Let’s talk about Oregon: a good model to follow according to Leadbeater assisted suicide bill supporters.
After legalisation, the numbers of assisted suicides skyrocketed from 16 in 1998 to 367 in 2023.
If Eng & Wales end up at same rate that's over 5,000 people each year.
...
…
The huge increase in assisted suicides has not led to a reduction in other suicides (this is one of the issues @kimleadbeater claims her Bill will address):
the rate of unassisted suicide in Oregon has increased by more than 20% since 1998.
…
…
43% of those who are helped to commit suicide in Oregon, say they were concerned about being a burden on friends, family or carers.
The percentage worried about being a burden has increased significantly over time – it was just 13% in 1998.
…
…
Women are relatively more affected. Women make up just over 20% of unassisted suicides in Oregon but over 40% of assisted suicides.
…
…
Between 2021-2023, 103 assisted suicide patients (7%) took > 6 hours to die.
The longest time to death was 137 hours (5.7 days).
9 patients regained consciousness after taking the drugs.
…
…
Is Oregon really such a good model for vulnerable people in England?
Rather than allowing doctors to help patients commit suicide, perhaps we should focus on improving palliative care, i.e. helping people in the natural process of death.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @Channel4 @reformparty_uk racism row is developing into an astonishing story. Whether or not Ch 4 paid Andrew Parker, hard to see how they can come out unscathed.
As I see it, there are 4 possibilities:
1. @Channel4 set up & paid Parker. They are explicit they did not.
...
... 2. Someone else (production company or a 3rd party) paid Parker.
If @Channel4 knew, this is as bad as Option 1.
If Ch 4 didn't know, it means they did no due diligence.
For such a consequential story, that would be grossly irresponsible & must lead to consequences.
...
... 3. Parker was acting unpaid deliberately to smear @reformparty_uk .
Again, either @Channel4 knew, in which case their piece was deliberately deceptive, or they did not, which would again mean no due diligence & grossly irresponsible journalism.
...
An objective examination of the data and evidence suggests that delaying the March 25 lockdown decision by a week or so would have saved lives.
Here’s why …
…
We know from deaths data, NHS Triage and React that infections were almost certainly decreasing well before 25 March (and the rise in infections was levelling off even earlier). But those data were not available by the 25th.
...
...
It remains possible lockdown caused an even faster reduction in infections, preventing some Covid-related deaths in the short run but …
The Scottish Covid Inquiry commissioned an independent expert (Dr Ashley Croft) to report on “the accepted scientific & medical understanding” of Covid-19.
This is his conclusion on the evidence of interventions aimed at limiting spread:
…
…
For face mask mandates outside of healthcare settings, lockdowns, social distancing, test, trace and isolate measures:
"there was either insufficient evidence in 2020 to support their use – or alternatively, no evidence”
...
And:
“the evidence base has not changed materially in the intervening three years.”
Dr Croft on the evidence for vaccines having saved lives:
"It remains unclear as to whether or not COVID-19 vaccination has resulted in fewer deaths from COVID-19."
…
@BPAS1968 & pro-abortion MPs campaigned successfully to be able to to send out abortion pills without any in-person consultation.
@BPAS1968 then sent out pills w/o doing any checks to ensure the mother was within the 10-week limit.
…
…
Carla Foster took the pills & Lily (nearly 8 months after conception) died.
The mother was distraught, deeply regretting the death of her baby & has been imprisoned.
i.e. @BPAS1968 actions led to the death of an innocent baby girl & the devastation of a woman’s life.
…
…
Instead of apologising for their disastrous negligence & promising to change, @BPAS1968 are now campaigning to extend the law so it would be legal for them to kill babies right up to the moment of birth for any reason.
This organisation is not only shameful but shameless.
…