In 1541, conquistador Francisco de Orellana and his men became stranded along the Amazon River.
Their only option was to build a boat and follow the length of the river. They were the first Europeans to do so — and the only ones to encounter thriving Amazonian civilization.
1/
After splitting off from Gonzalo Pizarro's expedition to the fabled "Land of Cinnamon," Orellana and 50 men traveled downriver to look for supplies. They quickly realized that they could not fight the current to return.
Without a shipbuilder among them, they would have to build a brigantine and navigate the river.
They had no idea what lay downstream, or even how long the river was — at this point, the Amazon was totally unexplored, a true heart of darkness.
The journey took nine months. The fact that they survived is insane: most of the time was spent fighting starvation, and the rest of it in brutal combat with natives.
For that alone, it's a compelling story. But the most interesting part is what they encountered along the way,
The only direct account of the expedition was undertaken by Gaspar de Carvajal, a friar who recorded each turn in the river.
His ethnographic notes painted a picture of a peopled, developed Amazonia. Riverside tribes farmed turtles and produced luxury goods for inland empires.
Twice did the expedition have direct contact with these inland empires: once in the form of messengers — described as tall, fair-skinned men — inviting them to their capital.
The latter was with *the* Amazons: actual warrior women (once again, tall and fair-skinned).
According to Carvajal, these women served as officers and commanded canoes of local warriors. They killed men who retreated with their clubs.
He also describes local war-shamans, including a somewhat-funny anecdote of an arquebusier shooting one and halting an entire battle.
Until recently, Carvajal's account was written off as fantasy — even the more minor ethnographic observations, like the production of pottery or the raising of turtles for food.
Academic consensus said that the Amazon was simply not populated, so his account was impossible.
However, three recent studies in Nature and Science have proven otherwise.
The Amazon River was once a central artery for multiple civilizations. There were "highways" in the jungle, and the jungle soil was cultivated for human use.
Carvajal was telling the truth.
Unfortunately, the Orellana expedition probably led to this region's downfall from disease.
In their desperate fight for survival, they likely transmitted Old World diseases, which led to a rapid depopulation — so rapid that by 1560, Lope de Aguirre found the land devastated.
However, the vindication of Carvajal has opened up a new frontier in pre-Columbian archaeology.
Despite this new frontier, the original text has remained obscure and out of print.
My republication (via Dissident Review) brings it back into circulation.
Gaspar de Carvajal presents an incredible story of survival and exploration, as well as a tantalizing look at a civilization that — until *last year* — had been considered nonexistent.
It should not be relegated to obscurity. Rather, it should serve as the basis for new studies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The “work” debate is mostly people talking past each other, but it’s very clear that old-type “bootstrap” discourse is just done. Sandblasted into nothing each time it encounters reality. The “deal” for young people only gets worse with each passing day.
Doesn’t mean you should just become a NEET, obviously. But I don’t think most of the people arguing on that side are NEETs, or want to be NEETs. It’s just the premise.
The solution for young people is to exploit any advantage they personally have; to seek marginal living/employment situations that break the “rules” in their favor.
Also high-powered careers — “normal life” is broken, so you have to aspire to something else while it’s repaired.
The passive nature of so many young people is the result of a lifetime of this. Every event has been used as a way to further harangue and limit them. Responding to ie violence is out of the question. If you do, the typically helpless authorities suddenly have infinite power.
Kids aren’t dumb — they know who is protected vs who isn’t. It becomes obvious as early as grade school that some groups have free rein and others do not; the incentive/punishment system exists for normal whites and not for others.
Tyler has a Permanent Record. Tyrone does not.
The school system is an earlier and more radical extension of the legal-cultural system by which anarcho-tyranny is implemented, and tells especially young men of ability and spirit that they must Sit And Take It, no matter what It is.
US public schools consistently underpunish nonwhite students and overpunish white students. It’s where people learn the rules of anarcho-tyranny, and has been far longer than this has been the legal status quo.
This isn’t spread via policy or law. Disparate impact suits are usually brought up in this discussion, but all they did was codify the existing state of affairs.
It happens because “educators” — most people, really — are totally mindcaptured by media.
The results: white kids learn that everything they do will be scrutinized to the highest degree. Even outside of school, they are always Watched in some meaningful way. The Permanent Record exists for them and no one else. Racial violence, for example, can only ever go one way.
The main point of this post is pertinent and good — and of course it’s insane that we have to live like this — but I am begging people to drop the “bullying” frame, really the entire word.
What’s happening is not 80s movie shenanigans, it’s racial gang violence.
In the US, the equivalent is white parents talking about “bullying” from black students, which is really not the case. The cultural image of “bullying” is exclusion, mean names, minor/funny harassment. What’s happening is often attempted murder.
By complaining of “bullying” you’re saying that your child is archetypally the weak outsider, mocked by the “popular.” I don’t think this ever reflected reality (some have pointed out that they’re Semitic mythological tropes inserted via Hollywood) — and it certainly doesn’t now.
How people “learned” to fight is a contentious question. In many cases, it’s very tied into ethnic pride. Here’s a rough sketch of my hypothesis.
In short, I think the better question is when people *forgot* how to fight.
1/
There are many competing claims to being the “originator” of martial arts.
We’re going to define the term as systematized methods of fighting, whether unarmed or with weapons, but particularly hand-to-hand — i.e. archery or atlatl throwing is not a “martial art.”
Martial arts are also a distinctly… well, martial endeavor. They are undertaken exclusively among men, for the purpose of more effectively killing a resisting opponent in battle or single combat.
This includes combat with weapons, open-hand striking, and of course grappling.
This is ripped from David Foster Wallace’s “This is Water.” I know this because a middle school teacher made us watch it on repeat and do (many) assignments on it. Even as a kid, I found it juvenile and stupid. 150 years ago, students at that age would have been reading Latin.
When people brag about their “success” in K-12, it betrays a lack of depth. Basically, that they were good at repeating these kinds of platitudes, and getting pats on the head about it felt like a great achievement.
American public education isn’t really “hard,” in that the material is high-level and fast. A lot of it is embarrassingly flat — mediocre teachers doing Dead Poets Society or Stand and Deliver LARP. Anyone smart realizes this young.