Drop Site Profile picture
Nov 17, 2024 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
🧵REPORT:

1/ On Wednesday, November 13, Secretary Blinken, in the ongoing effort by the Biden administration to place all blame for the lack of a ceasefire deal on Hamas, claimed the group had been so unwilling to negotiate in good faith that “Qatar had told them to leave” the country.

But, just days earlier, on November 9, Qatar’s foreign ministry had issued a statement calling the reports “inaccurate.” ⬇️
2/ The reports seem to have originated with Israel’s public broadcaster Kan on November 8, citing three sources “familiar with the matter.” Image
Image
3/ The story quickly spread, picked up by major western outlets like Financial Times and CNN. Each cited a senior Biden administration official, with FT also quoting “a person familiar with the matter.”

🔗Link to FT: ft.com/content/0d9dc9…

🔗Link to CNN: amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/11/08…Image
Image
4/ Hamas quickly denied the reports, calling them “baseless” and a “pressure tactic.” This denial was reported in the western press as early as November 8, but it was largely dismissed. For an example, see how CNN handled the story. Image
Image
5/ Later that day, Qatar’s foreign ministry issued a pointed rebuke, rejecting the claim that they had ordered Hamas’s office shut as “inaccurate,” and accusing Israel of “blackmailing” and “manipulating” the situation to “continue the war for narrow political gain.”
6/ Senior Hamas official Dr. Bassem Naim also rejected the claim in an interview on Thursday with Sky News. The interview underscores how the narrative that Hamas was to blame had already been reinforced through the misleading claim. Listen: 👇🏼
7/ Fast forward to Blinken — in the video shared above, the US Secretary of State was speaking in Brussels, four days after Qatar had publicly refuted the claims. Yet, the US’s top diplomat chose to reiterate them in a press conference before international media.

—————

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drop Site

Drop Site Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DropSiteNews

May 8
🚨NEW | The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) — For Aid and Occupation

A newly formed and U.S.-backed private foundation forms the backbone of Israel’s new plan to control all humanitarian aid entering Gaza—68 days into a total siege that has driven the territory into catastrophic hunger.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) is being marketed as a secure and efficient alternative to traditional UN and NGO pipelines which Israel has systematically attacked and sought to dismantle. Staffed by U.S. military veterans, former officials, and corporate financiers, GHF promises to deliver aid to 1.2 million Palestinians through privately secured distribution hubs, with plans to expand to more than 2 million.

A closer look at the Foundation’s presentation documents obtained by Axios indicates it is likely to serve as a foreign-controlled proxy to militarize aid, sideline Palestinian institutions, and entrench a system of occupation under the guise of neutrality.

Here’s what to know: 🧵🔽Image
1. The Operational Model: Armored Aid Hubs and Biometric Control

GHF says it will establish four Secure Distribution Sites (SDS) inside Gaza, each designed to serve up to 300,000 people with food, water, hygiene kits, and medical supplies—scaling up to more than 2 million people over time. These aid hubs will be protected by private security contractors, not the Israeli military—but GHF states openly that all movement will be coordinated with the IDF and COGAT.

Aid, once inside the hub, will be distributed “with no eligibility requirements” and “based solely on need,” GHF says. But access to these hubs will first require passing through Israeli-controlled corridors—where biometric screening, facial recognition technology, and Israeli military approval apply. Once inside, aid is handed out; outside, access is filtered.

New reporting by Le Temps reveals that the broader Israeli plan will allow only 60 aid trucks per day into Gaza—ten times less than what entered during a brief ceasefire earlier this year. Armed personnel will oversee access to the aid zones, checking names and possibly screening individuals deemed “suspicious.”

Rights groups warn this creates a system of militarized aid—with the GHF footing the bill for private mercenary forces and operating under an Israeli security framework, not a humanitarian one.Image
Image
2. A New Foreign Architecture for Gaza: Who’s Running It?

The organization is led entirely by U.S. and international actors, with no Palestinians involved in the leadership or oversight of the project.

It includes:
➤ Jake Wood, Executive Director (Team Rubicon founder, U.S. Marine Corps veteran)
➤ David Burke, Chief Operating Officer
➤ John Acree, Head of Mission (ex-USAID)

Board members include:
➤ Nate Mook, former CEO of World Central Kitchen
➤ Raisa Sheynberg, ex-U.S. Treasury (terrorist financing), now Mastercard VP
➤ Jonathan Foster, Wall Street financier
➤ Loik Henderson, corporate governance lawyer

Advisory board includes military and diplomatic officials, including:
➤ LTG Mark Schwartz, former U.S. Security Coordinator for Israel/PA
➤ Bill A. Miller, former UN and U.S. security official
➤ David Beasley, former head of the World Food Programme (pending confirmation)

Formally registered just months ago in Geneva, according to Le Temps, the group was incorporated with a Swiss lawyer, a U.S.-based legal consultant, and an Armenian financier on its board—none of whom have a background in humanitarian work.

There are no Palestinians in GHF’s governance or operational leadership.Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
May 7
Israel killed over 100 people in Gaza today.

This is what U.S.-made weapons did to people eating at a restaurant and shopping in a crowded Gaza City market.
5 were killed and several others injured—mostly women and children—after an Israeli airstrike targeted the home of the Rayan family in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza.

More children were brutally killed in an airstrike east of Khan Younis
Read 7 tweets
May 5
🇵🇸THREAD: “How Hamas Sees the Current Moment”

In an exclusive interview with Drop Site News—and in one of the most extensive English-language discussions with a senior Hamas official published by a Western outlet—Osama Hamdan spoke to @JeremyScahill about genocide, resistance, direct U.S. talks, and why disarmament in ceasefire negotiations remains a ‘million red lines’ for Hamas.

