If you think the collapse of the Soviet Union was good for the people, think again. Let’s take a closer look at what democracy and capitalism brought to Russia in the 1990s.
In the 1990s, the Soviet Union fell apart, and Russia began moving towards a market economy. However, this transition brought with it a severe economic collapse, widespread poverty, and a sharp rise in organized crime.
The “Grab-itization” of an Entire Country
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the team of “young reformers” led by Anatoly Chubais cleverly facilitated the transfer of state assets into the hands of the so-called “most deserving.” Naturally, this process was presented under the banner of “universal equality and justice.” Conveniently, the “most deserving” turned out to be those with close ties to Western corporations.
For example, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, through his company Yukos, and his ties to the Rockefeller family, was on the verge of transferring significant control of Russia’s oil reserves to foreign corporations before his arrest halted the process.
Here are the names of the oligarchs who made fortune by stealing from the naive Soviets who just lost their country:
Mikhail Khodorkovsky (Yukos) - ties with ExxonMobil, Chevron, and Rockefeller Foundation
Boris Berezovsky - connections with British companies and offshore financial institutions
Roman Abramovich - deals involving Sibneft and ownership of Chelsea FC, Vladimir Gusinsky (Media-Most) - partnerships with Credit Suisse and European banks
Vladimir Potanin (Interros) - collaborations with international investment funds and metallurgical corporations
Mikhail Fridman (Alfa Group) - partnership with BP through TNK-BP and offshore businesses in the UK and US
Anatoly Chubais - support from IMF, World Bank, and foreign consultants during privatization efforts.
The tool for the “honest” expropriation of money from the population was the voucher. This document supposedly gave every Russian citizen the right to a small share of state property. Initially, it was said that a voucher could buy you two brand-new Volga cars. Soon, its value dropped to the equivalent of two cases of vodka. The decline continued until a voucher was worth no more than two bottles of liquor.
Meanwhile, state property that was privatized began to concentrate in the hands of particularly cunning individuals. And so, Russia saw the rise of its first oligarchs.
Currency Operations
Until the summer of 1992, the dollar was officially valued at the Soviet-era exchange rate of around 56 kopecks. Of course, buying dollars at this rate was impossible, and the black-market rate was much higher. It’s clear that some people made huge profits from this gap.
Then, almost overnight, the exchange rate skyrocketed by 222 times, reaching 125 rubles per dollar.
The Rise of Prostitution in Russia
With foreign currency becoming more accessible and borders opening up, “currency prostitution” emerged on a larger scale in Russia. While it had existed before, it was never this widespread. This profession was seen as both prestigious and respected during the 1990s. Currency prostitutes were often better off financially than the wives of Soviet party officials in the 1980s. Surveys even showed that being a currency prostitute ranked among the top ten most desirable professions for schoolgirls at the time.
The overall difficult economic situation pushed thousands of Russian women into prostitution. By some estimates, there were around 180,000 sex workers in Russia during the 1990s, with one in six operating in Moscow.
At the same time, previously unheard-of forms of prostitution emerged, including male and child prostitution.
The Era of Banditry
When people talk about the 1990s in Russia, one of the first things that comes to mind is the surge in crime. Private entrepreneurship began to emerge during this time, but it was immediately targeted by so-called “bandits” who demanded protection money. To operate without interference, many entrepreneurs resorted to bribing law enforcement.
Criminal groups established their own rules, though they often broke them, leading to violent clashes between rival gangs. This period saw a dramatic increase in murders involving firearms and explosives compared to Soviet times.
Aside from “gang wars,” people could also be killed for refusing to pay “protection money.” Another common motive for murder was to seize an apartment, especially in desirable neighborhoods. In Moscow alone, around 15,000 elderly, single apartment owners lost their lives during this time.
A Dying Russia
The demographic statistics of the 1990s were grim. According to estimates by Communist Party deputies, Russia lost 4.2 million people between 1992 and 1998, with the population shrinking by 300,000 each year. The situation was especially dire in villages and small towns, where the decline was most visible. It is estimated that around 20,000 villages across the country became completely deserted.
The pensions received by the elderly were insufficient to cover basic living expenses, falling below the subsistence minimum. This financial strain forced many to continue working or seek alternative income sources to survive.
