🧵1/3 #middleclass #workingclass #race #gender #class #chrismurphy #davidsirota #berniesanders #Democrats #Republicans
After every election cycle ending with major Dem losses, progressive white men (and Jill Stein) emerge from the shadows to blame the Dem party for not working to attract "the" working class or middle class (they seem to use the terms interchangeably). They are so blind to implicit racism and sexism that they cannot even understand how insulting their comments are.
Although I would love to see the Dems embrace economic justice openly and explicitly, these comments reflect bigotry because every POC demographic prefers Dem candidates, even though whites do not. Among these groups are many of the poorest segments in the US. Latina and Black-women headed households are THE poorest in the country. And anyone who wants to discuss the "working class," should at least know that Black workers have the highest rate of participation in labor unions. Yet, they are totally ignored when the pseudo-Marxist white men urge Dems to focus on the working class.
Generally, POC have been critical and reliable demographics for Dems. And despite all of the chatter about Trump's performance with Blacks and Latinos, he overwhelming lost Blacks and Latinas. After the Census update and the most accurate data on voting behavior are released next year, I would not be surprised if some of these categories, including Latino men, were adjusted upwardly to reflect greater support for Harris.
2/3 Why do some of the most vulnerable populations in the US -- including those that are disproportionately working-class, middle-class, and poor -- back Dems, but whites do not? Even if you don't or cannot answer this question, you still must admit that only "certain" middle/working class voters back Republicans. These people are overwhelmingly White. That's what makes these pseudo-Marxist arguments so insulting. The "what about the working-class" refrain relies on making racial minorities--especially women in these groups--INVISIBLE. This is NOT progressive. It's racist. Progressive racism -- and sexism.
I am also turned off by these arguments because the proponents seem like they have NEVER heard of intersectionality. For people of color, race, class, and gender have always been aspects of their experiences with subordination Accordingly, they cannot divorce their economic condition from race or gender. Their lived experience AND sociological data validate their multidimensional understanding of inequality. If we really want equal justice, we need more than tossing trite phrases like neoliberalism and working class into debates. Yes, these things are important, but they don't come close to explaining oppression in the US (not even for white poor people -- who have intersectional experiences too).
This rhetoric also bothers because I believe the pseudo Marxist are trying, unsuccessfully, to mask their true goal: to eliminate race, gender, LGBTQ, disability, and other concerns from the realm of Dem politics. It's no coincidence that these issues don't touch them personally in a negative way.
3/3 Ironically, they commonly believe that "identity politics" is a losing strategy. WHAT THE HELL? The Republicans run on identity politics every single time. And they often win BECAUSE of (not in spite of) identity politics. Republicans run on the politics of white identity (think: lying about and banning Critical Race Theory -- research conducted largely by POC, reflecting the viewpoints of most POC, and challenging Republican rugged individualism mythology), Christian nationalism, heterosexism, transphobia, ableism, class warfare (poor people are lazy), racist/xenophobia (they don't hate all migrants or even undocumented migrants--just brown and black migrants).
So to @ChrisMurphyCT @BernieSanders @davidsirota and many others, do the introspection necessary to have a credible voice in this conversation. Those of us who are POC, LGBTQ, women, disabled, and all of the various intersections have been forced to validate our existence since childhood. It's absolutely maddening when so-called allies attempt to write us out of existence yet again. Wake up.
Please do not respond with "I'm a POC, and I believe" (your anecdote does not defeat data); I am gay/a woman/a migrant, so I can't be raci----(stop midsentence: you can be); you folks always focus on race (race has been a problem in the US from the very inception, and it remains one today - see the data I discuss). I will block. I don't tolerate gaslighting. Find someone who does.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Department of Education: Trump Lies, Hidden Dangers 1/3
So Donald Trump is already exposing his own lies, and MAGAs, like little lambs following a wolf, are ready to defend him. 1. Trump said that he has nothing to do with Project 2025, but dismantling DOE is a huge part of it. He now promises to shut down DOE. This wasn't a substantial part of his 2016 campaign, but Republicans have always hated it. DOE enforces federal statutory civil rights and constitutional law. It also administers money to reduce inequities caused by property-tax-funded education policies. Opponents are natural foes of these things that help create equal opportunity.
2. Trump says he wants to send the money used by DOE "back" to the states, and like slugs for salt, MAGAs are clinging to his words. BUT, DOE didn't take ANY money from the states. States have their own systems for financing education at the state and county level. Congress created DOE for several purposes, including enforcement of civil rights and constitutional law AND providing money for "poverty schools" so that poor kids can get a better education. Congress allocates money for this program (Title II) and DOE makes sure that states don't violate the law by allocating it improperly.
