SiggestBhitter Profile picture
Dec 8 26 tweets 15 min read Read on X
An examination of Stephen Paddocks suitcases and bags: what the LVMPD and FBI's investigation missed, and why Paddock was not working alone.

A long, detailed, thread 🧵🪡 (1/26) Image
Image
According to the official narrative set by the LVMPD and FBI Stephen Paddock acted as a lone-wolf shooter, without motive, firing upon the crowds of the Route 91 Harvest Festival from his rooms on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay. Image
Image
Despite their insistence that Paddock acted as a lone wolf, what if we could prove that Paddock had worked with accomplices, using their own evidence, in the days leading up to the shooting? Image
Image
Image
Image
Lets start with the "Criminal Investigative Report" which I will refer to as "FIT report" from the LVMPD (link: ) which is the final report from the Force Investigation Team lvmpd.com/about/news-eve…Image
Image
Image
Image
The images I have attached to this thread over the last three posts can be found on pages 84-92 (highlights my own), from these images we can see a total of 10 suitcases, 1 duffel-bag, and 1 small black bag. Besides the images, they are sparsely mentioned in the FIT report. Image
Image
Image
Now that we have a visual understanding of the suitcases from the LVMPD lets compare that to the evidence recovered by the FBI. (link: pages 279-313)vault.fbi.gov/stephen-paddoc…
Creating tables we can see 11 suitcases, 1 duffel bag, and 1 small bag were recovered which shows 1 extra suitcase not visible from the FIT images. Along with this, the FBI adds an item location for each piece of evidence which I have grouped together. Image
Image
Image
Breaking down the locations, in location A1 we have 1 duffel bag and 3 suitcases, since there is only one duffel visible in the FIT images we know A1 is near the entertainment center. However, in the images we only see 2 suitcases, one of which is missing. Image
Image
Image
Vising the FIT report we see that they describe a suitcase in front of the entertainment center on the floor containing rifle cases. Why this suitcase is not imaged is unknown, but leaves room for speculation. Image
Image
In A2 there is only one suitcase containing a towel. As far as I am aware, this item was not photographed or included in any photographs from the LVMPD or FBI. Based on proximity, I believe this item located around the bar/kitchenette area. Image
In A4 we have two suitcases recovered from the floor. These are easy to identify as these are the only suitcases described as containing magazines. Image
Image
Image
Image
C1, referred to as the "Chaise Lounge", only has one small bag which I presume is the black bag on the floor here behind the shopping bags. Image
Image
C2 is interesting as the one suitcase in this location is not imaged. Why it is not imaged is up to speculation but from looking at the images closely and based on approximation and description I believe the item highlighted below is the suitcase. Image
Image
Image
Lastly, C3 contains 3 items, 2 of which are missing from images. The one visible suitcase in C3 is in close proximity to Paddocks body and the only item described by the FBI as "from floor/near window". Image
One could argue these are the suitcases next to the bed, but the descriptions and contents of the suitcases are inconsistent between the FBI data and the description from the FIT report. Image
Image
Image
Image
Overall, we can determine that the item in A4 is the "extra" item from the FBI report, with a definite total of 11 suitcases, one duffel-bag, and one small bag recovered from the crime scene.
Now that we have a consensus between the LVMPD and the FBI on the state of the suitcases found at the crime scene, lets compare that against surveillance camera footage released by the MGM. Image
For the MGM footage, I will reference the New York Times visual Investigation (link: ) which does a great job of compiling the footage and counting the suitcases, but not subtracting the suitcases Paddock leaves with.
Watching their video you can put together a timeline of when Paddock brought in and left the Mandalay Bay with suitcases/bags:
- Sep 25th, +5 suitcases, later leaves with -2
- 26th +7
- 27th, -2
- 28th, +3
- 30th, +4
- 10/1, +2 suitcases for a total of 17 suitcases

17 suitcases
If Paddock has 17 suitcases from the MGM surveillance footage, but the LVMPD and FBI only find 11 at the crime scene, that means 6 suitcases have gone missing in the days leading up to the shooting.
To get an idea of when 6 suitcases could have been handed out/picked up we can reference the Lock Interrogation Reports (LIR) from the FIT report starting on page 128. The LIR shows logs from the doors of the hotel rooms such as "opened from inside" "guest card accepted", etc. Image
Image
Using the timestamps from the MGM surveillance footage we can remove times from the LIR that we can infer are Paddock entering/leaving with luggage. Once removed we are left with remaining times when suitcases may have been handed out/picked up. A few examples below Image
Image
Image
Image
While its completely speculation at this point, one time period that stands out to me for suspicious activity is the night of the 28th, where according to the FIT Paddock is described as gambling "continuously" from 10PM until ~5AM the next day, despite the LIR showing otherwise Image
Image
Additional candidates for these handoffs could be ~3:12-3:15PM and ~9:38PM on September 29th. Unfortunately, the data is only accurate down to 1 minute,but both these times seem to show unusual internal activity from both doors, which is odd if Paddock was alone. Image
Image
In conclusion, when compiling the evidence from the LVMPD, MGM, and FBI we can create a timeline that is inconsistent with their conclusions, showing that evidence was missing from the crime scene which should have been present.
If the suitcases were simply removed by Paddock we have to wonder why the MGM wouldnt release that footage. To me, this points to the fact that Paddock was not working alone. Who he was working with? Thats the next question and a story for another day.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SiggestBhitter

SiggestBhitter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BiggestShitter

Oct 3
short thread on some of the connections between Stephen Paddock, NASA, and Jack Parsons 🧵🪡 Image
Image
To preface, these connections are not concrete, nor I do not think these connections really provide any meaningful reasoning as to why Paddock did what he did
To start with the most well known connection, Stephen Paddock worked as an auditor for Morton-Thiokol, a predecessor company to Lockheed Martin and the manufacturer of the O-rings which failed on the NASA Space Shuttle Challenger, from 1985-1988 Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Nov 10, 2023
When discussing the moon landing hoax, one thing that believers of the official story as told by NASA tend to say is "with so many people working on the Apollo projects, how did no one reveal the secret"

This is the story of one man who tried to speak out, Thomas Baron (long 🧵) Image
Thomas 'Tom' Baron was a quality control and safety inspector for the primary contractor of the Apollo Command Module. Initially employed by the Air Force at Eglin Air Force Base, he would later be hired by North American Aviation (NAA) Image
Working for NAA Thomas had extensive first hand experience with the numerous problems the Apollo project was facing. Baron attempted to voice these concerns multiple times, first in December 1966 stating "Something has to be done. Someone is going to get killed."
Read 16 tweets
May 23, 2023
What happens when you bring together NASA, Ceremonial Sex Magick, and just a dash of scientology? NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory, of course! A small 🧵 🪡 on Jack Parsons and the occult roots of NASA Image
Jack grew up on what is known as "millionaires mile" in Pasadena, California. His parents split at a young age and he would go to live with his mother where he would proceed to have little contact with his father. Jack's interest in the occult started at a young age.
At just 13 Parsons would go on to attempt summoning satan to trade his soul for a rocket ship, similar to the ones he would design later in life. Fearing that he was successful, this event would push him further into a life of the occult. Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(