In 1541, conquistador Francisco de Orellana and his men became stranded along the Amazon River.
Their only option was to build a boat and follow the length of the river. They were the first Europeans to do so — and the only ones to encounter thriving Amazonian civilization.
1/
After splitting off from Gonzalo Pizarro's expedition to the fabled "Land of Cinnamon," Orellana and 50 men traveled downriver to look for supplies. They quickly realized that they could not fight the current to return.
Without a shipbuilder among them, they would have to build a brigantine and navigate the river.
They had no idea what lay downstream, or even how long the river was — at this point, the Amazon was totally unexplored, a true heart of darkness.
The journey took nine months. The fact that they survived is insane: most of the time was spent fighting starvation, and the rest of it in brutal combat with natives.
For that alone, it's a compelling story. But the most interesting part is what they encountered along the way,
The only direct account of the expedition was undertaken by Gaspar de Carvajal, a friar who recorded each turn in the river.
His ethnographic notes painted a picture of a peopled, developed Amazonia. Riverside tribes farmed turtles and produced luxury goods for inland empires.
Twice did the expedition have direct contact with these inland empires: once in the form of messengers — described as tall, fair-skinned men — inviting them to their capital.
The latter was with *the* Amazons: actual warrior women (once again, tall and fair-skinned).
According to Carvajal, these women served as officers and commanded canoes of local warriors. They killed men who retreated with their clubs.
He also describes local war-shamans, including a somewhat-funny anecdote of an arquebusier shooting one and halting an entire battle.
Until recently, Carvajal's account was written off as fantasy — even the more minor ethnographic observations, like the production of pottery or the raising of turtles for food.
Academic consensus said that the Amazon was simply not populated, so his account was impossible.
However, three recent studies in Nature and Science have proven otherwise.
The Amazon River was once a central artery for multiple civilizations. There were "highways" in the jungle, and the jungle soil was cultivated for human use.
Carvajal was telling the truth.
Unfortunately, the Orellana expedition probably led to this region's downfall from disease.
In their desperate fight for survival, they likely transmitted Old World diseases, which led to a rapid depopulation — so rapid that by 1560, Lope de Aguirre found the land devastated.
However, the vindication of Carvajal has opened up a new frontier in pre-Columbian archaeology.
Despite this new frontier, the original text has remained obscure and out of print.
My republication (via Dissident Review) brings it back into circulation.
Gaspar de Carvajal presents an incredible story of survival and exploration, as well as a tantalizing look at a civilization that — until *last year* — had been considered nonexistent.
It should not be relegated to obscurity. Rather, it should serve as the basis for new studies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Right now there’s a change following what’s described in the thread: the two-high safety scheme is suffocating the deep pass, and again changing the game to favor the run, screen passes, etc.
There’s a popular nostalgia for power-T offenses and other old-school schemes.
As a result, the fullback and the very physical defender are returning as stars. The game people want to see is older and frankly more violent.
Well, that’s the game that the loosest, most apolitical part of “red tribe” wants to see.
The immediate belief that “giants couldn’t have been real” is really funny to me. It’s not a fire-breathing lizard, it’s literally just a really tall guy.
The same thing goes for older skepticism about the Giant Squid. We already have squids. We’re very aware of them. But apparently everyone agreed on a Hard Line at a certain size.
So much of this “skepticism” has only come about in the past 120 years, and if you go back to its origin it’s redditor-tier “erm, I’m too smart to believe in chud fairytales.” There’s no substantiation to the arguments. It’s just smarmy denial to bother people they don’t like.
Something that’s bothered me for a long time in how we talk about communist agitators is that we pretend they’re young and dumb and senseless instead of rightly identifying them as communist agitators
Take them at their word. They want you dead and say as much in public.
Weak, dysgenic 19 year olds with gay voice make up a large chunk of antifa types. Pretending that this stuff is just “haha dumb young people, amirite?” is how we got here in the first place.
“Lol those silly campus activists”
They’re communists. They’re not “misguided young people,” they are activist partisans for an ideology based around hurting you. They’re the footsoldiers of all the stuff oriented around harming you.
(I know this was not OP’s point, but this is more of a response to what he’s quoting, which alleges that “American art has only been good because leftism”)
But if I had to name The American Painter (in the same sense that Melville is The American Novelist) I’d say NC Wyeth. His style has been so endlessly copied and parodied — poorly — that he gets lumped in with some of his followers.
Joe Rogan is right about dragons. Many strange animals have come and gone in human memory; for a banal example, man hunted European lions into extinction. See also giants and strange pygmies, the latter of whom were wiped out in a bloody war with migratory cranes. It's all real.
Patagonia was once home to giant men. There are so many accounts — Pigafetta, Drake, Schouten & Le Maire, Byron, and more — that the null hypothesis *must* be "giants existed." To deny this is to allege a centuries-long conspiracy undertaken for no discernible reason.
So many instances of "x wasn't real" boil down to historians saying "I don't believe it, therefore it's fake."
For a verified example, see the Giant Squid; scientists speculated that it never existed, then that it's extinct, and then... each time after being proven wrong.