Glenna Goldis Profile picture
Dec 5, 2024 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I'm reading the Skrmetti transcript.

This 🧵is Chase Strangio from the ACLU arguing against Tennessee's ban on child gender med.
Strangio says gender med is the ONLY treatment that helped her clients. What other treatments were tried? Appears none.

Since 1960s, gender doctors have insisted that if someone wants to be the opposite sex, only gender med can help them. They refuse to develop alternatives. Image
Alito presses Strangio on suicide research, just as he did with Prelogar.

Alito is right to zero in on this deception. There's no research showing gender med reduces suicide, one study showing it doesn't, one showing the suicide rate of treated patients is 19x general population Image
Alito cites the Cass Review.

Strangio's response: gender med reduces suicidality, not suicide. Significant difference there! You might call it life or death. Image
Alito keeps asking if trans status is immutable. Finally Strangio says discordance between gender identity and sex has a biological basis.

Note she doesn't say GI itself has a bio basis (it doesn't). Discordance is their code word for gay, which does have a bio basis. Image
Some have gagged at Alito referencing gender fluidity. But he's (probably) not saying he believes in gender fluidity. He's exploring Strangio's belief in gender fluidity and how it screws up her argument. Image
Prelogar and Strangio use the term "birth sex" rather than "sex assigned at birth." To sound less insane I suppose. It plays the same function in their verbal trickery -- both terms just mean sex, but they don't want to acknowledge sex.
Alito makes another good point about transgender being a big vague "umbrella term" according to shrinks.

All this just goes to one of the arguments, the one nobody expects to prevail. But does it also indicate Alito is very close to peaking?
I think Kavanaugh is expressing how he genuinely feels about the case. Trans kids are real, detrans is a real problem, it's hard! Image
In the middle of rambling along Kavanaugh just accidentally hits it BAM on the head. Image
Wow. Jackson returns to her interracial marriage analogy, this time with an entirely different theory about why it works.

She doesn't believe this blather. She's just trying to stigmatize Tenn's position by comparing it to one of the dumbest, most offensive laws ever. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenna Goldis

Glenna Goldis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @glennagoldis

Jul 2
NYT published an essay by a journalist about how essential the youth suicide hotline is. He knows because he worked it himself.

Uh ... does this guy have credentials?🤦

He has no idea what distressed kids need. He just reports what they told him they want. (1/3) Image
My Dad was a crisis intervention counselor with an MSW and clinical license (now retired). It never ceases to amaze me how different the Trevor Project sounds from him. "Just give suicidal teens what they demand," he said never.
(2/3)
nytimes.com/2025/07/02/opi…
This guy could only listen and validate ... because he has no professional training.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say this hotline of inept do-gooders and journalists researching a story is NOT essential. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 28
I'm quoted today in the NYT as the counterpoint to a bunch of gay doofuses and shills. 🧵 Image
2.
This guy thinks wanting to do something is just like wanting to be something.

We're listening to his opinion because he got married🥰 Image
3.
Gender medicine damages the body 🤕
T is anabolic steroids💉

You realize this if you listen to the arguments against it.

These legendary married people have not listened. Image
Read 11 tweets
Jun 23
On second read, the NYT story on the trans legal movement makes the moderates look worse than the radicals.

My notes on that and more...🧵
@nickconfessore
2.
NYT implies trans advocates should have avoided debates over sex or made up a palatable theory.

But how can you argue trans people are not the sex they seem to be, without making up a novel theory of sex? And why should voters accept a made-up theory of sex? Image
3.
Why is a sex discrimination law prof opining about medical ethics? To avoid talking about the repercussions of trans ideology for her field (it's dark).

She requested anonymity "for fear of blowback from students and colleagues."

Her job is to argue with them! Image
Read 25 tweets
Jun 19
Trans activists are scapegoating Chase Strangio for their loss in Skrmetti, to convince Americans that their movement is fundamentally sound.

No. The perfidy predates Strangio and is intrinsic to the argument that we should pretend some people are the opposite sex.

Links⏬
2.
Today, NYT eagerly transcribes the anti-Strangio argument of trans activists and anonymous ACLU attorneys while minimizing the bodily injury caused by gender med
nytimes.com/2025/06/19/mag…
3.
I placed Strangio within the rich intellectual tradition of trans philosophers.

She's just another vain lesbian being used by fetishistic men.
badfacts.substack.com/p/chase-strang…
Read 7 tweets
Jun 6
🧵
THE PROTOCOL - Episode 4

NYT covers Jamie Reed's explosive affidavit, but only the driest parts. Not the desiccated vaginas ripping open, e.g.

NYT asks Jamie whiny questions. "There are so many people who are going to feel so hurt" by Jamie's testimony against gender med.
2.
Jamie responds to NYT brilliantly. But because all the horrifying details of medical harm are stripped out, it sounds like she's engaging in a fuzzy abstract debate about how to evaluate a treatment's efficacy.
3.
Jamie shares the trauma of working in a gender clinic where doctors ignored her safety concerns and she worried she was hurting kids.

NYT says her experience mirrors that of trans kids who can't be themselves.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 6
🧵
THE PROTOCOL - Episode 3

NYT sets up Laura-Edwards Leeper as a hero of careful assessment, and Johanna-Olson Kennedy as the villain who opposes assessment.

JOK is a villain but not because of her stance on assessments. Those are, in fact, bogus. Here we go...
2.
LEL spent a week in the Netherlands learning.

She was a young shrink hired by Norman Spack, who'd started transing "street kids" in the 70s and "salivated" at the thought of blocking puberty to help boys pass. (NYT doesn't report this.)
badfacts.substack.com/p/how-endocrin…
3.
LEL felt nervous assessing kids on her own. She made them get therapists because it "felt good" to have a colleague involved. But these therapists were nervous and baffled themselves - she had to teach them about gender.

Luckily these early cases were "straightforward."
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(