Simultaneously, the country experienced a surge in alcoholism, exacerbated by the influx of cheap foreign alcoholic beverages. The increased availability and affordability of alcohol led to higher consumption rates, as people sought to escape the harsh realities of daily life. Tragically, many individuals suffered poisoning from various alcohol substitutes, leading to numerous deaths and severe health complications.
After the Soviet Union collapsed, the country’s borders opened up, leading to a surge in drug trafficking. Much of the supply came from Central Asia and Afghanistan, bringing in heroin and other opiates.
During this time, cheap synthetic drugs like “krokodil” also appeared, along with growing use of amphetamines and marijuana. The healthcare system and law enforcement were unprepared to deal with this growing problem, leading to a drug addiction crisis throughout the decade.
Homelessness was virtually nonexistent in the Soviet Union, but in the 1990s, it became a widespread crisis. The number of homeless children surged to levels not seen since the post-war years, when many were orphaned during the Great Patriotic War. By the 1990s, this figure had skyrocketed, reaching approximately 2 million.
Another blow
The Russian default of 1998 was a catastrophic financial crisis that deeply affected ordinary citizens. The government declared it could no longer pay its debts, leading to the collapse of the ruble and wiping out people’s savings almost overnight. Inflation soared, prices of basic goods skyrocketed, and millions of Russians fell below the poverty line. Banks froze accounts, leaving people without access to their money, and many businesses went bankrupt, resulting in mass unemployment. The default eroded public trust in financial institutions and the government, and for many, it symbolized the failure of the economic reforms of the 1990s.
In the late Soviet Union during the 1980s, the poverty rate was estimated at around 1-2%, but in the 1990s, it skyrocketed to 30-50%.
The Great Giveaway: How Russia Fueled Western Prosperity in the 1990s
In the 1990s, Russia’s industries that could compete with the West, such as automotive manufacturing, aviation, locomotive production, turbines, and electric motors, were dismantled. What remained were low-value-added sectors like resource extraction and metallurgy, which did little to improve the standard of living for Russian citizens. The West gained massive new markets for its products, driving rapid industrial growth in Western Europe and the United States.
Through the exploitative privatization process, foreigners acquired control over key Russian production and resource assets for next to nothing. This allowed them to extract profits through dividends and unofficially through imposed services, effectively funneling capital out of the country. Western economies also benefited from cheap energy resources supplied by Russia, sustaining their prosperity for decades.
One striking example is the 1994 “Gore-Chernomyrdin uranium deal,” where the U.S. acquired nearly all of the weapons-grade uranium stockpiled by the Soviet Union, 500 tons, for just $11.9 billion.
Western countries gained access to Russia’s latest inventions and applied scientific developments. During the 1990s, Russian research institutes handed over their innovations for next to nothing through joint ventures. Once the ideas were extracted, these joint ventures were typically shut down.
In the 1990s, a significant number of skilled professionals from the post-Soviet space—scientists, engineers, and programmers—relocated to countries like Australia, Canada, and the United States, fueling advancements in science, education, and the IT sector. By 2003, around 800 Russian programmers were working at Microsoft’s headquarters in Redmond. These were individuals who had emigrated in the 1990s and played a crucial role in developing the world’s leading operating system, helping to establish Microsoft as a monopoly in the industry.
The enabler: President Yeltsin
The 1996 presidential elections in Russia remain one of the most controversial and corrupt in the country’s history. Boris Yeltsin, whose popularity had plummeted due to economic collapse, mass poverty, and the chaos of the 1990s, faced a very real threat of losing to Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov. With approval ratings hovering around 5-6% at the start of the campaign, Yeltsin’s victory seemed almost impossible without outside interference.
Yeltsin’s campaign received unprecedented financial and media support from Russia’s oligarchs and Western governments. State resources were funneled into his re-election campaign, and the media—controlled by influential oligarchs—engaged in relentless propaganda. Television channels and newspapers portrayed Yeltsin as the “savior of democracy” while demonizing his opponents, ensuring no fair representation of the political alternatives.
Buying Votes and Bribing Officials
A large portion of the electorate, struggling with poverty, was influenced by promises of pensions, salaries, and financial benefits that never materialized after the election. There were also reports of widespread vote-buying, intimidation of voters, and manipulation of election commissions to favor Yeltsin.
