1/ The mRNA platform must not be a consideration for humans animals or plants! The Lipid Nanoparticles alone are a deal breaker, period! 🧵 
2/ Risk/benefit analysis is key in all medical intervention decisions.
3/ Don’t fall for “safe and effective” without full analysis.
4/ Such decisions require informed consent and transparency. This, from the @CDCgov is medical disinformation (yes I’m using their own terms).
5/ They ended the biodistribution studies before Cmax was reached. Nothing peaked yet before study was ended.
6/ They knew back in 2014 that the accumulation increases and continues far beyond their study duration.
7/ The very same LNPs in the liver within 15m.
8/ More definitive evidence that the CDC was not honest in their representation of the LBP gene therapy.
9/ the LNP/modmRNA transfer through breast milk, yet as late as 2023 “experts” recommend it during pregnancy!
10/ They knew this going back to 2010.
11/ The LNP carriers can reach the trophoblasts on their own and induce apoptosis.
12/ Just the LNPs alone wreak havoc on the reproductive drive system. Morexreas ns why this platform in healthies is a hard pass!
13/ they knew it wouldn’t stay at the injection site, and even called it a #bodyhack and described it as a “feature”.
14/ we know these particles core are the ones used in Pfizer.
15/ where are the tox studies, and teratogenicity, carcinogenicity, genotox studies?
16/ Not for human use, until an #EUA allows more lax regulations to experiment on the once-healthy masses.
17/ and they got away with ignoring their x studies because they classified LNPs as excupients. I even argued with Paul Offit about this distinction, but he is clueless about CMC, and pushed a false narrative.
18/ They cause universal inflammation. So many implications of harm.
19/ Multiple pathway triggers anyone?
20/ LNPs alone triggering foam cells? What implications do they have on platelet, or blood cell formation?
21/ the carrier alone modulates clot formation. What could go wrong with this platform?
22/ This platform alters both innate and adaptive immunity! IgG4 makes recipient more prone to constant infection.
23/ Don’t get me started on zeta potential!
24/ When others know it’s dangerous and discontinued development, maybe it should be an indication it may be harmful?
25/25
Was this a good idea to roll out to the world’s population for an infection that they couldn’t even find enough mortality to properly study necessity of such an intervention? I fear an entire generation plus will feel the consequences of such an irresponsible measure.
Was this a good idea to roll out to the world’s population for an infection that they couldn’t even find enough mortality to properly study necessity of such an intervention? I fear an entire generation plus will feel the consequences of such an irresponsible measure.
Weird autocorrect (excipients)
Tox studies. (Autocorrect hates science almost as much as our captured agencies do.)
Great video from my friend GB #Narf
https://twitter.com/Nicolina0815/status/1865848482889597334
More reasons …. Autocorrect
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
