Ipswich Town-Manchester United Tactical Analysis: (a thread)
▪️What did we learn from Ruben Amorim's first game?
I felt like most of the game was based around whether or not Man Utd could break Ipswich's press. For different reasons it was sometimes successful but often not, though at the very least you could see the players were doing what Amorim wanted to do even if the execution was off
For the goal, United successfully attracted Ipswich's press high up the pitch and when the full-back pressed Diallo, Fernandes was free in the half-space attracting Ipswich's centre-back, creating space for Diallo to burst into and cross for the goal
For large periods, United found progression tough as Ipswich surrounded Eriksen-Casemiro, and as their front 3 pressed United's back three, there was always a player in front of one of the advanced 10 attackers (Fernandes) blocking the pass off or a defender stepped out
With either a defender following Fernandes-Garnacho it made central progression difficult, as this is the key way to get the ball into attack through Amorim's style. Leading United to having to often look wide to progress the ball, with the wide Ipswich forward closing down a FB
With Casemiro-Eriksen marked and a forward closing down Dalot, what worked is whenever Dalot stayed wide or high and Garnacho would drag Tuanzebe in then out running off him to create space. Ipswich's press was good and pushed United back but this is 1 method to explore more
Because of Ipswich's press sticking tight to the players in the half-spaces, often United were pushed back and it's why we saw them go long often to Rashford. It was players getting used to a system but also not really having an answer to a good game plan from Mckenna
There were some occasions where they were able to pull Davis wide to Diallo and get Fernandes into the half-space but whenever they did, either execution was off (bad touch, stray pass) or decision-making in the final third was lacking. Again, right blueprint, bad result
United want more of the above to happen, as this is how they'll score most of their goals under Amorim, but a cause for concern may be that Ipswich when dropping Hutchinson were a threat, especially with Casemiro slow to mark the central midfielder in the press
With United's front 3 pressing Ipswich's defence, Casemiro is slow to press Morsy, or whenever Hutchinson dropped, he would dive in too quickly with him evading the Brazilian, add in the fact Evans was instructed to close him down deep in his own half and he was a huge threat
Just behind United's 3-2 press, Hutchinson would pick the ball up and dribble past Evans, you would think that with Ugarte and Martinez in instead of Casemiro and Evans, it could tighten the press up a little but Ipswich were smart, had a plan and executed it well
On the plus side, Amorim's early 2nd half changes were clearly to stop these attacks and gain control back in the 2nd half, pushing Fernandes deeper and bringing Ugarte on, United had more control but similarly again, the patterns of getting a 10 in the half space were awry
Bad decision-making/execution contributed to this but at the very least, Ipswich's attacks were quelled. With players to return the build-up has more possibilities, but Ipswich were brilliant without the ball, as time goes by though United will get better at these patterns
I think Amorim ran into a manager who setup well vs his style of play and finding solutions to progress vs teams that setup will is going to be crucial
End of thread! Apologies for the delay, the graphics took a while.
Newsletter in bio, would love to hear your thoughts!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Liverpool - Newcastle United: Tactical Analysis (a thread)
▪️How Newcastle United nullified Liverpool in the Carabao Cup final
Newcastle's press was excellent, it kept pushing Liverpool back. The key component was a full-back pushing up from defence to close down a Liverpool defender (Quansah) on the ball, just behind them meanwhile the midfield 3 matches up with Liverpool's midfield 3
As Guimarães tracked Mac Allister, Tonali would jump on Gravenberch and Joelinton tracked Szoboszlai's movements, because a Newcastle full-back would push up high it forced Liverpool long often, stopping their progression in the middle of the pitch and having them go long
Regardless of the fact that Liverpool had a 2nd string team, I thought Plymouth Argyle's setup was brilliant
It shows how far out of possession tactics have come when the team who are 24th in the Championship got it spot on..🧵
Plymouth Argyle's midfield four surrounded, Wataru Endo and Harvey Elliot. What this basically meant was there was no access to the middle of the pitch for Liverpool's defence, they couldn't progress the ball centrally. Nyoni was in the right place just behind their midfield..
It would be advantageous for Liverpool to find Nyoni in the half-space, but look how difficult the pass is because of Plymouth's right winger. The other think I was shocked at that was really really good from a Plymouth stand point was how brave the defence were at stepping out
I think one thing barely anyone mentions when it comes to Liverpool, is how well other players in the team apart from the forwards have excelled and join the attack. It isn't just 'ahh calmer'
They're excellent at breaking down low blocks whereas Arsenal find it difficult....
The 3 forwards pin whatever defence it is back, often joined by Trent Alexander-Arnold, meaning it's a 4v4, 1 player in Szoboszlai joins in the pockets. It's really difficult to mark against because there's almost always 1/2 players that join the 3 up top, it stretches defences
It also takes players away and adds an extra man to mark, so they can play it to another player in build-up and not lose numerical superiority in attack. Liverpool are also not waiting for one of the front 3 to do something brilliant, but rather creating space so they can thrive
How changing Zirkzee for Hojlund swung the game in Manchester United's favour vs Southampton: Analysis (a thread)
Southampton clearly did their homework, a big problem for United was whenever they would move the ball side to side. Soton's front 3 marked United's centre-backs and a full-back (Walker-Peters) would close down the United's wide full-back giving them no room wide or inside
Whichever wing the ball went to be it right or left, a Southampton midfielder always marked the inside option of Mainoo or Ugarte. The only pass on was directly up front to Hojlund who struggled hugely. The ball would get fizzed into him and Southampton would easily tackle
How Liverpool dismantled West Ham 🧵
▪️Use of 'false' 9 and roaming strikers
▪️Liverpool's press
▪️Constantly firing balls in behind
One tweak Arne Slot has used effectively is dropping a striker close into build-up, often this is Luis Diaz. It means it provides an extra player for Liverpool to pass to in build-up with Gravenberch-Mac Allister marked, the Colombian can drag players out of position
The crucial thing to note, is that Liverpool still have a 3v4 on West Ham's defence because Curtis Jones has pushed up to West Ham's defence, pinning them back meaning they also don't lose an extra attacker up front.
Manchester City-Manchester United: Manchester Derby Tactical Analysis (a thread)
▪️Amorim's setup out of possession
▪️United's wide progression
United's compactness was crucial in nullifying City, the front three tucking in and being compact in Amad Diallo and Mount/Fernandes meant there was less space for Gvardiol and Gundogan. It also helped in managing the two roaming 8's in Foden and De Bruyne
Whilst one of the 3 forwards tucked in to compact the space of City's 2 midfielders, Martinez stepped out to push up and close down De Bruyne. The work done by United's forwards was important because it decreased space in the middle of the pitch, if Mainoo-Ugarte needed...