Ipswich Town-Manchester United Tactical Analysis: (a thread)
▪️What did we learn from Ruben Amorim's first game?
I felt like most of the game was based around whether or not Man Utd could break Ipswich's press. For different reasons it was sometimes successful but often not, though at the very least you could see the players were doing what Amorim wanted to do even if the execution was off
For the goal, United successfully attracted Ipswich's press high up the pitch and when the full-back pressed Diallo, Fernandes was free in the half-space attracting Ipswich's centre-back, creating space for Diallo to burst into and cross for the goal
For large periods, United found progression tough as Ipswich surrounded Eriksen-Casemiro, and as their front 3 pressed United's back three, there was always a player in front of one of the advanced 10 attackers (Fernandes) blocking the pass off or a defender stepped out
With either a defender following Fernandes-Garnacho it made central progression difficult, as this is the key way to get the ball into attack through Amorim's style. Leading United to having to often look wide to progress the ball, with the wide Ipswich forward closing down a FB
With Casemiro-Eriksen marked and a forward closing down Dalot, what worked is whenever Dalot stayed wide or high and Garnacho would drag Tuanzebe in then out running off him to create space. Ipswich's press was good and pushed United back but this is 1 method to explore more
Because of Ipswich's press sticking tight to the players in the half-spaces, often United were pushed back and it's why we saw them go long often to Rashford. It was players getting used to a system but also not really having an answer to a good game plan from Mckenna
There were some occasions where they were able to pull Davis wide to Diallo and get Fernandes into the half-space but whenever they did, either execution was off (bad touch, stray pass) or decision-making in the final third was lacking. Again, right blueprint, bad result
United want more of the above to happen, as this is how they'll score most of their goals under Amorim, but a cause for concern may be that Ipswich when dropping Hutchinson were a threat, especially with Casemiro slow to mark the central midfielder in the press
With United's front 3 pressing Ipswich's defence, Casemiro is slow to press Morsy, or whenever Hutchinson dropped, he would dive in too quickly with him evading the Brazilian, add in the fact Evans was instructed to close him down deep in his own half and he was a huge threat
Just behind United's 3-2 press, Hutchinson would pick the ball up and dribble past Evans, you would think that with Ugarte and Martinez in instead of Casemiro and Evans, it could tighten the press up a little but Ipswich were smart, had a plan and executed it well
On the plus side, Amorim's early 2nd half changes were clearly to stop these attacks and gain control back in the 2nd half, pushing Fernandes deeper and bringing Ugarte on, United had more control but similarly again, the patterns of getting a 10 in the half space were awry
Bad decision-making/execution contributed to this but at the very least, Ipswich's attacks were quelled. With players to return the build-up has more possibilities, but Ipswich were brilliant without the ball, as time goes by though United will get better at these patterns
I think Amorim ran into a manager who setup well vs his style of play and finding solutions to progress vs teams that setup will is going to be crucial
End of thread! Apologies for the delay, the graphics took a while.
Newsletter in bio, would love to hear your thoughts!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Manchester United-Manchester City: Analysis (a thread)
▪️How Michael Carrick nullified Pep Guardiola, comprehensively beating City
Whilst in attack United were fast. direct, had pace on the wings and up front as well as there best player playing in his best position, it was without the ball where United stopped City then wasted no time in going forward.
City tried to build-up with a wide 3 and often, Rodri and Bernardo were wary that they weren't creating space as they both dropped deeper. But the 4 in midfield and 2 up top sitting off kept the middle compact and the wide wingers of Semenyo-Doku quiet.
Analysing Ruben Amorim's 4-3-3/4-2-4 Manchester United vs Bournemouth (a thread):
Has the Portuguese manager finally shifted and is it worth the risk?
▪️Advantages, weaknesses
▪️Overlapping defenders
There was reports from before the game that Amorim was finally shifting his coveted 3-4-3 to a 4-3-3. It was pretty clear throughout the game and early on vs Bournemouth that there had been a tactical shift that offered more flexibility and made United more unpredictable.
Teams normally press United's back 3 with their own front 3. But because there was no longer a wide full-back pushed up the pitch and more of a flat back 4, there was an option to pass to wide as well as space for Casemiro in the middle of the pitch with Fernandes pushed up
Newcastle United-Arsenal: Tactical Analysis (a thread)
How Arsenal used central half-space wingers giving them variety in attack.
The positioning of Trossard and Eze centrally meant there was always two players in behind Newcastle United's midfield and offered Arsenal a threat, because whenever there was a gap in Newcastle's midfield, a line-breaking pass from defence would find a player in the middle.
It's interesting because playing Newcastle away is meant to be one of the toughest tests of an attack particularly with how Arsenal struggled to create last season, but with this tweak it means they can drag players wide (Trossard) and find players in the half-space (Merino)
Manchester United-Arsenal: Tactical Analysis Thread
▪️Bayindir cutting through Arsenal's press
▪️Man Utd's pressing
It's wildly ironic that Bayindir's mistake was the reason Manchester United lost but he was a huge reason United got into Arsenal's half often too. What this system does for United is create situations that make the opposition press high, as Arsenal committed players high
It led to situations like this. Bayindir would cut through Arsenal's press to find a forward for a United forward (Mbeumo) to be released in behind. The problem Arsenal had was how many men they committed in the press, as United used a dropping forward to play off of
Manchester United Pre-Season: Detailed Analysis (a thread) Part 1
▪️Improved Progression, Better Movement aided by the 10's
▪️Going direct if needed
A big problem for Man Utd last season was the stagnant, stand-still ball progression. They'd get it in defence find no space in the centre and launch it up to Hojlund in hope. There has been improvement on this in pre-season, mainly because of better movement from the 10's
Well, it's the two 10's and the midfield pivot, as you can see from below: Fernandes and Cunha are very deep, allowing the full-backs to push on but also dragging West Ham players out of position
Liverpool - Newcastle United: Tactical Analysis (a thread)
▪️How Newcastle United nullified Liverpool in the Carabao Cup final
Newcastle's press was excellent, it kept pushing Liverpool back. The key component was a full-back pushing up from defence to close down a Liverpool defender (Quansah) on the ball, just behind them meanwhile the midfield 3 matches up with Liverpool's midfield 3
As Guimarães tracked Mac Allister, Tonali would jump on Gravenberch and Joelinton tracked Szoboszlai's movements, because a Newcastle full-back would push up high it forced Liverpool long often, stopping their progression in the middle of the pitch and having them go long