Watching #BerlinWall - 3 2 hr episodes about 3 sisters around the time of the fall of the Berlin Wall, the wall that, in my childhood, we thought would stand forever. However - in a lesson we seem to have forgotten terribly quickly - walls between us never last forever.
The end of this episode arrived at 9 November 1989, a date that will give me chills till the day I die. Even now, I know it was Thursday because my friend Lou had committed suicide 5 days before on Saturday, 4 November 1989.
I was still reeling, and I sat in front of the television, unable to look away, unable to push down that sprig of hope, that feeling of joy, even as I wished that Lou could see this.
The next night, @DanRather, the second news anchor of my life (my first being Walter Cronkite)
was in Berlin and scaled the wall.
The hope. The joy. The belief that after decades of the Cold War, there was light, and hope, and maybe it was almost over and a clear march to a liberal world order, freedom and prosperity for all, peace.
But we forgot. We forgot that our stability had been rooted in there being a single axis of good and evil, that crystal clarity and we forgot to be vigilant and do the work to root that stability, to build the infrastructure for the world we hoped would be.
So much happened: the Iron Curtain fell, South Africa's apartheid regime fell, Northern Ireland brokered peace.
But we forgot a law of physics and life: every action has an equal and opposite reaction. And we are there now, in a place much darker than we hoped it would be,
but still on that pilgrimage to freedom.
It is dark, and it has been dark for a long time, but no little of that is reckoning with past evil and ugly truths we've avoided for centuries, millennia even. That may not feel like a good thing, but it is the needed medicine.
Stay - as on those days leading up to the 9th, we are standing together.
As Rachel Remen's grandfather would remind us, the journey to freedom from slavery is too precious for Him to leave to an angel - He will always lead that walk Himself.
He's out in front.
Hang on.
@threadreaderapp unroll, por favor. Shookria!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Really, @UniofOxford? Our ecumenical student outreach worker-*an Oxford alumna*-was supposed to work a stall at the Fresher's Fair today. Had her work ID, OU alumni card, current stallholder to vouch for her, & didn't get in b/c she didn't have a student or staff Bod card. WTF?
You can say this is about the protests, but the stupidity of this is that *your students were the ones protesting*. So...banning alumni is dumb?
Also, nowhere in the stallholders regulations does it say stall minders need to be OU students or staff. IN FACT, the subtext is 2/
they don't.
14. All student stallholders and attendees of the Fair are expected to abide by the University of Oxford conduct regulations, including the Code of Discipline, which can be found here.
AND
19. Stallholders are required to cooperate at all times
So. After the gazillionth time I've said to a Catholic religious (that is, a nun or brother/priest in an order, not a 'religious Catholic'), 'What on G-d's green earth is going on in your formation?' I think it's time to write a thread. 1/
I think we currently fundamentally misunderstand what formation is. It is NOT fitting every person to a cookie cutter expectation of what the ideal priest or religious member of that order looks like. It isn't lopping off bits of them to fit. That's deadly to G-d's world. 2/
G-d created profligate diversity. To force creation into a sameness, to subjugate it to a single will, is diametrically opposed to His will. It's a sin.
I'm going to borrow an analogy from one of my favourite authors, Rachel Remen: rosebushes.
3/
I have a confession to make. For the last 4 months. I have quietly hidden ex-students' posts from my FB feed. I'm not usually one for avoidance, but I knew that if I saw what many of them were posting, we probably couldn't come back from that.
And I want to still love them.
I don't want to think, 'You are racist, sociopathic human beings who will forget your own ancestors' suffering the minute you have power to trample over others to get what you want, oppressing them, taking their land, cheering their starvation & murder.' 2/
'Please, let me believe this troubles you, that you want it to change.'
That changed for one ex-student after he staked out a 'just but brutal war' is necessary position, later doubling down on it. That he had (though forgiven when he asked, years later) drawn a picture of me
It is the 43rd anniversary of the death of one of Bollywood's iconic singers - he died at 55 in 1980, right after we'd seen him in concert. There's a picture of me with him somewhere. Have a taste of #MohammedRafi
@JS_Diaspora @JavariaFarooqui @aliawhs
Aw man, this one. CLASSIC. #MohammedRafi
Forever a favourite to belt out whenever you've been betrayed. 'What happened to your promise?' #MohammedRafi @ProfSunnySingh (Meant to tag you in the first one!)
I've often thought how G-d created the universe tells us something about Him & how we should approach it & our lives. Key things here for me:
1. Always in process 2. Tends towards balance - *dynamic balance*, not static - e.g., our blood pH is maintained by a buffer system:
1/
It's always in motion, in the same way a pendulum must be in motion to keep time. And in both, there is something else: how MUCH movement? You can't have the pendulum bashing out the sides of the clock or the buffer rapidly cycling. Nor can you have barely any movement. 2/
The buffer reacts to signals from pH sensors in the medulla oblangata; it doesn't hare off on its own. A pendulum must be regulated to keep the correct time: hitting the sides of the clock or barely moving doesn't fulfil its function of keeping time.
3/
H/T @Prof_RBW
“A sentimentalist is simply one who wants to have the luxury of an emotion without paying for it. We think we can have our emotions for nothing. We cannot...As soon as you have to pay for an emotion you will know its quality, & be the better for such knowledge. 1/
We cannot...As soon as you have to pay for an emotion you will know its quality, and be the better for such knowledge. And remember that the sentimentalist is always a cynic at heart. Indeed, sentimentality is merely the bank holiday of cynicism.”
― Oscar Wilde, De Profundis
2/
And you wonder why I despise sentimentality - evangelical, tradcath BS, Hallmark, patriotism, all of that cheaply manipulative emotional shit. It's reading a script & pretending emotion, not living it.
It reminds me of Kenneth Branagh as Reinhard Heydrich in 'Conspiracy' 3/