Glenna Goldis Profile picture
Nov 28, 2024 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Boy wore a shirt to school that said "there are only two genders." School censored him. He sued (free speech). Ended up at federal 1st Circuit.

Lawyer for school: This message that there is just two genders is vile, and it says to someone who is nonbinary, You do not exist.
/1
/2
Judge David Barron asked the school's lawyer, What if the shirt said "male is not a gender"?

School lawyer: The administrators would have to think, well, is that attacking a core identity? Probably not. Male is not a gender.
/3
Boy's lawyer argued the school was not inclusive to him when it called his views hateful. Judge Barron again:

"No one was saying HIS gender didn't exist!"
4/
The First Circuit ruled for the censorious school. The boy is seeking Supreme Court review.

The case is LM v. Town of Middleborough.

"Male is not a gender" comes up around 35:00-:10, yes I replayed the tape on that one.
storage.courtlistener.com/mp3/2024/02/08…
5/
I'm working on a post about LM and other 1st Circuit trans decisions. These New England judges are blazing a trail of inclusivity through the 1st amendment.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenna Goldis

Glenna Goldis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @glennagoldis

Dec 6
Hannah Barnes reports on the UK's "do you like your elbow today?" study of puberty blockers.

Let's look at her quotes from Dr. Cass, the pediatrician who pointed out no good evidence supports blocking puberty based on gender ideation.
🧵
2.
NHS is not studying less harmful alternatives to blockers (therapy) because parents are going outside the gender service to get blockers. If NHS can't compete with the black market, parents (supposedly) won't bring their kids in and it can't run a study.

1⃣ This rationale for poisoning children depends on the study being great. But it's not, it's a mess, as Barnes documents.

2⃣ Cass helped create "the environment." Her report failed to disclose the side effects of T. She didn't ask the gender doctors what a woman is. If Cass had exposed the grift and gore of gender instead of pretending it was all a big mystery, fewer parents would seek blockers on the black market.Image
3.
Cass pretends you can't study gender medicine without the cooperation of trans ideologues but that's not true.

1⃣ Point out their lies.
2⃣ Stop excusing the gender doctors' evasions and refusal to provide data about kids they already transed. Call a 🚩 a 🚩
3⃣ Don't accept that the burden of proof is on you to prove their mystical ideas don't work.Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 4
🚨
The ACLU's Chase Strangio pretends to be binary in an interview with NYT's @DouthatNYT

Some notes on her rebrand from me, a professor of Strangiology ...🧵 Image
2.
In Bostock, SCOTUS vaguely banned anti-trans discrim at work.

Do employers have to let men into the women's changing room? Or does Bostock just protect the men's right to have female names?

ACLU argues employers must pretend workers are the sex they say they are. Biden's EEOC moved to ban women-only changing rooms and "misgendering" at work, citing Bostock.

Strangio doesn't want NYT subscribers to know all that so she just talks about men fired for having the name Mary.Image
3.
What is gender?

Sorry to be a broken record but it's important. Image
Read 17 tweets
Nov 8
🚨 Schools Advised to Violate Parental Rights

In June, SCOTUS ruled that religious parents have a right to opt their K-5 children out of "LGBTQ" lessons. The case is Mahmoud.

In Mass., the governor and a private firm are advising schools they can practically ignore Mahmoud. 🧵
2.
Governor's guidance portrays Mahmoud as a narrow decision.

Instead of admitting parents are entitled to opt out, she says they can't be prevented from opting out.

Instead of admitting it's a broad decision, she emphasizes it's fact-dependent. Image
3.
The right way to advise clients on Mahmoud would be:

"See what Montgomery County did to Mahmoud? Don't do that!"

You'd list the 5 books at issue, because you know they require opt out, and quote specific SCOTUS language about why they're problematic, to help identify other lessons that might require opt out.

Gov. keeps it opaque.
Read 13 tweets
Sep 9
"I was a dope, OK ... Focus on the overall message I'm giving."

Stella and Mia's interview of Gordon Guyatt is incredible. My notes 🧵

@stellaomalley3 @_CryMiaRiver
(BTW these 2 have very different reactions to Guyatt's epic admission.)Image
2.
Guyatt is trite about pediatric gender med (PGM). Nothing new here if you've met a buffoon before.

✅ "Multidisciplinary assessments" are key
✅ "My knowledge is superficial"
✅ Cuts off knowledgeable interlocutor
✅ Certain that PGM should be allowed
badfacts.substack.com/p/the-psycholo…
3.
Guyatt analogizes gender med to "early HIV care."

But doctors have been treating "gender" for 60+ years.

HIV researchers have figured out prevention, detection, and treatments proven to save lives.

"Gender" researchers have not 🤨
Read 6 tweets
Sep 5
🚨 Seattle Public Schools defies US Supreme Court

Parents have a constitutional right to opt their young children out of "LGBTQ" lessons for religious reasons. SCOTUS declared this in June in Mahmoud v. Taylor.

SPS has not updated its policy 🧵 Image
2.
SPS mandates LGBTQ lessons "for the purpose of increasing kindness."

Mahmoud rejects this idea. The lessons inevitably teach kids what to think about sex and "gender identity."

The dissent screamed "kindness," the majority smacked it down.
seattleschools.org/departments/he…Image
3.
Seattle Public Schools cites many authorities for its position.

They're all subordinate to the US Supreme Court, which holds the opposite. Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 4
🚨ACLU shenanigans

SCOTUS is set to hear 2 girls' sports cases this term: Hecox (Idaho) and BPJ (WV).

BPJ is a boy on blockers. Hecox is a college man who went through puberty. ACLU reps both.

ACLU wants SCOTUS only thinking about puberty-blocked boys. So... 🧵
2.
ACLU got Hecox to drop his lawsuit. Now it's arguing his case is moot so SCOTUS shouldn't hear it.

Details from Idaho's counsel:
3.
ACLU lawyers don't want trans rights to be based on whether someone has had medical interventions. Just "identity."

But in sports cases like BPJ they argue it matters when boys are puberty-blocked. It's just easier to win that way. They can build on the precedent later.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(