A friend asked me to explain DNA, RNA, and epigenetics. he said that others had tried before, but it didn’t click for him.
I happen to play the piano, so I gave him a simple, albeit imperfect, analogy.
After this analogy, he finally understood! Here’s the piano analogy.
🧵
Imagine a piano with 30,000 keys. Each key represents a gene.
Nearly all of your somatic cells have the exact same piano—the same keys, the same genes. So why does a nerve cell look different from a cheek cell?
Because they’re playing different pieces on the identical pianos.
The piano is just a set of keys! The music—the composition—is the result of playing specific keys in a particular sequence and rhythm.
Pressing a key to play a note is like expressing a gene to produce mRNA.
Playing a note multiple times => multiple mRNA molecules from that gene.
Within a cell, the pattern of mRNA expression changes over time, just like the notes change over time in a musical score.
At any given moment, a fraction of the keys are being played.
Epigenetics is like the way the piano is played.
Some keys are easy to press; others harder to reach or require more effort.
Some keys might be muted or locked in certain cells; impossible to play there but functional in others. some keys play indirectly when you press another.
These differences to a key, like heavier key, muted key, hard to reach key, can be written on the keys themselves (for one cell). Here’s a register of various epigenetic changes in “keys”
As before, this register may change based on cell, type of cell, etc.
These performances are recorded into songs, much like proteins are synthesized based on mRNA templates.
Proteins are the final products—they have specific structures and functions, giving cells their unique characteristics.
The mRNA (the notes you play) might degrade quickly, but the proteins (the recorded songs) can remain in the cell as long as needed.
So, even though every cell has the same “piano,” the diverse “music” played leads to different cell types and functions.
I hope this analogy makes DNA, RNA, and epigenetics clearer!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
are we sure we want to say this when the trade war is against china specifically?
i am actually a hardware and a biotech startup founder, so i feel i have the right to express MY opinion. this is a SHORT summary. 🧵
A lot of people say we need China for biotech and hardware. But as a founder in both fields, here’s why that argument might be flawed; and what China could fix, but won’t.
i understand a lot of businesses depend on china for manufacturing, but i am trying to provide a counter argument to express what needs to be fixed for the ideal circumstances.
hint: it is FIXABLE terms, which china can actually CHOOSE to follow, but routinely refuses to do
I didn’t hear them when they attacked Indians and Hindus incessantly. Christmas to new year.
I didn’t hear anything. Except anti H1B narratives. From those who are not against illegal immigration.
Just because you don’t like us, doesn’t mean it was not, for the first time, hard for me to go outside and feel ok. Bernie Sanders called it “indentured servitude” and then nothing.
I hated my skin for a few days. I felt afraid. I got death threats. I was told I will get deported, over and over again. You said nothing.
The silence is deafening, and if it weren’t for the technologists, no one except us. That’s who was for us.
Your anti racism disappeared when the immigration narrative became about legal immigration. You aren’t virtuous. You are merely vengeful.
Even the e/acc movement defended us and then said “they’ll come after AI next which is why I defend you.” I will remember that.
The funny thing about being an Indian woman is that they will say disgusting, horrifying things about you, and most people will act like nothing happened at all. The ones who stand up for you will say that they don’t see color.
And that’s fine. But don’t you dare ever come to me and tell me you care for racism.
Don’t laugh at us and tell me you ever cared. You didn’t.
The lesson I learned that day is that no one cares and no one will.
In a surprising paper published in Nature, scientists accomplished what sounds impossible: using genes from a single-celled organism to create mouse stem cells, which eventually developed into a living, breathing mouse.
Animal multicellularity emerged ~700mn years ago.
The genes in this study—from choanoflagellates, ancient single-celled organisms—are somewhat of evolutionary relics.
They predate multicellular life and now appear to have played a foundational role in animal development.
Choanoflagellates don’t form stem cells, but they have versions of Sox and POU genes.
In animals, these same genes drive pluripotency—the ability of stem cells to turn into any cell type.