The 1918 flu wiped out 90% of adults in Brevig Mission, Alaska. 🧵
It carried a key mutation: PB2 E627K.
Now, H5N1 is showing signs of similar adaptation.
The strain detected in a Canadian teenager also carries PB2 E627K.
1/
In 1918, this mutation was pivotal in the virus’s jump from birds to humans and its ability to spread rapidly.
Despite lacking other mutations (Q226L / G228S) commonly associated with avian viruses adapting to human-like receptors, the 1918 virus exploited the mutations it had to devastating effect.
The Canadian teen also carries D190E, a mutation linked to altered receptor binding preference.
While H5 viruses typically bind to avian-type receptors, this mutation shifts the virus toward binding human-like receptors.
A critical step in zoonotic transmission.
3/
These mutations in isolation don’t guarantee sustained human-to-human transmission.
But they significantly increase the virus’s ability to infect and replicate in humans.
4/
Combined with evidence of mammalian infections (such as cow infections, mass die-offs in seals and minks) the virus appears to be adapting to mammalian hosts.
This is concerning because mammalian adaptation creates the conditions for further mutations, such as Q226L / G228S, which could enable efficient transmission BETWEEN HUMANS.
You’re not genuinely worried about some profound moral principle.
You’re irritated that you still have to inconvenience yourself for the sake of others.
The real motivation here is to find a convenient moral loophole that lets you prioritize your own comfort over everyone else’s safety.
All while pretending to engage in some deep ethical debate.
2/
If you’re asking when you can take your mask off, it’s really because you don’t want to wear it anymore.
This isn’t an issue of personal judgment.
It’s an issue of responsibility.
If you want to make it about ethics, then understand that real ethics requires a willingness to prioritize the well-being of others, especially the most vulnerable.
3/
The pandemic pulled back the curtain on a brutal reality.
Our healthcare system is like a short-term investor that only cares about next quarter’s profits
1/
We’ve been treating health costs like a sprint when it’s really a marathon, and we’re now feeling the burn from all the times we didn’t stretch properly.
If anything, COVID-19 has shown that our focus on immediate, up-front costs is like budgeting for a vacation without considering the credit card bill that hits when you get home.
Spoiler alert: the real expenses pile up once the hangover wears off.
2/
For years, we’ve been content to look at the price tag of an illness as if it were a one-time purchase.
We focus on the direct costs of treating the infection whether it’s a few days in a hospital bed, a round of antibiotics, or a stint on a ventilator while glossing over the fact that the long-term consequences could rack up a tab that makes those initial bills look like pocket change.
3/
The normalization of disaster is eroding our willingness to demand meaningful change 🧵
1/
We’ve come to see mass culling, market shutdowns, and disrupted supply chains as a normal part of life in the 21st century.
2/
If disease outbreaks are just the cost of doing business, then we lose the incentive to push for a system where these risks are minimized rather than managed.
3/