Robert W Malone, MD Profile picture
Nov 13, 2024 1 tweets 3 min read Read on X
roh roh.
Remind me again why we should have long-term safety data before globally deploying a novel vax?

Government Report Admits AIDS Is Surging Among Covid-Vaccinated
Hunter Fielding

October 21, 2024, Monday

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is surging among people who received Covid mRNA vaccines, a shocking official government report has admitted.

The U.K. government’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report reveals that doubly vaccinated 40-70-year-olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people.

Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%).

If this continues then 30-50-year-olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.

The 5 PHE tables below [embedded in on-line original] from their excellent Vaccine Surveillance Report, separated by 4 weeks, clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune system’s response.

People aged 40-69 have already lost 40% of their immune system capability and are losing it progressively at 3.3% to 6.4% per week.

Weekly Decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaccinated people [see chart embedded in on-line original]

Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months. 30-50- year-olds will have lost it by Christmas.

These people will then effectively have full-blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS.

The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves because it takes forever [minimum 15 years, if it the trial is properly conducted; 20 for the product to be proven safe for pregnant women] to do clinical trials and get approval for something different.

So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (after a couple of months of effectiveness).

Table 2. COVID-19 cases by vaccination status… Cases reported by specimen date between week 32 and week 35 2021 – assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

Cases reported by specimen date between week 33 and week 36 2021 – assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

Cases reported by specimen date between week 34 and week 37 2021 – assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

Cases reported by specimen date between week 35 and week 38 2021 – assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

Cases reported by specimen date between week 36 and week 39 2021 – assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the last column above).

The figures above indicate that their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time).

But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realized.

They presently leave those over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert W Malone, MD

Robert W Malone, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RWMaloneMD

Jul 15
🚨 BREAKING: The U.S. is issuing $81 BILLION in tariff refunds after the Supreme Court ruled President Trump's tariffs were imposed under the wrong legal authority.
But there is much more to this story, than mainstream media is willing to tell you.
The Supreme Court did NOT rule that tariffs are unconstitutional.
It ruled that the President could not use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs this broadly.
That's a ruling about authority, not tariffs themselves.
Here's the obvious question.
If these tariffs were so important...
Why didn't Congress simply pass a law authorizing them?
Congress has the constitutional power to regulate foreign commerce.
The Republican Congress could have supported the President, it chose not to.
Read 10 tweets
Jul 9
"Processed meat causes cancer."
You've heard it a hundred times. But almost nobody stops to ask what "processed meat" actually means.
The answer is far more complicated, and far more interesting, than the headlines suggest. 🧵
For thousands of years, nearly every culture on Earth processed meat.
Salting. Smoking. Drying. Fermenting. Aging.
Without these methods, families couldn't survive winters, armies couldn't march, and civilization itself would have looked very different.
Processing meat is one of humanity's oldest survival skills.
Strictly speaking, all of these are "processed meat":

Prosciutto di Parma
Jamón Ibérico
Traditional salami
Virginia country ham aged 18 months
A supermarket deli ham injected with curing solution
A hot dog
A can of Spam

Same category. Wildly different foods.
Read 15 tweets
Jul 8
For months I have heard senior appointees across this administration describe their work with one crude phrase. They say they have been "cock blocked." Serious people, real titles, real mandates. The term is worth taking seriously, because it reveals more than they intend. 🧵
The term is old. A linguist named Edith Folb recorded it in 1972 among Black teenagers in Los Angeles. It meant interfering with a man's pursuit of a woman, even by someone with no interest in her himself. Spite, not stake. Hold onto that. It matters later.
Over the past fifty years, the phrase has gone tame. The sexual meaning drained out. By the 2010s, it just meant being pettily obstructed by someone with no business getting involved. A dead metaphor, like "screwed" or "sucks." Technically vulgar. In practice, furniture.
Read 17 tweets
Jul 4
You belong to yourself. Your body, your mind, and the code inside your cells are yours. For all of history that was safe, because no one could reach them. That is no longer true. So we wrote down the line. And today we open it for you to sign. Image
We now have machines that read and change the brain, edit the genes you pass to your kids, patent what is found in a drop of your blood, and tie your whole life to a digital ID someone else can switch off. Not science fiction. It exists now.
Used with your permission, these tools can heal. A person who cannot walk might walk again. We are for that. The danger is one word: forced. The day someone decides what is done to your body or mind, and does it whether you agree or not. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jul 2
🧵 America turns 250 this Saturday. The government Americans live under today is not the one the founders built. Somewhere between the Declaration and this anniversary, the leash was cut. Here is how it happened, and what it would take to undo it.
The founders did not trust parchment to limit power. They trusted structure: rival sovereign states, each able to check the center. Madison, Federalist 51: ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The states were the Constitution's immune system.
The Austrian economists explain why this mattered. Government is a monopoly on force, and like every monopoly, it expands unless competition constrains it. Federalism supplied that competition. States competed for citizens and capital. Overtax them, and they leave.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 27
Everyone is reading the Supreme Court's Roundup decision as a fight about glyphosate. Much of MAHA called it a betrayal.
The more I studied the opinion, the more I concluded it is not really about glyphosate at all. 🧵
The justices did not weigh epidemiology. They did not rule on whether glyphosate causes cancer. They did not pick IARC or EPA as the better science.
They answered a narrow legal question with enormous consequences.
The question: when EPA approves a pesticide label under FIFRA, can a state jury later decide the manufacturer should have warned more strongly?
The Court's answer was largely no. EPA-approved labels now preempt most state failure-to-warn claims.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(