The West played a key role in securing Yeltsin’s victory, as a weakened Russia was highly advantageous for their interests. Western advisers were brought in to guide his campaign with modern strategies, while significant financial aid was directed to bolster his efforts. This degree of foreign involvement cast serious doubt on the sovereignty of Russia’s democratic process.
Although Yeltsin was declared the winner, his second term was marked by continued economic turmoil, the Chechen war, and the further rise of oligarchic rule. The corrupt nature of his re-election deeply disillusioned the Russian public with democracy and paved the way for authoritarian tendencies in the years that followed.
For those who claim that the Bolsheviks were primarily Jewish, here’s a reality check: In the 1990s, after decades of suppression under Soviet rule, the Chabad movement reestablished itself in Russia. Following the collapse of the USSR and the introduction of religious freedoms, Chabad began rebuilding Jewish life by opening synagogues, schools, and community centers across the country. Supported by global Chabad networks and influential figures like oligarch Lev Leviev, they became a leading force in the revival of Judaism. Through strong ties with the government and extensive outreach programs, Chabad played a crucial role in restoring Jewish identity and presence in post-Soviet Russia.
The 1990s in Russia were marked by a series of devastating terrorist attacks.
One of the earliest major incidents occurred in 1995, when Chechen separatists took more than 1,000 hostages in a hospital in Budyonnovsk. The standoff, which lasted several days, ended with over 100 people killed after a failed Russian military assault.
In 1996, another high-profile attack took place in Kizlyar, when Chechen militants seized a hospital and took hundreds of hostages. They used civilians as human shields while escaping, leading to a deadly confrontation with Russian forces.
Smaller-scale bombings and hostage-takings were also frequent, targeting civilians, public transport, and infrastructure. For example, explosions in Moscow metro stations and other urban centers spread fear and insecurity across the population.
The 1999 apartment bombings were among the deadliest terrorist attacks of the decade, with a series of explosions in Moscow, Buynaksk, and Volgodonsk killing nearly 300 people and injuring hundreds more.
In the 1990s, Russia’s economy was in deep crisis. Thousands of industrial enterprises and research institutes closed down, leaving millions without jon. As a result, many Russians turned to trade to survive.
Pensioners turned to small-scale street trading, selling cigarettes, sunflower seeds, and other minor goods to make ends meet.
There were also some truly disturbing entrepreneurial efforts. For example, morgue workers and forensic experts were found to be involved in the trafficking of human organs.
In general, people across the country did whatever they could to survive—and somehow, they managed. This chaos continued until Putin came to power, pulling the nation out of its downward spiral, earning him the lasting gratitude of majority Russians.
But, but, but... "The USSR and Hitler allied and started WWII together.” Nope. That’s the Western fairytale about the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact which was a pact about neutrality: I don't attack you, you don't attack me. Multiple European countries signed agreements and non-aggression pacts with Hitler; the USSR was the last. Hitler broke it, but Stalin knew he would do it. But let’s talk about the real development of events and not the bedtime stories sold to you in schoolbooks or elsewhere. 🧵👇
To understand what happened, we need to get the context. Let's roll two decades back when Russia was bleeding in the Civil War. Exactly at that moment, Poland saw its chance and launched the Soviet-Polish war that you never heard about. So, Russia had two wars at the same time: the civil war and the Soviet-Polish war. Such a mischievous move wasn't new for Poland. For centuries, it tried to grab the western lands of Rus’, especially during Russia’s weakest moments like the Mongol invasion and the Time of Troubles.
You might ask, how do we know that these lands were Russian? Here is the answer: These were the Rus' lands where Rus' people lived, spoke Old Russian before even Poland came around in 966 and followed Orthodox faith. ⬇️
When the Polish szlachta (elites) swept into these lands, they did not come to coexist. They came with fire and sword, forcing Catholicism and Polonization at the cost of blood. Villages were set ablaze, the Orthodox faith was hunted down, the Russian language silenced, women and children butchered.
Contrast this with the Mongols: for all their tribute-taking, they never touched the Russian Church, language, or national soul. Poland, however, sought nothing less than to erase Rus’ itself. The relentless persecutions of Orthodox Russians on lands seized time and again by Poland remain one of the defining scars of Russo-Polish relations.
