If you are thinking, that's just salt, not viruses, not to worry. Scientists have tested N95s using real viruses using an international standard test called Viral Filtration Efficency (VFE). N95s filter viruses extremely well.
N95s can filter extremely small particles thanks to multiple mechanisms, including electrostatic attraction.
This video does a great job of how N95 filter media works to filter a wide range of particles.
Whether you think you need N95s or not, now is a good time to stock up on them. You want them on hand *before* there is a rush to buy them, like in wild fire season or another pandemic. They can last for years in storage and still perform well.
You'll get the best protection from masks that seal well to your face to keep unfiltered air out of the mask. You may have to try a few different models to find one that fits you well.
@zhouliang_mask "on the *fibers* of a KN95"
Well, I guess the typos show my post isn't AI 😅
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Can you make a cheap Amazon Plague Mask into an effective tight fitting PAPR mask?
Yes, yes you can. If you happen to already have a bunch of stuff everyone totally has lying around their home:
I've also done a 4 exercise OSHA fit test in this hacked Plague PAPR mask and passed - well, I got a great fit factor but the hacked mask isn't OSHA compliant, nor is fit testing a PAPR with the blower on, so some might say it didn't pass. 🤔
I may put together a longer video in horizontal format, the one I originally shot, but I'm trying to make my videos less boring and am giving YouTube shorts a try. 😅
More from @NIOSH's Respiratory Protection Week presentation by Susan M. Moore, NPPTL Associate Director for Science:
Respirator fit solutions for people with beards.
The Singh Thattha technique can help, but it is not yet OSHA approved. NIOSH is studying this method.
Currently OSHA fit test regulations require smooth skin at the respirator seal, as shown in this graphic.
But some people have beards for cultural, religious and even health reasons that are incompatible with those regulations. Solutions are needed for equitable safety.
Facial hair has a demonstrable effect on respirator seal and protection, and some masks work better with facial hair than others even without special methods to improve the seal, but it isn't really about whether they are KN95 or N95 or KF94, but individual mask models and design
Thoughts about @NIOSH's Respiratory Protection Week presentation by Susan M. Moore, NPPTL Associate Director for Science:
The presentation showed current and future source control respirators, including a NIOSH exemplar model source control elastomeric mask for HCWs.
I was glad to see elastomeric source control respirators highlighted. Dr. Moore referenced industry creating source control elastomerics for the pandemic. But the 3M mask with the exhalation filter shown is a bit of a mixed bag.
3M created an exhalation filter that fits on a single model of 3M mask, the 6000 series half mask respirator, a good but lower end model with no speech diaphragm. The filter was a good emergency stopgap, but not a good long term solution.
ReadiMask is still selling old stock stick on N95mmasks from ~4 years ago, made before NIOSH approval with no warning about whether the adhesive may have degraded over time.
How old is the other mask stock they are selling? And has the adhesive degraded?
The Readimasks I have don't seem to be adhering as well as when I bought them. I managed to supplement the adhesive with Mastisol liquid adhesive supplied by @findmeabluebird, but I'd like Readimask to be more transparent about the age of their stock.
Is there a way we can monitor how well the adhesive is holding up over time? Can we objectively measure how the adhesion? This standardized method looks good but seems very expensive. And I'm not sure if stainless steel is analogous to skin.
Are valved masks cooler? I tested 3 different 3M N95s to try to learn more about the effect of valves on heat in respirators.
Not much mathematical difference on average, under these specific conditions, with these 3 masks:
V-Flex +7.3°C
Valved Aura +7.3°C
No Valve Aura +7.5°C
I expect that results could vary dramatically under different conditions, including temperature, humidity, airflow rate, mask model and more. Even so, I was surprised that the valve didn't make a more substantial difference in average in-mask temperature.
I also tested valved and unvalved Auras during 15 minute outdoor walks in mixed shade and sun and got a similar lack of difference in average in mask temperatures (using different testing gear with 10 second intervals between samples).
Testing the AIRfanta Lite4 - the full length video.
I used several kinds of testing machines to characterize the amount and location of protection this portable laminar flow air purifier @Engineer_Wong sent me for review.
The video has a PortaCount test as well as the AeroTrak test - they measure different sized particles. I used a different particle range in the AeroTrak graph in the video than the one I posted on Twitter earlier, but they both illustrate the on vs. off axis protection levels.
I've added an introduction talking about the context of layers of mitigation, to help better evaluate whether this could help you or not - spoiler, it's upside if you use it for an unavoidable situation where you can't wear a mask, such as a dental visit...