Glenna Goldis Profile picture
Dec 5, 2024 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I'm reading the Skrmetti transcript.

This 🧵is Chase Strangio from the ACLU arguing against Tennessee's ban on child gender med.
Strangio says gender med is the ONLY treatment that helped her clients. What other treatments were tried? Appears none.

Since 1960s, gender doctors have insisted that if someone wants to be the opposite sex, only gender med can help them. They refuse to develop alternatives. Image
Alito presses Strangio on suicide research, just as he did with Prelogar.

Alito is right to zero in on this deception. There's no research showing gender med reduces suicide, one study showing it doesn't, one showing the suicide rate of treated patients is 19x general population Image
Alito cites the Cass Review.

Strangio's response: gender med reduces suicidality, not suicide. Significant difference there! You might call it life or death. Image
Alito keeps asking if trans status is immutable. Finally Strangio says discordance between gender identity and sex has a biological basis.

Note she doesn't say GI itself has a bio basis (it doesn't). Discordance is their code word for gay, which does have a bio basis. Image
Some have gagged at Alito referencing gender fluidity. But he's (probably) not saying he believes in gender fluidity. He's exploring Strangio's belief in gender fluidity and how it screws up her argument. Image
Prelogar and Strangio use the term "birth sex" rather than "sex assigned at birth." To sound less insane I suppose. It plays the same function in their verbal trickery -- both terms just mean sex, but they don't want to acknowledge sex.
Alito makes another good point about transgender being a big vague "umbrella term" according to shrinks.

All this just goes to one of the arguments, the one nobody expects to prevail. But does it also indicate Alito is very close to peaking?
I think Kavanaugh is expressing how he genuinely feels about the case. Trans kids are real, detrans is a real problem, it's hard! Image
In the middle of rambling along Kavanaugh just accidentally hits it BAM on the head. Image
Wow. Jackson returns to her interracial marriage analogy, this time with an entirely different theory about why it works.

She doesn't believe this blather. She's just trying to stigmatize Tenn's position by comparing it to one of the dumbest, most offensive laws ever. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenna Goldis

Glenna Goldis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @glennagoldis

Jan 23
🧵
Trump's 2-sexes order savages "gender identity."

Here's why that matters to the future of "trans rights" litigtion.
2/
The ACLU is the legal genius behind trans. In its lawsuits, it defines gender identity as one's sense of one's gender, with M and F as examples.

ACLU does not define gender. Judges assume it means sex, but it could mean anything. Image
3/
ACLU makes it sound like gender identity is based in biology, like sexual orientation. It is not.

These quotes are from its complaint in US v. Skrmetti.
badfacts.substack.com/p/the-aclus-bi…Image
Read 15 tweets
Jan 22
🚨Long Island judge upholds law that protects women's and girls' sports

The matter concerns a man named Bratzilla who wants to play roller derby against women.
🧵 Image
2/
Last year Nassau County (Long Island, NY) passed a law requiring sports teams using public facilities to identify as mixed-sex or male if the team includes a male player.

A "women's" roller derby team, the Roller Rebels, objected because one of its players is a trans-ID man.
3/
The man goes by Bratzilla because he is very tall and likes bratz dolls.

Roller derby is a dangerous contact sport. Its players pride themselves in being "punk." The NY women's league welcomes men who ID as women.

I wrote about this case in November.
badfacts.substack.com/p/hooters-brat…
Read 12 tweets
Jan 21
🧵
I'm reading Trump's executive order (EO) on gender ideology.

It's brilliant, legally and rhetorically.

The intro doesn't mince words. Image
2/
Feelings will be hurt. Image
3/
Over and over, this order refuses to pick a favorite between women's rights and truth.

Both important, both under attack by gender ideologues. Image
Read 13 tweets
Jan 20
Why does President Trump need to declare there are two sexes?

In 2017, the Endocrine Society claimed the term biological sex was "imprecise and and should be avoided."

Really it was just 10 doctors who said this, but they controlled a key ES committee. /1 Image
The ACLU soon began quoting this ES Guideline in its trans lawsuits to "destabilize" the judges' understanding of sex -- sex being the word that unlocks rights in law.

The idea was to let people identify their own sex by declaring a "gender identity."


/2badfacts.substack.com/p/chase-strang…
The ACLU executed this maneuver (not quite an argument) when it represented:

A) Girls who wanted to use the boys' bathroom
B) Boys who wanted to compete in girls' sports
C) Doctors who wanted to block the puberty of gender-nonconforming children
/3
Read 6 tweets
Jan 19
🚨Corruption

NYT published a story today about GOP state bills "targeted at the LGBTQ population."

@nytimes says GOP opposes "deference to gender nonconformity." Doesn't mention detransitioners or boys winning girls' trophies.

The piece comes with ads for the ACLU.
🧵 Image
2/
So the ACLU pays NYT, NYT publishes a news article that adopts ACLU's framing, and readers can click from the article to the ACLU join page.

Here's the backstory.

Pitching to media buyers, NYT promises "intentional ad products."
advertising.nytimes.comImage
3/
"Influential audience" could mean judges, attorneys general, and lawmakers.

NYT really is an influential outlet. Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 15
Two law professors are trying to scare doctors.

They argue in JAMA (med journal) that if the Supreme Court sides with Tennessee in US v. Skrmetti , medical practice having nothing to do with gender med "may be in peril."
🧵
2/
The piece by Boston U Profs. Nicole Huberfeld and Michael Ulrich is titled "US v. Skrmetti -- Testing the Transition to Politicized Medicine"

It's a slippery slope argument that letting states ban gender med will lead them to ban real med. Image
3/
The law profs assume that:
1. Gender med prevents suicide
2. Transgender people are a class (no definition provided)
3. Bans on gender med treat this class different from everyone else
4. These bans are supported by "false of no evidence" (later paragraph) Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(