tucker: "the truth is one of the main problems in this country is that everyone is on some kind of drug, or drunk. everyone's on pills. it's crazy. everyone's on SSRIs, or meth they call adderall, benzos, weed. weed makes you passive and stupid. it makes you into a loser.
why don't you just face your life? it's so awesome. it makes you weak. the more you party, the more you run away, the weaker you get.
we should just go full saudi on the drug thing. i mean it. like full saudi. yeah that's harsh. okay. but compared to what? watching people die of fentanyl ODs on the sidewalk? have you been to our cities recently? it's totally cruel and inhumane and beneath us as a nation to allow people to OD on drugs on the sidewalk. there's no kindness in that at all. you hate people if you allow that.
and we're letting the whole country do that. and encouraging them to do drugs. lock them up, man. I hope we get full saudi on those people, including the policymakers who allowed it. they've killed so many people. they deserve to be punished in a very severe way.
bring back the war on drugs but this time we're not joking."
tucker says love and character wins: "you don't have to win every argument. should i just crush them in a debate? i could easily do that. but then i thought, you know, the only way you really change people's minds is just by loving them. show people love and that wins them over in the end.
also being happy. if there are two sides of a debate and one side seems grounded and cheerful and has functional relationships and wives who respect them and kids who love them. and if the other side is living in an apartment screaming at MSNBC maybe they're on the wrong side.
the people with balanced, happy lives are probably on the right path. if your program is so effective, then why are you so miserable? and why do your kids have weird piercings and clearly hate you? and your wife obviously has no respect for you at all?
i'm not going to vote for the party of unhappy people. if i want to change people's minds, then i want to model success. which is calm cheerfulness, peace, connection between people, stable, enduring relationships. and by living that openly you change way more minds than by any argument you can muster."
"if you want to restore honesty to government, there's a very simple way to do that, and it's with transparency. why is it that 62 years later after the president of the united states was murdered we can't see the documents on that? why is it that 23 years after 9/11 files are still classified?
it's our government. no federal bureaucrat has the right to tell you that you can't know what your government is doing. who owns this government? the federal bureaucrat who can't be fired? no i don't think so. we do.
if you wind up in a country with over a billion classified federal documents, you are living in an extremely corrupt country. we don't think we live in a corrupt country. we do. every 9/11 document should be declassified. if you want to create conspiracy theories, pull down a curtain of secret over what actually happened. why are you afraid to tell me the truth? i have a moral right to it."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
CS lewis predicted the dangers of mass democracy in his “screwtape proposes a toast” letter portraying a demon influencing human governments and the problem with forced communist egalitarianism
1/ on conformity and NPC culture
“cut them all down to a level. all slaves, all ciphers, all nobodies. all equals. thus tyrants could practice ‘democracy.’ but now ‘democracy’ can do the same work without any other tyranny than her own.”
2/ on corrupting language
“democracy is the word with which you must lead them by the nose. the good work which our experts have already done in the corruption of human language makes it unnecessary to warn you that they should never be allowed to give this word a clear and definable meaning. they won’t. you are to use the word purely as an incantation. you then make a stealthy transition in their minds from this political ideal to a factual belief that all men *are* equal. as a result, you can use the word ‘democracy’ to sanction in his thought the most degrading of all human feelings.”
conservatism has long had too many gatekeepers and not enough gates.
thread 🧵
1/
there’s nothing the left will selectively self-cancel themselves for. no position is too extreme to draw repudiation from fellow liberals and leftists. on the contrary, the left doesn’t just quietly silence the extreme and move on. they elevate and mainstream them.
2/
defund the police? the left rewards you. child mutilation as national policy? the left rewards you. burn down cities? the left rewards you. push genocidal race rhetoric? the left rewards you.
meanwhile, the system persecutes his supporters and tries to arrest him to prevent a 2024 run. if the regime won’t move on, why should republican voters?
what conservatives are ignoring, given our bleak electoral landscape (mass mail-in voting, millions of illegals replacing americans, a federal bureaucracy and media colluding against us) is that trump’s era was the last time flyover country will ever get representation in DC.
have voter attitudes changed? diehard support for the former president, in many cases, is symbolic. it’s an act of defiance. it’s the biggest middle finger forgotten americans can give to a system they believe has failed them. and maybe that symbolism is all they have left.
the “culture war” is obviously worth fighting, but conservatives have long been outgunned and outmanned in the battle. simply reacting to the left’s latest insanity is not enough. we need to be creating culture of our own and presenting a better forward-thinking way of life.
the issue here is conservatives are notoriously awful at culture. most of them are nerds and dorks grifting off-shoot products for other nerds and dorks or holding lame philosophical debates. aesthetics matter. we have to be cooler and more appealing than the left.
a lot of this comes down to incentives too. republicans think donating to the GOP and winning an election will solve the problem while democrats devote themselves to causes that conquer territory and change the culture. again, only one side is really trying to win.
trump achieved the impossible in 2016. DC felt threatened. they immediately spread a hoax through the FBI/DNC to hamper trump’s whole presidency and have targeted him relentlessly since. coincidentally, our elections changed after 2016. why is that?
this argument from the right reveals weakness, blindness, and deception. who decides who wins? is it “the people” as we’re meant to believe or an elite “shadow campaign” across every sector (including the government) conspiring against the president?
3/
during trump’s term they ran new psyops weekly. “the walls are finally closing in!”
they put J6 protesters in solitary confinement. they even banned him from speaking! if you won an election fair and square you wouldn’t need to go to such lengths. but that’s the tell.
tucker in iowa talking about aesthetics and architecture: "i don't think i've ever heard a politician mention beauty. noble ideologies produce beautiful results. poisonous ideologies produce ugliness."
tucker: "the republican party has somehow found itself in this position where they feel like they have to defend the aesthetics and the economics of the dollar store. that's free enterprise? no it's not. it's an atrocity that diminishes people. that destroys god's creation."
tucker: "what is america? well, america is a physical place. no, it's not an idea. anyone who says america is an idea? please. it's not an idea. it's a place. i live there. i don't live in an idea. i don't live theoretically."