Basics of Logistics Support – What keeps your unit working?
Despite sounding incredibly dull, logistics is the reason why warfighters are able to keep fighting whether they be infantry, special forces, or guerillas. General John Pershing during the first World War said, “Infantry wins battles, logistics wins wars.” Logistics ensure that units have water to drink, food to eat, medical supplies to consume, and keep the flow of bullets into magazines. Without reliable logistics, a unit deteriorates very fast. Without bullets, no shooting happens. Without food, the morale suffers. Without medicine, men die. Without water, everyone dies. Any army that hopes to win in any conflict needs to establish a logistics department of some form lest they risk imminent defeat. The question then to ask is, “how are these set up?”
This article is written from the perspective of having to create a logistics team from the ground up as a prepared citizen or group of citizens during a major event such as cataclysms, conventional war, or unconventional warfare where citizens may need to act as guerillas. THIS IS NOT ADVICE TO GO DO ANYTHING ILLEGAL. DO NOT BREAK THE LAW. DO NOT CONSIDER BREAKING THE LAW. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS OR MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY INSURRECTIONIST MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT ADVOCATE FOR ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS, MOVEMENTS, OR IDEAOLOGIES. PLEASE DON’T DRONE STRIKE ME.
Supply Prioritization.
First and foremost, before delivering the supplies, the supplies that are needed need to be determined. Beginning with ammunition, then water, and finally food. Logistics teams need to evaluate the size of the unit they are supporting and what their needs actually are.
For example, let’s take a small 10-man squad composed of 1 medic, 1 support weapons operator, 1 squad lead, 2 team leads, and the remaining 5 men being riflemen. Let’s look at what equipment they are likely to go through quickly and need the most urgently:
Riflemen – ammunition, basic medkits, and water
Medic – More advanced medical supplies, IV fluids, extra water
Support weapons operator – specialized ammunition for their platform, tools and weapon’s lube for maintenance
Leadership – ammunition, maps, batteries, communication devices.
Quantities needed are generally formulated from greater statistically analysis than I can provide. In lieu of that, the team can also analyze the duration of the team’s mission and intensity to deliver approximate amounts of logistical supplies. If a team is planned to go out and perform a quick ambush against a small group and then return home, the logistics team should focus on providing enough equipment to support the team for an appropriately short mission. While it sounds obvious to state this, misallocation of supplies is commonplace and can cause a lot of unnecessary complications in the field.
Organization of Supplies.
In order to actually deliver the supplies, the team needs to know where the supplies are at. Ideally supplies should be centralized, at least the most essential ones. A primary stockpile that is in a safe location and is accessible to all team members. In the case of a guerilla warfare type scenario, stockpiles can be dispersed but their contents should be known.
When it comes to storing items in a stockpile, safety and appropriate volumetric sizes need to be considered. Firstly with safety, things such as ammunition should be stored away from other supplies to prevent cookoffs (fires that spread to ammunition and lead to a series of explosions) from damaging other goods. Ammunition should also be separated by caliber rather than being one big dump. This is partially to preserve the other calibers in case of cookoff but also to ensure that is easily locatable.
Storage of food and water on the other hand requires more of a vaguely mathematical approach. Teams need to make use of their space allotted to them to hold as much material as possible. Water and food needs to be placed in easily stacked containers such as boxes or drums.
Allocation of Supplies.
As mentioned earlier, certain teams only need certain amounts of goods. Supplies should be distributed by logistics teams according to their individual needs. Individual logistics teams distributing equipment on the other hand need to be careful with how much they are carrying. A frontline logistics team would do well to carry minimal essentials required when making deliveries to prevent massive losses should the team be destroyed. More rearward support units on the other hand can have an excess on hand to easily distribute if frontline units require more or are annihilated by battlespace actors.
Another option to touch on is the setup of field caches for extended ops, clandestine teams, or for guerillas. A series of small, hidden supply caches along an established route can make short work for teams operating in the field to stop at for resupply or for a logistics team to gather needed supplies.
Delivery and Resupply Strategies.