And what was the end result of this madness? The Polish elite’s own arrogance and short-sighted policies drove their country into oblivion. By the 18th century, Poland vanished from the map, surviving only as a memory until World War I. Btw, Russia did not “swallow” Poland. The bulk of the genuinely Polish lands fell to Prussia and Austria. Russia took eastern lands (White Russia, Little Russia) that had historically been part of Rus’. ⬇️
From Kirov to Kirk: Political Assassinations and Lessons from the Past
Sometimes one bullet drowns out every speech. In December 1934, Sergei Kirov was shot in the head in Leningrad. He was one of the most popular figures in Soviet politics, full of energy, trusted by workers, and known as a loyal supporter of Stalin. The man who pulled the trigger, Leonid Nikolaev, appeared to be a bitter outsider with a tangled personal life and a deep resentment toward Kirov.
But soon after, investigators uncovered his links to opposition circles tied to Zinoviev and Trotsky, both long-time enemies of Stalin and connected with foreign intelligence.
🧵👇
Trotsky was already abroad, living off steady streams of financial and political backing from the West. Archives leave no doubt about his ties: articles printed in France and the US, networks of émigrés and private sponsors.
Right after Kirov’s murder, Moscow held open trials. Testimony revealed that both the “left” opposition around Trotsky and the “right” bloc of Bukharin and Rykov were entangled with foreign intelligence.
Names came up again and again: German, Polish, Japanese, French, British, even American circles that offered money and publicity to Trotsky’s supporters.
The plan behind it was simple enough: A future war would break the USSR into pieces. Poland, Japan, and Germany would take their share of land. Trotsky and his allies would be rewarded with power for helping make it happen.
That is why the purges began. The country was crawling with spies, couriers, and sympathizers, all feeding outside interests. And the warning signs had been there long before. Back in 1927 the Soviet leadership had already declared that war was no longer a distant threat but an approaching reality.
⬇️
Atmosphere of Hatred
In the 1930s, opposition propaganda thrived on discontent, stoking anger at the state. The same pattern is visible in the US today: years of media pressure, demonization of the right, and the careful crafting of an “enemy” from within their own citizens.
Right after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the media rushed to call the shooter a “lone wolf.” But haven’t we heard that before? History shows how often so-called loners turn out to be tools of larger forces or simple patsies. The real question is whether America has the strength to begin its own trials of cleansing. And if that moment comes, under what name will it be remembered?
Let’s take a look today at the city of Chita. Usually the chorus goes: ‘Well, Moscow may be fine, but just step outside of Moscow and you’ll see…’ So let’s take that step. Chita is a small city, located very far from Moscow. It’s an old city, with its history going back to the 15th century, and it began to truly develop during the construction of the Trans-Siberian Railway.
After the Treaty of Nerchinsk (1689) between Russia and China, the status of Transbaikalia was secured for Russia, and the Buryats gradually became part of it. In the 18th century, the Buryats entered Russian allegiance, retaining considerable autonomy and their own lands. In return, they received protection from the Manchus and Mongols, as well as access to trade.
Distance to the Mongolian border (Kyakhta) - 716 km.
Distance to the Chinese border (Zabaykalsk) - 490 km.
Distance to Moscow - 6,310 km.
Yesterday we discussed the Second World War in Europe, where the Red Army destroyed 75–80% of the Wehrmacht. Today, let’s turn to what happened in China.
Japan launched its war against China in 1937, which is why many historians mark that year as the true beginning of World War II in Asia. A lesser-known fact is that in 1939 Japan also clashed with the USSR at Khalkhin Gol, where Soviet forces under General Zhukov delivered a decisive defeat. On September 15, 1939, the Soviet–Japanese Ceasefire Agreement was signed in Moscow.
After that, Japan no longer attempted to attack the USSR, but instead intensified its brutal campaign in China and Korea, killing civilians, sending people to concentration camps, and pursuing outright territorial conquest.
In the Second World War, between 15 and 29 million Chinese died, including 3 to 4 million soldiers (some estimates are even higher).
China fought back against Japan and played a major role in wearing down the enemy, though this contribution is rarely acknowledged in the West.
Many people assume the Americans did most of the fighting in the Pacific, but that was primarily a naval war near Japan. In China, it was a vast land war, especially in Manchuria in the northeast, with massive battles that tied down much of the Japanese Army, a fact still largely absent from Western narratives.
