Colin Gorrie Profile picture
Dec 13, 2024 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
English spelling is a cruel joke

Why does ‘gh’ stay silent in “daughter” but sound like an ‘f’ in “laughter”?

The thing is, English spelling is actually 100% logical — for the Middle Ages

Here’s how the 'gh' sound disappeared from English, and left chaos in its wake…🧵 Image
In the beginning, the letters ‘gh’ meant something consistent

“Laughter”, “daughter”, “night”, “through” — all used to have the same sound

It was a harsh throat sound — like the ‘ch’ in Scottish “loch” or German “Bach”

But around 1400 AD, some people stopped saying it… Image
Around 1400, people started making mistakes with ‘gh’.

Some started writing “nyte” for “night” — showing ‘gh’ had no sound.

They also started adding ‘gh’ into the spelling of words which never had the ‘gh’ sound before — so “delite” became “delight”.

The chaos was seeping in… Image
It wasn’t the same everywhere — the ‘gh’ sound hung around for longer in some places than others.

But by 1569, some dialects had completely lost the ‘gh’ sound.

In other dialects, the ‘gh’ sound remained — for them, the ‘gh’-less versions of words were barbarous... Image
Another change was going on at the same time — the harsh ‘gh’ sound made at the back of the mouth began shifting to an ‘f’ sound.

Educated speakers resisted this change too — they saw it as vulgar and clownish.

But they wouldn’t hold out for long. Image
By 1625, even educated writers were using ‘f’ sounds in words like “laugh", “rough”, and “draught” — just like we do today.

For a few words, the version where ‘gh’ sounded like ‘f’ was so popular that we’ve forgotten that they ever had a ‘gh’ to begin with. Image
One word whose ‘gh’ became an ‘f’ is “dwarf”

Dwarf used to be pronounced more like “dwargh”, with that harsh ‘gh’ at the end

But today there’s no trace of that old ‘gh’ — even in the spelling.

Other words were more controversial… Image
Sometimes, two versions of the same word competed — some people said “daughter” with a silent ‘gh’, while others said it with an ‘f’.

Even into the 17th century, it seemed like the forms with ‘f’ might take over entirely.

We might be saying “thruff” instead of “through”... Image
By 1750, things had settled down to how things are today — every ‘gh’ has just one pronunciation.

‘Gh’ is either silent or sounds like ‘f’, depending on the word.

But if you don’t know the word already, there’s no way to guess what it will be — total chaos… Image
The reason for all this chaos is simple: London

London was the centre of life in England starting in the late Middle Ages — it attracted people from all over

These newcomers to London spoke in different ways — as a result, the speech of London became a mix of different forms… Image
Sometimes the version of a word where ‘gh’ sounded like ‘f’ won out — other times the version with silent ‘gh’ won

After hundreds of years of arguing over how ‘gh’ should be pronounced, we finally had an answer

Unfortunately for students of English, the answer was “it depends”. Image
If you enjoyed this thread:

1) Please retweet the original post (linked below)

2) Follow for more threads about language, history, and culture!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Colin Gorrie

Colin Gorrie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @colingorrie

Apr 29
Think Americans butchered English? Think again.

Many “Americanisms” that sound wrong to British ears are actually ghosts of older English.

Forms Shakespeare himself might recognize.

Here’s the story of the English that died in England — but lives on in America 🧵 Image
Take “gotten” — which sounds like an American innovation.

But Shakespeare used it: “Henry the Sixth hath lost / All that which Henry the Fifth had gotten?”

It’s Britain that innovated by simplifying to “got.”

And there are many more examples like this. Image
Vocabulary tells a similar story.

Americans mostly say “fall” for the season. Brits prefer “autumn.”

But “fall” (short for “fall of the leaf”) was common in 16th-century England.

“Autumn” only gained ground later.

Again, America preserved what Britain discarded… Image
Read 13 tweets
Apr 25
Most people know Chaucer as a great poet.

But he didn't just write "The Canterbury Tales" — he helped forge modern English.

Here’s how one medieval poet paved the way for the language you're reading right now... (thread) 🧵 Image
Picture 14th Century England: the English language isn't on top.

French rules the court, Latin the Church.

English is a patchwork of dialects spoken by ordinary people.

Hardly the stuff great literature is made of, at least until one poet arrived... Image
His contemporaries praised him.

They called him the "firste fyndere of oure faire language" (Hoccleve) and "embelissher of ornate eloquence" (Caxton).

Not because he invented words from thin air, but because he elevated what already existed in English.

How did he achieve this? Image
Read 15 tweets
Apr 22
Ever called a raccoon a “trash panda”?

If so, you’ve used an ancient poetic technique called a “kenning” — the same one that transformed a Viking sword into a “battle serpent.”

This technique reveals something fascinating about how our minds process language... (thread) 🧵 Image
A kenning isn't just a metaphor — it's a compound where one part doesn't directly name what's being described.

When you say “trash panda,” your mind doesn't just substitute “raccoon.”

It processes multiple images: first trash, then pandas, then maps similarities to raccoons… Image
This multi-step processing is the key to why kennings feel so satisfying.

When the Beowulf poet wrote “world-candle” (sun) or “bone-house” (body), he wasn’t just being obscure.

He was building layered images — creating richer cognitive associations than simple nouns can. Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 18
The sea preserves words that died on land centuries ago.

Words like “lee,” “abaft,” and “starboard” are living fossils of Old English.

They survive in sailors’ speech after disappearing from everyday language.

Here are the 1000-year-old words only sailors know... (thread) 🧵 Image
“Starboard” comes from Old English “steorbord” — literally “steer board.”

Early ships had their steering oar on the right side, so the right side became known as the “steer side.”

This use of “board” to mean “side” is related to the word “border.”

This is just one of many… Image
The opposite of “starboard” today is “port,” but that’s a relatively new word.

It used to be “larboard,” perhaps from Old English “ladbord” — the side you would load onto while at port.

It was replaced by “port” to avoid confusion, since “larboard” sounds like “starboard.” Image
Read 13 tweets
Apr 15
The word “she” shouldn't exist.

If English had followed its normal evolutionary path, men AND women would be referred to as “he.”

But they’re not — and this reveals something fascinating about how languages evolve... (thread) 🧵 Image
In Old English (450–1100 AD), “she” was “heo” and “he” was “he.”

As the language evolved, the ‘eo’ sound (pronounced like ‘eyoh’) typically transformed into ‘ee.’

This means both would have sounded identical: “he” for both men and women.

But something else happened instead… Image
Sometimes, languages accept sound changes that create ambiguity.

But not this time: instead, alternatives to “heo” arose.

In the south they said “hoo,” in the north “scho,” and East Midlands speakers used “sche.”

But why did these variations emerge in the first place? Image
Read 12 tweets
Apr 11
The King James Bible isn't just a religious text.

It's the most influential work in the history of the English language — giving us more phrases than all of Shakespeare put together.

And it contains a hidden linguistic mystery most people never notice... 🧵 Image
The King James Version (KJV) sounds old-fashioned to us with all its “thou,” “thee”, and “begat.”

But its language was already old-fashioned in 1611 when it was published.

The mystery: Why would translators create a “modern” Bible that sounded old to its first readers? Image
The translators wanted sacred gravitas.

They believed the Bible should sound different from everyday speech — set apart, weighty, authoritative.

This deliberate archaism worked so well that it became the template for how authority itself should sound in English... Image
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(