If an army fights on it’s stomach, the supply route is the esophagus. Supply routes need to be established early and constantly reevaluated for safety and efficiency. These routes need to be as short as possible and as safe as possible to ensure speedy delivery times and actually ensuring the supplies arrive. They should be sheltered from enemy positions or enemy vectors of attack. Multiple redundant routes should be established in case the primary route is compromised.
Supplies should be delivered at regular intervals and their quantities based on expected usage rates by the team they are supporting. In the case of teams in the field, mobile resupply options such as small backpacks that can be tossed, carried on a tac vest that is dropped, or even delivered via a drone allows teams to work quickly and prevent them from lingering in a dangerous position. A great example of this comes from the GWOT where bandoliers of 5.56 ammo would be prepacked into ammo cans and then dropped via helicopter, allowing teams to resupply rapidly without needing a guy with a truck to swing through and drop off ammunition traditionally.
Teams can also make use of a rotational system where non-essential personnel carry supplies forward and take empty containers or unneeded gear back. This is to prevent the logistics team from having to personally send a man or a team out to the field to get the scraps, excess, or accidentally sent stuff back to the logistics team, giving them more time and manpower to deliver goods.
Emergency Procedures.
Logistics teams should plan for emergency extractions and medical evacuations in the case of a mass casualty event while conducting deliveries in the field. Assignment of specific individuals or roles to manage casualties and to bring them to designated evacuation points is ideal.
In the case of discovery or destruction of a primary supply cache, secondary, redundant, caches should be employed with emergency essentials, enough to keep their assigned duties operating for a few days allows the team a fallback option while the primary supply line is reconfigured.
Conclusion.
Logistics is a tricky business and can be more full of spreadsheets than I am comfortable with being around. Though, at it’s core is only a handful of principles that are followed. They are as discussed, assessing needs based on roles and mission scope of their units of responsibility, organization of supplies, planning and executing of resupply routes, and preparing for emergencies to ensure that everyone else is able to operate smoothly. Obviously this is a super generalized approach and every conflict and situation will have different demands as well as inputs and outputs but the basics laid out here are well enough that they can be generally applied to most situations and adjusted to their needs. Whether you are a prepper, a guerilla, an aid worker in the aftermath of a hurricane, almost any scenario where getting goods from place A to place B to keep everyone functioning, this rough layout can help establish and execute a plan.
Act accordingly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Is your defensive position secure, or will it collapse at first contact? 🧵
Knowing how to build a fighting position properly is a lifesaver. Here's how you do it.
Basic Fighting Positions
For as long as man has found it pertinent to kill one another, there has been a need for field construction to build defensive and offensive structures to gain an advantage over an adversary. From the siege towers of medieval Europe to the hastily built trenches of modern Ukraine, fighters have felled many trees and dug many pits to defend positions, obfuscate their location, and protect them from fire. While every rifleman is not a combat engineer, every rifleman should have a repertoire of the basic fighting positions that they can dig in the field under their belt.
Fighting positions are more than simple holes to hide in during artillery barrages. Fighting positions do provide a lot of protection from enemy fire, shrapnel from explosives, and other forms of indirect fire but they also provide an easy way to organize a team into fields and sectors of fire to overwatch large areas with little overlap. Positions can be built in a manner that allows units to defend a location of any shape or size, offering opportunities for even full 360-degree coverage if the situation demands it.
Position selection.
When selecting a location for a fighting position the acronym of KOCOA is commonly utilized for assessing prime locations for fighting positions. KOCOA is often used for tactical and strategic battlefield analysis. The letters stand for:
K – Key Terrain: Key terrain is terrain features that give a tactical advantage to either side or it may be an objective that must be taken or held. This could be a hill, ridge, gulley, bridge, or a building that oversees an area with a lot of enemy movement. Key terrain should be occupied or at the very least, denied to the enemy.
O – Observation and Fields of Fire: The ability to see your enemy and effectively engage them with direct or indirect fire is a core necessity of a proper fighting position. Fields of fire should be clear. Examples of an ideal field of fire would be down the slope of a hill or across an open field as both provide excellent line of sight for the defender while minimizing their own visual signature (especially for the one looking down a hill, these are some of the best fighting position locations).