On the occasion of the parade in China marking victory over fascism, Trump hurried to remind everyone about the “massive amount of support and blood that the US gave to China in order to secure FREEDOM from a very unfriendly foreign invader. Many Americans died in China’s quest for victory and Glory.” So let’s unpack that.
It is true that the US provided help but, as Chinese historians put it, it was “extremely limited and highly calculating.”
In reality, around 65,000 American soldiers were present in China during WWII. By contrast, the Red Army fielded about 1.5 million troops in the final campaign.
The U.S. sent about $1.6 billion in Lend-Lease aid, plus the Flying Tigers and some military advisors. But this support came with its own agenda. The Chinese historian even describe pre-1949 relations between the two countries as resembling those of “colonizer and colonized.”
The Soviets, by contrast, stepped in earlier with hundreds of planes, tanks, artillery, ammunition, fuel, and even military experts on the ground, sometimes hauling supplies through blizzards to get them there. Meanwhile, Chinese troops fought on relentlessly, launching major offensives and guerrilla operations like the Battle of 100 Regiments, steadily wearing down Japan’s forces on the mainland.
Finnish President Stubb calls on Europe to unite against the “common threat.” Oh, how boring and repetitive. Where have we heard that before? Ah yes, when Finland joined Hitler in his campaign against the USSR, dreaming of new territories.
Remember Finland's rallying cry to join forces with Hitler: "Join us in a holy war against our nation's enemies. Together with Germany's powerful military, as brothers-in-arms, we embark on a crusade to secure Finland's future."
And guess what? Churchill was right there, holding Mannerheim’s hand. Didn’t know that?
Then let’s unpack👇🧵
1/5
Western textbooks love to paint Churchill as the bulldog of Europe: stubborn, fierce, never yielding. But when it came to Finland and its Marshal, Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim, Churchill’s role was something else entirely. He was soothing and applauding. Churchill held Mannerheim’s hand with words, with gestures, with moral encouragement while letting him walk straight into the fire against the Soviet Union.
During a Cabinet meeting on February 12, 1940, Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty, proposed dispatching Brigadier Christopher Ling to Helsinki for his mission to bolster Marshal Mannerheim's spirits and deliver precise intel.
2/5
When the Soviet Union struck Finland in 1939 after a failed attempt to find a peaceful resolution for a serious security concern for the USSR and Finland's cooperation with Hitler began, Mannerheim stood as the symbol of Finnish resistance. The West cheered him on. Churchill, in particular, praised his courage and even floated the idea of sending a British officer to Helsinki to “boost morale.” But it was theater. No divisions landed, no serious supplies arrived. Finland was left alone against the Red Army, while London and Paris used Mannerheim as a poster child of “small nations fighting totalitarianism.”
Finnish President Stubb calls on Europe to unite against the “common threat.” Oh, how boring and repetitive. Where have we heard that before? Ah yes, when Finland joined Hitler in his campaign against the USSR, dreaming of new territories.
Remember Finland's rallying cry to join forces with Hitler: "Join us in a holy war against our nation's enemies. Together with Germany's powerful military, as brothers-in-arms, we embark on a crusade to secure Finland's future."
And guess what? Churchill was right there, holding Mannerheim’s hand. Didn’t know that?
Then let’s unpack.
.👇🧵
1/5
Western textbooks love to paint Churchill as the bulldog of Europe: stubborn, fierce, never yielding. But when it came to Finland and its Marshal, Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim, Churchill’s role was something else entirely. He was soothing and applauding. Churchill held Mannerheim’s hand with words, with gestures, with moral encouragement while letting him walk straight into the fire against the Soviet Union.
During a Cabinet meeting on February 12, 1940, Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty, proposed dispatching Brigadier Christopher Ling to Helsinki for his mission to bolster Marshal Mannerheim's spirits and deliver precise intel.
2/5
When the Soviet Union struck Finland in 1939 after a failed attempt to find a peaceful resolution for a serious security concern for the USSR and Finland's cooperation with Hitler began, Mannerheim stood as the symbol of Finnish resistance. The West cheered him on. Churchill, in particular, praised his courage and even floated the idea of sending a British officer to Helsinki to “boost morale.” But it was theater. No divisions landed, no serious supplies arrived. Finland was left alone against the Red Army, while London and Paris used Mannerheim as a poster child of “small nations fighting totalitarianism.”