2/3
3. Trump is arguing "states rights." In US history, this rallying cry has usually meant something horrific for marginalized groups. It defended slavery, Jim Crow, and laws making it impossible for POC to vote. It also justified Republican opposition to things they claim to cherish today -- like Social Security and unemployment insurance. Most recently, conservatives have invoked states rights to justify overturning Roe v. Wade.
Nothing in the Constitution, however, prohibits Congress from spending on education and enforcing the federal law regarding education. In fact, the Constitution directly authorizes Congress to spend in the general welfare of the nation (a functioning educational systems fits this provision) and to enforce civil rights contained in numerous amendments - especially the Fourteenth Amendment. Republicans prevailed in their challenge to Colorado's decision to remove Trump from the ballot because SCOTUS held that Congress needed to enforce the provision (because the Constitution authorizes Congress to enforcement Fourteenth Amendment). Now, they want Congress out of the business of civil rights enforcement in education. Ha! Hypocrisy is still their MO.
3/3
4. Trump, the Republicans, and Project 2025 advocate for a system of benefits that operated during Jim Crow. Congress would give (not return) money to states for important initiatives, BUT states could administer the programs with little intervention from the federal government. FDR made deals like this to pass many of his economic programs--leading to many POC being shut out of wealth formation of the Boomer generation. Today, the Republicans are trying to do the same. They hate education because they have a difficult time winning educated white voters. And naturally, they want to keep the poor trapped in poverty--while calling them lazy. Shame.
5. The president cannot "shut down" DOE or even alter its power structure. Only Congress can do this. The president cannot give/return money to the states that Congress has required DOE to administer directly.
Burning question: Will moderate Republicans show some decency and stop this mad crusade, or does this election prove there's none left?
The information @elonmusk cites is FALSE.
First, The FBI crime reporting systems has always been voluntary. Here's a link to a 2018 FBI description of the reporting system, describing it as VOLUNTARY. For those who don't remember, Trump was president. le.fbi.gov/file-repositor…
Also, while some jurisdictions do not submit information, criminologists review local/state crime data and find that they coincide with trends from reporting jurisdictions. factcheck.org/2024/05/trumps…
The post Musk retweeted also claims that "Soros prosecutors" have decriminalized acts of violence. This is nutty. The crime data lists incidents of REPORTED crimes and ARRESTS. It doesn't include prosecution for many reasons (much higher standard of proof).
Just like everyone else, Black men want to thrive and have hope for their futures. One wonders if the powers that be have conducted polling on this issue.
The obvious things are: 1. Jobs - not just saying Black unemployment is the lowest it has been in [fill in the blank] years. It has always been much lower than the unemployment rate for Whites. So getting it to the lowest level doesn't paint a complete picture. The best things for job growth is government and private sector spending. Honestly, government spending fuels private spending too. Tons of companies are benefitting from the infrastructure investments. This money needs to be channeled into poverty neighborhoods (as distinct from poor people).
2. Black men also receive lower incomes when hired when compared to white men. So jobs with good wages (some that might require technical training -- not 4-year Ivy colleges with a lot of debt to relieve) are essential. Supporting these types of educational opportunities are vital. Obviously, vigorous civil rights enforcement is required--so are liberal judges. There's a lot more than we can do with messaging on judges -- protect the rights of poor people, protect people from wage and employment discrimination, etc. Instead, it's Roe and presidential immunity. Again -- these things are very important, but they have limited force.
3. Black men, due to poverty and racism, are also the most vulnerable to arrest and incarceration. Criminal "justice" reform is absolutely important. I noticed recently that Biden pulled together an executive order on this, but it seems a bit late. Also, reform cannot focus on nicer policing. There are fundamental problems in our criminal justice system -- that begin with unequal education and housing segregation. By the time cops are involved, the pattern is almost set. So just as we celebrate infrastructure investments, lets invest much more in our nation's "poverty" schools, which are predominately Black and Latino. Investing in HBCUs is important, but if kids don't get a pre-k--12 education, this will not help them. It's a more of a middle class policy.
About these polls showing other folks doing better: Remember, this kind of polling was irrelevant when they showed Bernie doing better than Hillary. I was one of the strongest Clinton supporters -- but I am also honest. They are responding differently than in 2016.