Liberal Voice for Women Profile picture
Dec 14, 2024 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
It is now 8 months since the Cass Review was published and still there is no formal statement from the @libdems about whether the Party accepts the findings of the Cass Review. For those who are still wondering why, the events of this week help exemplify. 🧵
On the 11th Dec the Secretary of State for Health, @wesstreeting, announced an indefinite ban on puberty blockers for treating children with gender dysphoria. He cited an unsafe prescribing environment and lack of safety and efficacy data in this cohort. See 👇 Image
He also called the historic situation of prescribing puberty blockers to children with gender dysphoria without a proper evidence base a ‘scandal.’ Strong words indeed from a Secretary of State. Observers may assume the @LibDems would finally come off the fence re Cass Review Image
Three Lib Dem MPs spoke inc. the Health spx @HelenMorganMP and Equalities spx @cajardineMP - neither stated they accepted Cass. Instead they chose to speak about long waiting lists and toxic debate. A new MP @VikkiSlade72 then spoke see 😢
The LGBT+ Lib Dems then released the following statement about the indefinite ban. Image
Without a formal statement on Cass or Streeting’s latest decision, some people think this is the Lib Dem position. Hard to know where to start with the hyperbole and false equivalency, e.g. calling a 4-yr review with 7 peer-reviewed studies equivalent to ‘anti-vax research’
There are activists in the Party with the ear of senior leaders. One of them wrote in Bylines Times with echoes of the LGBT+ statement. TL:DR Belcher agrees with MP Sobel - it’s discriminatory not to give these drugs to gender distressed children because they’re used elsewhere. Image
So, onto why the Party has stayed quiet. Institutional capture? Yes. Not wanting to upset the vocal trans lobby in the Party? Yes, definitely that. Divided opinion in the Party? Yes. Not just Slade but others, including the 4 Lib Dem Cambridgeshire MPs

Just this week Dr Cass was asked about the non-response of the Lib Dems to her Review in an interview. In the Politics Home interview they describe her as having a ‘defeated look.’ politicshome.com/thehouse/artic…Image
However strong leaders and those with integrity know the right thing is rarely the easy thing. When a Secretary of State for Health is calling the historic medical treatment of children a scandal, the @LibDems need to take note, they need to break their silence. #CourageCalls Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Liberal Voice for Women

Liberal Voice for Women Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LibVoice4Women

Jun 24
Delighted @angusmacdlibdem spoke up as a @LibDems MP for child safeguarding yesterday on the puberty blocker trial. “I believe that as Members of Parliament, we have an overriding moral responsibility to protect the most vulnerable in our society, especially children.” 🧵
The front bench LD statement read by @AlisonEBennett. She didn't allow any interventions. She said “We will listen to the experts and the clinicians” but sometimes external scrutiny's required – medical scandals exist – from infected blood to thalidomide
Then @cajardineMP talked about “children who have a genuine fear of what puberty will bring” but of course the answer to that is not to chemically prevent the natural process of children becoming adults but to support them with talking therapies.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 14
Last Sunday TW Tanya-Jayne engaged with our YouGov survey of members to tell everyone how wrong we were. His beef is LVW saying we hold the majority view - technically majority view means >50% rather than just more ppl agree with us. Let’s look at this 🧵
libdemvoice.org/liberal-voice-…
So where do we have more than 50% of members agreeing with us? Let’s start by looking at medicalisation of children. Here we clearly hold the majority view regarding puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones. Over 50% of members agree children with GD shouldn't receive these drugs: Image
What about ensuring a gender recognition certificate is not made easier to get but requires medical sign-off? And that the non-transitioning spouse can exit the marriage before a gender recognition certificate is obtained? Again, we hold the majority view (>60% here!) Image
Read 9 tweets
May 23
Long time Lib Dem trans activist, Wiltshire councillor & TransActual director Helen Belcher has written in the @BylineTimes today about the EHRC ruling. Worth having a good look at some of what Belcher says [1/n]: bylinetimes.com/2026/05/22/thi…
Blecher discusses the EHRC 'interim guidance' (it wasn't guidance, it was an update) and implies it was wrong due to being taken down around time of Good Law Project case. Nowhere does the article say the EHRC won that High Court case and that the interim update was lawful 2/n Image
Belcher bemoans the lack of 'meaningful' consultation with trans people (anyone could respond to the consultation - does Belcher want preferential treatment?) and says draft guidance 'rejected' Additions were made but is 'rejection' factually correct to describe what went on?3/n Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 19, 2025
The @LibDems have been held over a barrel this election by LGBT+ LD ('Plus'). Firstly their treasurer brought 'Move to Next Business' motion. This meant a conf. debate on changing the quota designed to help women's representation ('women's' quota) couldn't be changed at conf. 🧵 Image
Then when @LibDems obtained legal advice agreeing the quotas were not compliant with the Equality Act and so put forward revised guidance for the elections, Plus were furious and used the entire Party machinery to get rid of the guidance. Presidential candidates, appeal panels
They called for all diversity-quotas to be suspended if they couldn't get their way. We pointed out this could also be detrimental for ethnic monitories and those with disabilities but of course 'trans demands trump all' (TDTA) lgbtlibdems.org.uk/civicrm/petiti…Image
Read 14 tweets
Nov 14, 2025
In this second post on the revisionism currently going through the @LibDems is the general acceptance that the quotas do need to change and so now clearly everyone is saying 'why didn't someone do something sooner?' Of course we first tried in 2023 after the first FWS case. 🧵 Image
The above is a fairly typical response from the trans lobby. Already in 2023 it was clear that self-ID couldn't be used as the basis of quotas and allowing non-binary people into both the men's and women's quotas was inherently unfair. But we were told to leave for raising it. Image
That wasn't the only abuse we received for daring to try to make the quotas compliant with the Equality Act. Councillors and Party Officers liked and shared messages likening us to a pubic lice infestation & speculating how much insecticide it would take get rid of us. Image
Read 12 tweets
Nov 13, 2025
One reason @LibDems found it hard to change the quotas is that the trans lobby have convinced them of several 'misdemeanours' of knowing what sex someone is and treating them as such (either through words or policies) or by not performatively agreeing they've changed sex. 👉🧵 Image
Some examples or the use of these terms in the wild of the @LibDems. 'Othered' / 'othering' from Lib Dem Voice articles: Image
'Outed' or 'outing': being used here in articles about the quotas in Lib Dem Voice by both of the presidential candidates. This ignores the Lib Dem election regulations which states that giving info to access quotas may allow people to discern information about candidates: Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(