This 🧵is Chase Strangio from the ACLU arguing against Tennessee's ban on child gender med.
Strangio says gender med is the ONLY treatment that helped her clients. What other treatments were tried? Appears none.
Since 1960s, gender doctors have insisted that if someone wants to be the opposite sex, only gender med can help them. They refuse to develop alternatives.
Alito presses Strangio on suicide research, just as he did with Prelogar.
Alito is right to zero in on this deception. There's no research showing gender med reduces suicide, one study showing it doesn't, one showing the suicide rate of treated patients is 19x general population
Alito cites the Cass Review.
Strangio's response: gender med reduces suicidality, not suicide. Significant difference there! You might call it life or death.
Alito keeps asking if trans status is immutable. Finally Strangio says discordance between gender identity and sex has a biological basis.
Note she doesn't say GI itself has a bio basis (it doesn't). Discordance is their code word for gay, which does have a bio basis.
Some have gagged at Alito referencing gender fluidity. But he's (probably) not saying he believes in gender fluidity. He's exploring Strangio's belief in gender fluidity and how it screws up her argument.
Prelogar and Strangio use the term "birth sex" rather than "sex assigned at birth." To sound less insane I suppose. It plays the same function in their verbal trickery -- both terms just mean sex, but they don't want to acknowledge sex.
Alito makes another good point about transgender being a big vague "umbrella term" according to shrinks.
All this just goes to one of the arguments, the one nobody expects to prevail. But does it also indicate Alito is very close to peaking?
I think Kavanaugh is expressing how he genuinely feels about the case. Trans kids are real, detrans is a real problem, it's hard!
In the middle of rambling along Kavanaugh just accidentally hits it BAM on the head.
Wow. Jackson returns to her interracial marriage analogy, this time with an entirely different theory about why it works.
She doesn't believe this blather. She's just trying to stigmatize Tenn's position by comparing it to one of the dumbest, most offensive laws ever.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨Long Island judge upholds law that protects women's and girls' sports
The matter concerns a man named Bratzilla who wants to play roller derby against women.
🧵
2/ Last year Nassau County (Long Island, NY) passed a law requiring sports teams using public facilities to identify as mixed-sex or male if the team includes a male player.
A "women's" roller derby team, the Roller Rebels, objected because one of its players is a trans-ID man.
3/ The man goes by Bratzilla because he is very tall and likes bratz dolls.
Roller derby is a dangerous contact sport. Its players pride themselves in being "punk." The NY women's league welcomes men who ID as women.
Why does President Trump need to declare there are two sexes?
In 2017, the Endocrine Society claimed the term biological sex was "imprecise and and should be avoided."
Really it was just 10 doctors who said this, but they controlled a key ES committee. /1
The ACLU soon began quoting this ES Guideline in its trans lawsuits to "destabilize" the judges' understanding of sex -- sex being the word that unlocks rights in law.
The idea was to let people identify their own sex by declaring a "gender identity."
The ACLU executed this maneuver (not quite an argument) when it represented:
A) Girls who wanted to use the boys' bathroom
B) Boys who wanted to compete in girls' sports
C) Doctors who wanted to block the puberty of gender-nonconforming children
/3
They argue in JAMA (med journal) that if the Supreme Court sides with Tennessee in US v. Skrmetti , medical practice having nothing to do with gender med "may be in peril."
🧵
2/ The piece by Boston U Profs. Nicole Huberfeld and Michael Ulrich is titled "US v. Skrmetti -- Testing the Transition to Politicized Medicine"
It's a slippery slope argument that letting states ban gender med will lead them to ban real med.
3/ The law profs assume that: 1. Gender med prevents suicide 2. Transgender people are a class (no definition provided) 3. Bans on gender med treat this class different from everyone else 4. These bans are supported by "false of no evidence" (later paragraph)