Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Kostas Moros Profile picture
@MorosKostas
Dec 13, 2024 • 1 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
So New Jersey and Minnesota antigun politicians announce dual lawsuits against Glock and make all sorts of claims about what a callous and evil company it is...

...but then do not announce that they are going to ask their law enforcement agencies to end their contracts with Glock! In fact, in a footnote, they even say they do not want to disrupt the law enforcement exemption for full auto!

I guess Glock isn't too evil for taxpayer dollars, huh?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Kostas Moros

Kostas Moros Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MorosKostas

Kostas Moros Profile picture
Dec 30, 2025
As a bit of a sneak preview of an upcoming amicus brief, let's take a look at how much more it costs to buy a handgun in California compared to most of the rest of the country using a compact Walther PDP as an example. Image
As you can see above, a standard one with a 15 round magazine goes for $530 on Bass Pro's website.

But that website also lets you select the California-compliant model instead, which comes with the state-mandated loaded chamber indicator, magazine disconnect mechanism, and 10 round magazines. Those unwanted but required "features" turn a $530 gun into a $649 gun.Image
But we are only just getting started!

California also required a background check for every gun purchase. In most other states, that background check is free. But California charges a $31.19 Dealer Record of Sale fee, a $1 Firearms Safety Act Fee, and a $5 Safety and Enforcement fee. $37.19 in total for the background check.
Read 7 tweets
Kostas Moros Profile picture
Nov 21, 2025
The Supreme Court requested a response last week in a pro se petition filed by an extremely sympathetic petitioner caught up in an interstate carry mess.

I had not heard of this case before (pro se petitions are usually DOA), but given they called for a response, I will be considering an amicus brief in this case.Image
The questions presented, if granted, would obviously be narrowed. Image
The facts. Image
Read 7 tweets
Kostas Moros Profile picture
Nov 9, 2025
This article is misleading and also a masterclass in how to lie by omission. Let's break it down. Image
Two bits of background information you should know beforehand:

1. "Stand Your Ground" does one thing, and one thing only: it gets rid of any duty to retreat before lawful self-defense. Every other element of self-defense must still be present before you resort to lethal force, or you are going to prison. It mainly serves to stop asshole prosecutors from second-guessing whether you "could have run away instead" in a life-or-death situation.

2. Stand Your Ground is the law in most of the country, including many Democrat states like California and Colorado. Varying levels of duty to retreat basically only exist in the Northeast at this point, plus Minnesota. Wisconsin and Nebraska have their own hybrids too. The rest of the country has Stand Your Ground either by statute or via common law.Image
The article begins with a double-lie:

"In 30 states, it often requires only a claim you killed while protecting yourself or others."

First of all, it's not 30 states, it's more like 40. But we can already see where they are going: trying to obfuscate about the blue states that also have SYG via common law, to make this about the "bad" progun red states.

Second, it's not true that it only requires a "claim", you must have all the elements of self-defense. Sure, sometimes the facts can be murky, especially if the only other witness is dead, but that's the case with any self-defense claim.
Read 16 tweets
Kostas Moros Profile picture
Nov 8, 2025
This bit right here is completely outrageous to me. It is absolutely preposterous for a judge to redirect federal spending against what congress appropriated it for.

Why even have a separation of powers? Hell, the judge may as well order Congress to end the shutdown on his precise terms. What would be the difference? He is already taking over the power of the purse with this order.Image
I don't even think it was right for the judge to order the spending of the very limited contingency funds, as judges should not get to decide how money designated for an emergency gets spent.

However, at least that point was arguable. The further step he took was baseless and constitution-torching.
I hope the Supreme Court intervenes on this. I wish @AGPamBondi and team the best of luck.

Shutdowns are a high-stakes political game. If you are going to keep the government shutdown, it can't be the case that you get to run to courts and have your priorities ordered to be funded.

Congress has not appropriated more money for SNAP. The program basically doesn't exist until they do. Federal judges should not get to order it back into existence.

As the left likes to say, NO KINGS!
Read 6 tweets
Kostas Moros Profile picture
Oct 20, 2025
California just filed its opposition to the cert petition in Duncan, let's see what they argue. A thread on the brief.Image
"May acquire as many approved firearms as they want" is a funny point, because it has only been true for a few months since California lost in Nguyen. California was trying to limit us to one gun per month.Image
As is always the case, antigunners want very expansive definitions of mass shootings EXCEPT when arguing to uphold AWBs and mag limits, then all of a sudden they want to limit it to the worst (and most rare) mass shootings. The GVA definition goes out the window immediately. Image
Read 15 tweets
Kostas Moros Profile picture
Oct 1, 2025
This local news segment is funny because Sheriff Luna ADMITS they have been making people wait too long, while in their official PR statements, they are denying that.

He says:

"I wish we didn't have to make people wait too long, but we've got to do it right, I don't want to be issuing CCWs to people who shouldn't have them."Image
Also, his point is nonsense.

He could simply require a livescan and a training course, and skip the rest. That's what every other state does (some don't even have the training course) and yet they have no issue with people with CCW permits committing lots of crimes. In fact, they rarely ever do.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(