Below are 7 quotes from the interview that reveal how Hamas views this moment. 🧵🔽Image
1. On Why Israel Fears Hamas Talking Directly to the U.S.:

“I believe one of the reasons why the Israelis have assassinated some of the Palestinian leaders, it was because they have the chance to talk directly to the United States.

They want to prevent any kind of contact between the Palestinian resistance and the United States administration because they have a narrative that those are terrorists.

But when they talk to the administration, the administration discovered that they are freedom fighters and they have a political narrative and they have a political stand, and they are seeking to have a political solution. This is what the Israelis are trying to prevent, and this is what, I believe, the United States administration and the congressmen, they have to understand and they have to go to work according to that.”
2. On Whether a Ceasefire Would Have Happened if Kamala Harris Had Won the Election

“Well, I think it helped. If Kamala Harris won the elections, I think it will be the same policy of the Biden administration policy, which supported the Israelis totally, which they considered themselves as a part, which was not considered by Hamas or the Palestinians, but they bring themselves as a part of the war and the fight against the Palestinians.

We know that the Trump people, they have done a good job in order to make [the January ceasefire] happen. But it's not enough. We have to be honest and serious, it's not enough. When the meetings with Adam Boehler took place, there was a real possibility. This is why the Israelis were furious and they were angry.”
Read 11 tweets
May 4
THREAD: On Monday, the House will vote on H.R. 867—a bill expanding the 2018 Anti-Boycott Act to cover boycotts promoted by the UN or other international governmental bodies.

But under current law, U.S. companies and individuals are already barred from complying with, or even failing to report boycott requests if they fall under boycotts promoted by foreign governments.

Here’s how U.S. law is being enforced to shield apartheid Israel from pressure: 🔽🧵Image
Image
1. Kuwait Airways (2020)
Fined $700,000 for refusing to sell tickets to Israeli passport holders on its JFK–London route.

That refusal—part of Kuwait’s national policy—was enforced on U.S. soil. Under the 2018 law, foreign state-owned companies operating in the U.S. are prohibited from participating in foreign boycotts of Israel.Image
2. Forta Corporation (2023)
Fined ~$45,000 after agreeing to a UAE customer’s request to provide written certification that “no labor, capital, parts or raw material of Israeli origin [were] used” in the manufacture of the goods being shipped.

Forta is a U.S. manufacturer of synthetic fiber reinforcement used in roads and concrete. This certification amounted to furnishing prohibited boycott-related information.

It also failed to report the boycott request to the Commerce Department.

The UAE at that time participated in the boycott of Israel, and the request reflected a common boycott clause.Image
Read 10 tweets
May 3
🚨NEWS: The House is set to vote Monday on H.R. 867, the “IGO Anti-Boycott Act,” which would punish Americans with fines of up to $1 million or prison terms up to 20 years for participating in boycotts of Israel or Israeli settlements that are promoted by international governmental organizations (IGOs), such as the UN or EU.

The bill, sponsored by pro-Israel lawmaker Rep. Mike Lawler, expands U.S. anti-boycott law to target voluntary, values-based political action by U.S. citizens. Its aim is to shield Israel from nonviolent international pressure campaigns such as BDS.

Rights groups say the legislation criminalizes constitutionally protected political expression and is part of a broader push to suppress opposition to Israeli genocide, apartheid, and illegal settlement expansion, under the guise of fighting antisemitism.
Here are plausible examples of how H.R. 867 could lead to Americans being penalized or criminalized for entirely voluntary, values-based actions:

1. A small business owner declines to stock settlement-made wine
A grocery store owner in California chooses not to sell wines produced in Israeli settlements in the West Bank, citing international law violations. If this decision aligns with an IGO recommendation—like one from the UN Human Rights Council—that could trigger penalties under H.R. 867.

2. A church follows a faith-based boycott policy
A progressive Christian denomination issues a statement encouraging its congregants to avoid doing business with companies operating in occupied Palestinian territory. A church member who follows that guidance could be seen as participating in an IGO-aligned boycott.

3. A student group urges divestment from settlement-linked companies
A campus group encourages their university to drop contracts with companies that provide services to Israeli settlements, citing recommendations from the UN. Under H.R. 867, participating students could be investigated for promoting a prohibited boycott.

4. An individual cancels a catering order over settlement goods
Someone discovers that a catering company sources its ingredients from Israeli settlements and cancels the order, referencing a UN database of companies operating in occupied territory. That personal decision could be framed as a violation.

5. A journalist publishes a “do not buy” guide
A writer publishes a guide listing companies involved in the occupation and encourages consumers to avoid them, referencing data from the Palestinian government. The act of publishing and advocating such a list could be penalized for promoting a boycott.

6. An investor divests from a company on ethical grounds
An American investor chooses to sell stock in a corporation doing business in Israeli settlements after reading an EU report urging businesses to withdraw. This divestment, if linked to IGO guidance, could be treated as illegal under the bill.
Read 4 tweets
May 3
🧵NEW: Armed gangs are looting food warehouses across Gaza—and Israeli drones are reportedly targeting the police and volunteers trying to stop them.

Multiple sources, including eyewitnesses and journalists, say the gangs are backed by Israel.

Here’s what’s being reported: 🔽
2/ @TareqAzzom Gaza correspondent for Al Jazeera English, reports:
▪️ “Local gangs, reportedly backed by Israel, are looting what remains of Gaza’s food warehouses.”
▪️ Israeli forces, he says, have struck police officers who were trying to stop the thefts. Image
3/ One of the clearest firsthand accounts comes from a volunteer at a community kitchen in western Gaza.

He says armed gangs attacked their facility twice in one day.
The second time, they fired live rounds and broke into a food store serving 1,500+ families.

[Instagram story from @madhoun95]Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(