C – Cover and Concealment: Cover protects from bullets and shrapnel while concealment hides one from view. Ideally a fighting position should offer both protection and stealth. If a decision must be made for only of those, the selection of which will depend entirely on circumstances unique to the situation such as the enemy, the team and their abilities, the objective, etc.
O – Obstacles: Obstacles will slow or halt enemy movement. Obstacles can be natural such as rives and cliffs or manmade with area denial tools like razor wire and minefields. Positions should be placed behind or beside obstacles in order to funnel enemy movement into the team’s fields of fires.
A - Avenues of Approach: Routes in which the enemy force can use to advance toward the team or their objective are the avenues of approach. These should be covered with fields of fire. Positions should not be on or in these areas unless there are no other options as they place the team in direct confrontation with the opposing force.
While the acronym is clumsy like most military acronyms, KOCOA provides leaders with a simple tool to identify strong areas for positions to be placed to better confront their enemy.
The U.S. military has been warning about this problem for over a decade and Ukraine just proved them right.
Area denial isn’t about winning ground. It’s about making movement impossible. 🧵
Area denial, sometimes referred to as anti-access, is a common military tactic to control the access into and out of an area. Area denial is a particularly useful tool for irregular forces such as smaller special forces teams, guerrillas, and militias. The US military considers the adoption of area denial strategies by adversarial forces as, “[something] that may well be the most difficult operational challenge US forces will face over the coming decades.” While that quote may be from 2012 (JOAC 17 January 2012), it still rings true and can be seen in areas such as Ukraine where FPV drones create zones that units can only enter at their own peril. Area denial is a powerful tool in the strategic toolbox for units to make use of to help slow or fully stop the movement of enemy forces through an area. As usual, little disclaimer right here.
THIS IS NOT ADVICE TO GO DO ANYTHING ILLEGAL. DO NOT BREAK THE LAW. DO NOT CONSIDER BREAKING THE LAW. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS OR MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY INSURRECTIONIST MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT ADVOCATE FOR ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS, MOVEMENTS, OR IDEAOLOGIES. PLEASE DON’T DRONE STRIKE ME.
Key Principles.
Prior to getting into the various forms of area denial and how they are employed, the key ideas behind it need to be explained. Beginning with the economy of effort. That is to say, the goal of creating the greatest effect with the least amount of effort. If we want to stop an enemy in an area, you can position an army in an area but that requires men, supplies, logistics, weapons, and more that you have to take away from other areas. Instead, if you can leave behind a series of traps with only a handful of men, you maximize your defensive capabilities without having to throw piles of resources at the issue.
Area denial is also a very robust strategy that can be used in rural or urban environments, different strategies and tools can be employed in different environments. Whether the force is denying a road in a mountainous area or a series of fields in the flatlands of Iowa, area denial can be employed to great success.
Area denial strategies also synergize well with other common defensive measures and can create overall plans of defense that are iron clad despite having limited equipment or manpower. For example, making use of observation posts operating as an observer for an FPV unit or an ambush that triggers when an enemy unit triggers a trap. This allows the already amplified force to be multiplied by an even greater factor.
Finally, is the psychological impact that area denial tactics have. Creating a zone of alienation that units cannot enter lest they put themselves in peril creates a heavy sense of unease in the enemy, weakening their fighting spirit. Couple this with any losses gained in the area, it can force smaller sized units in the area to think twice about entering the area and overall hurt the morale of the enemy.
🧵In a SHTF scenario, you won’t have air support or armor. You’ll have a few neighbors and a plan.
If that plan doesn’t include a dedicated Support by Fire element, you’ve already lost the initiative.
The math of the maneuver: 🧵
Support by Fire
Mutual fire support is three words that can mean a lot of things. It encompasses any form of direct or indirect forms of fire support. It can come from artillery and mortars, naval guns, CAS, and drones. It also has another form that is less discussed, the art of support by fire (I stole that phrasing from an infantry magazine).
