Post

More from @qaggnews

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

@qaggnews

Jul 20

‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
Three Alabama men face horrific accusations of raping, sodomizing and trafficking six young children, including one as young as 3, in an underground Bibb County bunker for more than a year, according to court records.

William Chase McElroy, 21, Dalton Terrell, 21, and Andres Velazquez-Trejo, 29, were indicted last week by a Bibb County grand jury.

The alleged incidents happened for more than a year, beginning sometime around New Year’s Day 2024 and continued through April 29, 2025, records state.

Bibb County Sheriff Jody Wade said in a press release issued Saturday night that the investigation began Feb. 4 of this year “following concerns regarding the sexual abuse of children in an underground bunker located in Brent.”

The sheriff nor court records provide any additional information into where the bunker was located.

“Such abhorrent behavior will not be tolerated in Bibb County and .. offenders will face prosecution to the fullest extent of the law,” Wade said in the press release.

Charging documents show the victims were between the ages of 3 and 10. One of the victims was a 6-year-old boy and another was a 3-year-old girl.

The accusations alleged the children endured vaginal intercourse, anal intercourse, and oral sex. Records state one of the suspects “sold” children “to various clientele for sexual pleasure.”

The grand jury on July 11 indicted McElroy on four counts of first-degree rape, six counts of first-degree human trafficking, six counts of first-degree sodomy and four counts of first-degree kidnapping.

al.com/crime/2025/07/…

He was initially arrested Feb. 11 on multiple counts of child sex abuse.

Charging documents from his initial arrest state he admitted to fondling the male victim and raping at least one of the young girls.

On April 25, Wade said, investigators identified Terrell as another suspect and he, too, admitted to sexual intercourse with a minor, according to court records.

The grand jury indicted Terrell with six counts of first-degree rape, 12 counts of first-degree sodomy and five counts of human trafficking.

Terrell, records state, paid at least two adults to use the children – who are now ages 8,6, 10 and 3 – for sexual purposes, including rape and sodomy.

After more investigation, Velazquez-Trejo was arrested on April 29. He is charged with six counts of human trafficking.

The criminal complaint states he sold nude images of the victims to multiple people and sold the children themselves.

The suspects, all from Brent, will be arraigned on the indictments in August.

Court records do not state how the three men may know each other but indicate they all lived in mobile homes approximately a mile from each other at the time of their arrests.

Read 26 tweets

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

@qaggnews

Jul 5

Federal authorities are asking for your help as they continue to search for five men wanted in connection with alleged crimes against children.

All five listed below have ties to New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and/or New York.

In some cases, their alleged illicit activities happened decades ago.

Read More: Help the FBI Find 5 Child Crime Fugitives in NJ, PA & NY | wpgtalkradio.com/wanted-child-c…

Read 13 tweets

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

@qaggnews

Jun 12

This article looks run of the mill standard nothing out of the ordinary or spectacular about it

BUT upon further review, they left out a small detail that should be considered gravely important:

He is a DOD contractor … 😬

This is why we dig. The news wouldn’t have told you this until they absolutely had to.

Ht @FrikmanG80295

@NativeTexan_17

@Shannonagain2

Read 8 tweets

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

@qaggnews

Jun 12

Update:
In April 2024, social messaging app Kik flagged videos involving child sexual abuse from an account called “joebidennnn69.” Investigators identified at least 10 such videos shared through the account and tracked it to May’s house and mobile device, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Federal investigators seized electronics from the 38-year-old last August. Two months later, a court filing confirmed that they took a Lenovo laptop, an Amazon tablet, four cellphones, four hard drives, four SD cards, two DVD-Rs and 19 thumb drives.

If charged with a felony, May faces suspension from the House pending the case’s outcome. State law requires an officeholder indicted on a felony to be suspended.

May also faces up to 20 years in prison, with a minimum of five years, as well as a fine of up to $250,000 if found guilty.

The Freedom Caucus, which suspended May’s membership last year, called for him to resign his House seat.

May previously served as vice chairman but no longer held a leadership position after the caucus’ officer elections last July. His connections in Congress helped launch the state Freedom Caucus in 2022. He acted as de facto spokesman for the group as it battled with the main Republican Caucus until the federal investigation became public.

