking, and cleaning. I don’t usually wear regular N95s at my physically intensive job. I did manage to wear the first one for a few hours there, though.
I installed a SIP valve in both of them before my first use. The valves, installed carefully, do not affect fit based on my previous tests.
I did my best to fit test the respirator every few hours using my PortaCount 8020A. I plugged the fit testing port in the respirator to be able to use it in-between testings.
What I thought would be a quick experiment ended up going from Aug. 16 until Sept. 9.
I took a full, long shower in an earloop Zimi ZM9541F after 10 hours of prior wear with a SIP valve installed. I then fit tested the totally soaked thing with my PortaCount 8020A (always in N99 mode).
The scores dropped, but it still gave really good protection.
I did not collect proper controls for this one (prior to wear and SIP valve installation), unfortunately.
My fit factor for a fresh filter without a SIP valve on OSHA protocol was 55 with the grimace exercise, which is usually not counted, and 57 without. So 98.1% protection.
Post-shower, this is what its performance was like across OSHA exercises:
Normal breathing: 54
Deep breathing: 41
Head side to side: 76
Head up and down: 54
Speaking: 63
Grimace: 10
Reaching: 19
Normal breath: 65
Best Quality Earloops: Rapid Fire OSHA testing edition.
Can an earloop mask be protective?
(Disclaimer: These results are for my face only. I also have a Roman nose, which can make nose leaks more likely).
Scores are harmonized mean fit factors (HMFF), grimace exercise score taken out.
Worst to best:
*Wellbefore 3D Pro Black KN95 - 11.68 HMFF (8.6% leak, 91.4% effectiveness)
*Breatheteq medium black KN95 - 12.91 HMFF (8.3% leak, 91.7% effectiveness)
*Canadamasq CA-N95F medium - 19.93 HMFF (5.26% leak, 94.74% effectiveness)
*ZiMi ZM9541F black, mod tension 450mm each loop - 11.69 HMFF (1.75% leak, 98.25% effectiveness).
You can see it's possible to get over 100 fit factor here and there on an earloop, but not consistently enough to be considered a respirator suited for hazardous settings per OSHA. Some people might even pass an OSHA fit test in an earloop, but it is still a less reliable fit.
I would argue that the ZiMi earloop is a half-respirator due to its well-sealing elasto-like body. Definitely the only earloop I would ever wear to a hair salon!
It’s pool and beach season! Will a respirator work for swimming and water parks (or shower sans hair washing)?
Using my PortaCount 8020A, I tested the most accessible & affordable water-resistant respirator, 3M Aura 1870+, after 6 and 8 hours of wear at the pool (1.5hrs total of swimming) across a month. I did install a SIP valve in it – you get thirsty!
To see if you really need a water-resistant version, I then tested the 1870+ against a non-water resistant 3M Aura respirator with similar rubbery straps, the 9205+.
The results were surprisingly good all around.
(photo is a fresh and used 1870+ side by side)
Here are my 1870+ scores for swimming. Thank you @fittesttheplanet for the little probe plug that made re-testing a probed one possible!
I also wore swim goggles during all “soaks”.
Baseline - Fresh 3M 1870+, no SIP valve, OSHA protocol
Normal breath: 144
Deep breath: 103
Head side to side: 167
Head up and down: 120
Speaking: 49
Grimace: 179
Reaching: 88
Normal breath: 145
Score w/ grimace: 106.34 (99.06% of air filtered)
Score w/o grimace: 100.51 (99.01% filtered)
Note: I have tested the SIP valve in the past and it did not have any impact on fit testing scores. The focus here is on trends across time. It is possible that I installed it differently this time, but I don’t think this is likely with the follow-up scores. I did not have a way to seal the probe when I started using the respirator.
Time 1 – 3M 1870+ After 6 hours (1hr swim, always head above water, no extra splashing), with SIP valve installed. Respirator was almost dry when tested.
Normal breath: 157
Deep breath: 83
Head side to side: 145
Head up and down: 108
Speaking: 58
Grimace: 87
Reaching: 80
Normal breath: 129