Support by fire is conducted by a maneuver force or unit wherein the goal is to physically observe the enemy and engage them with direct and indirect fires. For the purposes of this article, the focus will be primarily focused on direct fire as I have no knowledge of weapon systems such as javelins, Bradley IFVs, TOW missiles, or main battle tanks. Support by fire is best conducted by a separate team supporting a primary assaulting team but the battlespace can be very fluid and demanding on limited resources. Support by fire can be conducted either as a form of mutual support (elements assisting each other reciprocally) or as a standard form of support.
A support by fire mission can be a lifesaving operation for a unit that is either about to attack an enemy element or is actively defending against one.
As usual, little disclaimer right here. THIS IS NOT ADVICE TO GO DO ANYTHING ILLEGAL. DO NOT BREAK THE LAW. DO NOT CONSIDER BREAKING THE LAW. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS OR MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY INSURRECTIONIST MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT ADVOCATE FOR ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS, MOVEMENTS, OR IDEAOLOGIES. PLEASE DON’T DRONE STRIKE ME.
Recon and Preparation.
Prior to the actual engagement where the team will be employed, the team leader needs to perform a reconnoiter of the area where they will be supporting the attacking team. The leader needs to take things into account such as terrain, cover, concealment, sightlines, the enemy’s location, and the location of the team they are supporting. The team leader needs to weigh all of these factors to best identify where their team will set up to engage the enemy while ensuring their own ability to defend themselves.
Once the team leader has identified the location, they need to move their team up to the last piece of hard cover or concealment prior to reaching the point and have the team ready up. This is a good time for the team to cache any excess materials they may be carrying such as a heavy ruck or assault pack loaded with MREs.
Following this, the team must advance undetected to the point they will be supporting from. This is crucial because if the team is discovered, they risk falling under enemy fire and preventing their ability to conduct their support mission. Ideally, this means a low crawl. It sucks. It’s slow. It’s a hassle. But it is better than risking discovery.
Once the team has arrived, the team leader needs to determine the emplacement of their team elements. The calculus of this changes depending on the quantity and type of weapons systems and men at his disposal. If the team is setting up with an emplaced machine gun, things are different than say, three automatic riflemen and a guy with an M203. A team leader will employ the use of the dumbest acronym ever developed OKOCA (sometimes OCOKA, sometimes OCKAO, I have seen it in like 8 forms at this point lol) for this exact moment. OKOCA stands for O – observation and fields of fire, K – key terrain, O – obstacles, C – cover and concealment, and A – avenues of approach.
🧵A lot of you are terminally blackpilled. You are doing exactly what they want.
The incessant and obscene messaging is rooted in a 70-year-old blueprint for breaking the human will, rooted in the Korean War.
Understand the mechanisms and break yourself and others free:
Modern social engineering is a very refined version of the Thought Reform techniques the Chinese pioneered during the Korean War.
In these camps, beatings and physical torture took second chair to mental anguish and group ostracization.
The same tools that were utilized to try and create human robots that would espouse Chinese communism over 70 years ago are still being utilized today to manipulate populations and society as a whole.
First, we need to establish the history of this procedure and what it initially entailed...
Thought Reform and Brainwashing During the Korean War.
After capturing US soldiers, the Chinese military interned these men into camps where they were focused on turning them into tools of the state. Soldiers that would admit to crimes they did not commit such as saying they used chemical or biological agents in the field to hurt the United States on the international stage. The theory also held that after returning them home, the soldiers would carry their new programming and spread it among the US, leading to a communist revolt such as the one conducted by Mao. There were 7 key aspects to the Chinese brainwashing program. They were as follows: milieu control, mystical manipulation, confession, self-sanctification through purity, loading the language, doctrine over person, and dispensing of existence. We will delve into each of these.
It’s no surprise that most people in the US and Western civilization as a whole are not physically active enough. Many people are overweight, have little muscle endurance, and absolutely no cardiovascular ability. By not maintaining some basic level of physical fitness one is put at much higher risk for various health conditions such as heart disease, strokes, type 2 diabetes, and a number of cancers by up to 40% in some cases. From a more practical and less abstract approach, US Army data shows that soldiers with higher aerobic capacity and muscle endurance had less non-combat injuries in the field, as well as being more effective in their roles in the field.
