Glenna Goldis Profile picture
Dec 5 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I'm reading the Skrmetti transcript.

This 🧵is Chase Strangio from the ACLU arguing against Tennessee's ban on child gender med.
Strangio says gender med is the ONLY treatment that helped her clients. What other treatments were tried? Appears none.

Since 1960s, gender doctors have insisted that if someone wants to be the opposite sex, only gender med can help them. They refuse to develop alternatives. Image
Alito presses Strangio on suicide research, just as he did with Prelogar.

Alito is right to zero in on this deception. There's no research showing gender med reduces suicide, one study showing it doesn't, one showing the suicide rate of treated patients is 19x general population Image
Alito cites the Cass Review.

Strangio's response: gender med reduces suicidality, not suicide. Significant difference there! You might call it life or death. Image
Alito keeps asking if trans status is immutable. Finally Strangio says discordance between gender identity and sex has a biological basis.

Note she doesn't say GI itself has a bio basis (it doesn't). Discordance is their code word for gay, which does have a bio basis. Image
Some have gagged at Alito referencing gender fluidity. But he's (probably) not saying he believes in gender fluidity. He's exploring Strangio's belief in gender fluidity and how it screws up her argument. Image
Prelogar and Strangio use the term "birth sex" rather than "sex assigned at birth." To sound less insane I suppose. It plays the same function in their verbal trickery -- both terms just mean sex, but they don't want to acknowledge sex.
Alito makes another good point about transgender being a big vague "umbrella term" according to shrinks.

All this just goes to one of the arguments, the one nobody expects to prevail. But does it also indicate Alito is very close to peaking?
I think Kavanaugh is expressing how he genuinely feels about the case. Trans kids are real, detrans is a real problem, it's hard! Image
In the middle of rambling along Kavanaugh just accidentally hits it BAM on the head. Image
Wow. Jackson returns to her interracial marriage analogy, this time with an entirely different theory about why it works.

She doesn't believe this blather. She's just trying to stigmatize Tenn's position by comparing it to one of the dumbest, most offensive laws ever. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenna Goldis

Glenna Goldis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @unyieldingbicyc

Dec 21
This time last year I was open to arguments by "moderate" trans activists.

Then I started researching history.

Mythbusting 🧵
Moderate myth #1:
Trans social contagion is a new phenomenon that only girls are susceptible to.

Truth:
Social contagion has always been a major cause of trans identity, including among boys.
badfacts.substack.com/p/the-trans-te…
Moderate myth #2:
Child gender therapy used to be a legit practice. Ken Zucker helped kids desist.

Truth:
Gender identity disorder was just a label applied to GNC kids. Zucker transed gay teens and never had a scientific methodology.
badfacts.substack.com/p/right-before…
Read 15 tweets
Dec 6
Many people are shocked by the smug, foolish behavior of Justices Sotomayor and Jackson at Skrmetti oral argument.

I'm not shocked. They remind me of several other federal judges who have ruled in favor of "trans rights." These people are very confident they are heroes.
🧵
Judge Jay Moody struck down Arkansas's ban on pediatric gender medicine
lisaselindavis.substack.com/p/brandt-files…
Judge Robert Hinkle struck down Florida's ban on pediatric gender medicine
badfacts.substack.com/p/unrestrained…
Read 5 tweets
Dec 5
@NYT posted its story on today's Skrmetti rally.

The scene they paint is unfamiliar to me. Were we even on the same plaza? Yes, we were. One of the reporters @minhokimdh interviewed me.
🧵
2/
This makes it sound like the Tennessee side was playing Antifa. Not so! First, there's nothing remarkable about people wearing black winter coats on a freezing day.

Second, there were non-black coats on our side, not to mention our funky signs. Image
3/
As usual, NYT accepts the premise that some youth are "transgender" even though I told Kim that was disputed. Image
Read 11 tweets
Dec 4
You can livestream the Skrmetti argument at the Supreme Court website starting at 10am eastern.

Does Tennessee's ban on child gender med discriminate by sex or trans status?

Some thoughts about what we might hear 🧵
1. Definitions of transgender, sex, gender, male, female. If the justices press for these, it means they’re figuring out the grift.
2. Keep in mind: A justice asking a Q doesn’t mean “I’m concerned about this point.” Could be devil’s advocate. Stress testing. Wanting to hear the best response so they can use it in their opinion.
Read 10 tweets
Nov 28
Boy wore a shirt to school that said "there are only two genders." School censored him. He sued (free speech). Ended up at federal 1st Circuit.

Lawyer for school: This message that there is just two genders is vile, and it says to someone who is nonbinary, You do not exist.
/1
/2
Judge David Barron asked the school's lawyer, What if the shirt said "male is not a gender"?

School lawyer: The administrators would have to think, well, is that attacking a core identity? Probably not. Male is not a gender.
/3
Boy's lawyer argued the school was not inclusive to him when it called his views hateful. Judge Barron again:

"No one was saying HIS gender didn't exist!"
Read 5 tweets
Nov 24
🧵
In the 1970s doctors required male transsexuals to sign on for castration at the outset of transitioning because they were worried about the combination of male-level T and female-level E causing cancer.
2/
It's referenced in this 1976 court case, for example.
scholar.google.com/scholar_case?c…
3/
The early standards of care (1979- 98) did not reference cancer risk.

In the 90s, MTF activists demanded that gender doctors "feminize" them even if they did not seek castration. digitaltransgenderarchive.net/files/pk02c974p
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(