“These crimes are heinous and we expect that they will be fully investigated,” the Freedom Caucus statement read.

scdailygazette.com/2025/06/12/sc-…

May has not been involved with Freedom Caucus activities since last August, said Rep. Jordan Pace, R-Goose Creek, the caucus’ current chairman. May attended this year’s session, he stayed quiet, not getting involved in floor debates and continuing to vote alongside the Freedom Caucus.

Originally from Virginia, May is married and has two children. He runs consulting firm Ivory Tusk Consulting.

The last legislator suspended while facing federal charges was Rep. Rick Martin in 2021. The Newberry Republican was charged with giving alcohol to a 15-year-old girl and trying to influence an investigation, which he denied at the time. 👀(strange thing to include but I’ll take it )

Martin lost a bid for reelection the following year, losing the primary election to Freedom Caucus member Rep. Joe White

Read 21 tweets

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

@qaggnews

Apr 13

I’m going to keep posting about this until everyone sees it

Across dozens of U.S. states, parents are losing their children based on drug test results that courts should never have trusted. From Alaska to Georgia, California to Ohio, laboratories have been caught falsifying test results, billing for unnecessary procedures, and engaging in illegal kickback schemes, yet their services are still being used in family courts. These labs, many of which have already faced Department of Justice investigations or civil settlements, continue to supply the very tests that child protective agencies and juvenile courts rely on to justify emergency removals and terminations of parental rights. In states like Indiana and Kentucky, parents have lost custody after being falsely flagged as drug users. In Missouri and Utah, courts have relied on unconfirmed positives to delay or deny reunification. In Ohio, even antacids were misidentified as narcotics.

The legal consequences are staggering. The Fourteenth Amendment protects a parent’s right to the care and custody of their child. Supreme Court precedent in Santosky v. Kramer (1982) and Troxel v. Granville (2000) affirms that parental rights are fundamental and require rigorous due process protections. Yet in case after case, these rights are steamrolled by faulty drug tests rubber-stamped by courts without challenge or oversight. Even more alarming is the constitutional violation under the Fourth Amendment. In Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001), the Supreme Court held that drug testing for law enforcement purposes without informed consent was unconstitutional. In the child welfare arena, the same principles apply, ]yet thousands of parents are being subjected to testing under threat of losing their children, with no safeguards in place.

The legal framework is clear, when state actors violate constitutional rights using flawed evidence, they may be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. But for many parents, the damage is already done. Children are uprooted. Families are fractured. And in too many cases, these removals are permanent. This isn’t just a legal crisis, it’s a human one. Child welfare systems are using unreliable drug testing as a shortcut to remove children rather than a tool to assess actual danger. Until courts demand verified, scientifically sound evidence and allow parents a real chance to defend themselves, the system will remain dangerously broken

Read the full investigation and state-by-state breakdown of lab misconduct:

[)artkitten2.medium.com/fraudulent-lab…

In recent years, drug testing has become a routine procedure in family court and child welfare cases. While the intent is to ensure child safety, the reality is that drug testing can sometimes lead to unwarranted family separations and violations of parental rights. Multiple drug testing laboratories across various states have been implicated in fraudulent activities, including false billing schemes, illegal kickbacks for referrals, and substandard or falsified testing practices. These issues have been documented through Department of Justice press releases, court records, and state investigations. Several of these laboratories provided services in child welfare and family court settings, causing significant concerns about the reliability of test results influencing decisions on parental rights.
Legal authorities and case law affirm that parents possess fundamental rights concerning the custody and care of their children. The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution safeguards these rights, ensuring that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” In cases such as Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), and Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982), the Supreme Court has recognized the fundamental nature of parental rights. Therefore, courts that rely on faulty or unconfirmed drug test results as a basis for removing custody violate due process requirements, particularly when procedural safeguards are insufficient.
Government mandated drug testing engages the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Supreme Court, in Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2001), held that a state hospital’s policy of conducting involuntary drug tests on pregnant women for law enforcement purposes constituted an unreasonable search, thus violating the Fourth Amendment. This highlights the necessity for consent and reasonableness in drug testing practices, especially when such tests can significantly impact individual rights. Parents facing testing requirements should understand these risks before offering samples that could dramatically impact their family’s future. This report identifies laboratories in various states that have been investigated for fraudulent schemes or providing false results in drug testing operations.

Read 17 tweets

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

@qaggnews

Apr 2

For some reason the article keeps mentioning Jeffrey Epstein

Read 5 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @qaggnews

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

Qᴀɢɢ.ɴᴇᴡꜱ

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!