From a prepping perspective, not being mildly to moderately fit puts yourself at a massive disadvantage and makes one a liability. Fitness means you can do the physical tasks such as walking home with a 30 pound get-home (bug out) bag, it means you can haul water from a body to your home for purification, it means you can cut up and remove the fallen tree after the tornado in your front yard, it means you can properly engage a potential threat if the fight lasts longer than a minute. Prepping is often thought of a “hobby” where you are just hoarding goods and items (something I have fought vehemently against and wrote 2 books because of it), as a byproduct of that mentality, the body is often neglected. Both from a medical perspective and a fitness perspective. Prepping is as much about “weathering the storm,” as it is about being able to effectively operate after it. You can’t be a basement shut-in forever.
Thankfully getting a basic level of fitness doesn’t require you to become a psychopath who lives in the gym and eats nothing but liver and chicken breast for ever meal. You can make minor adjustments that grow your abilities with TIME without even needing a gym membership! Americans tend to want to go hard and fast with things, expecting instant results, this is one of the many cases where that is not realistic. To become better we must slowly build ourselves up. The purpose of this piece is to help those who are just starting find initiative, assess their current abilities, build a weekly exercise regimen, and then stick to it. I also want to briefly touch on diet at the tail end of this.
Assessing Current Abilities.
Before determining what sort of exercise plan one is going to adhere to, they need to determine what their current abilities are. This unfortunately is a usually a very humbling experience and needs to happen. Without knowing what one’s limitations are, they risk injury, overtraining, or wasting time on an inappropriate plan.
Cardiovascular endurance can be tested in a high impact and low impact test, ideally one performs both. The high impact test begins with a 5 minute walk, then try to cover 1.5 miles as fast as one can without harming themselves. This does not mean push yourself beyond your limits and risk injury. If you need to stop or walk, that’s okay. After achieving 1.5 miles the time taken is noted and checked against a generic reference. If it takes less than 13 minutes, one is an above average point for a beginner, for between 13 and 16 minutes, that is a relatively average start point, and if it is longer than 16 minutes, they are below average (and that is okay!). The low impact test is a 6 minute walk on a flat surface and after 6 minutes the distance is noted, healthy adults often exceed 500 to 600 meters (~1600-1900 feet). Note all of this information for the next section and for goal planning.
Testing muscular strength likewise is a relatively quick process and does not require any specific equipment, bodyweight is a decent enough baseline. Begin with testing pushups, see how many you can do without breaking form. If you can’t even do one, try knee pushups, if you can’t do one, try against a wall! Then try squats, perform as many as you can in one set. Then try a pull up if you have a pull-up bar (very cheap online and cheaper if bought used), if you cannot do one, try a flexed arm hang, if you can’t do longer than a second, note it. Finally try a forearm plank and hold it as long as you can with good form. Note all of this information for the next section and for goal planning.
You can also test your mobility and flexibility with a sit and reach test where you sit flat on the ground, legs extended, knees straight, and reach forward. Not being able to reach past your toes is generally regarded as a negative score and is something to work on.
If your buddy took a GSW RIGHT NOW—could you actually keep them alive until help arrived? Or would your lack of basic combat medicine skills get them killed? 🧵
Combat medicine saves lives yet many shooters have no idea how to do it in a calm setting, much less under pressure...
Quick disclaimer. I AM NOT A DOCTOR. THIS IS NOT MEDICAL ADVICE. SEEK ALL MEDICAL TREATMENT FROM A PROFESSIONAL! This article provides basic educational information only and does not substitute professional medical training or advice. Always seek proper medical training from qualified instructors. The author is not liable for any actions taken based on the information provided.
Basic Combat Medicine for the Every(rifle)man
Combat medicine is a topic that is rarely discussed despite it being lifesaving at its core. It is often ignored or forgotten in favor of trusting that a medic will be nearby when the unthinkable happens. Unfortunately, that isn’t always the case and sometimes the basic actions taken by non-medical teammates can save the life of someone in dire need. Thankfully in recent years tourniquets have clamped their way down into the zeitgeist but as we’ll discuss, there are other basic measures that should be known, understood, and practiced by the average rifleman so they have the skills to save the lives of their comrades or even themselves.