Logan Lancing Profile picture
Dec 17 26 tweets 4 min read Read on X
I’ve seen various content claiming that “Woke Right” is a stupid name because “Woke” just means “awakened to and forwarding critiques of social power."

Woke is much more than that. I can't tell if they still don't know that, or they're aware...

Let's define "Woke" again.

🧵
“Critical Constructivism” is the technical term for Woke. “Critical” for the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt school and offshoots (there’s a million “critical theories” now, Critical Race Theory and Queer Theory being the ones people are most familiar with).
To quote Woke educator Joe Kincheloe, "Critical constructivism is grounded on the Frankfurt School's formulation of critical theory."

So why Critical Theory?
Again, to borrow from Kincheloe, "Critical theory is concerned with extending a human's consciousness of himself or herself as a social being in light of the way dominant power operates to manage knowledge."
"Critical constructivism thus promotes reflection on the production of self."

So, critical theories extend an individual's consciousness. They help individuals "awaken" to the fact that they are "social beings" produced by dominant power through knowledge.
What does this mean? It means that critical theories critique systems of power and seek to demonstrate how systems and structures of power CREATE YOU as a product. How "systemic power" alienates you from your true self (in the same way Marx would argue it).
Critical theories "awaken" you to the fact that what passes as "neutrality" or "objectivity" or "common sense" are really just value-laden ideologies and "approved knowledge" that brainwashes you into accepting an unjust and oppressive status-quo.
Critical theories "awaken" you to the idea that you've been "atomized" and separated from your true social(ist) and collectivist nature by being convinced that their is a "Truth" out there.
For them, there is no "Truth" out there. What passes as truth is only what the dominant regime has decided is true through manufacturing knowledge and "regimes of truth" that support their claims and suppress others. It's Michel Foucault's "power knowledge," for those familiar.
To return to Kincheloe, "critical theory...is always concerned with the ways power operates and the way various institutions deploy power in the effort to survive, shape behavior and gain dominance over others."
Critical theories "awaken" you, granting you an "emancipatory source of authority" because you see how the world really works; you see what those in power have suppressed and hidden from you.
Marx Horkheimer, the guy who created Critical Theory, said Critical Theory is chiefly concerned with "emancipat[ing] human beings." Emancipating them from their "dogmatic slumber," as Kant put it.

Critical Theory is the "red pill" in the movie The Matrix.
Critical Theory isn't just critique. It's also normative, but in a backwards way. Horkheimer said that the ideal society (communist) couldn't be described from within the confines of the current society - the current society's terms make it impossible to envision alternatives.
But, he said, we can critique those aspects of society we wish to change. We can critique them endlessly as unjust and oppressive. We can tear away endlessly and eventually we'll reach our ideal society through subtraction.
So, the Woke have "awakened" to "the truth" about how the world really works and, guided by their "emancipatory source of authority" they critique everything as parts of unjust and oppressive "structures" and "systems" of power.
Now the constructivism comes in. It's too much to get into here, but people like Piaget and Vygotsky are clearly important.
Returning to Kincheloe, he says "Constructivism asserts that nothing represents a neutral perspective--nothing exists before consciousness shapes it into something perceptible."

This is a fundamental building block of the entire WOKE worldview. What does it mean?
It means that there is no objective way of viewing the world. None. It means that, as Kincheloe states, “No truly objective way of seeing exists…what appears as objective reality is merely what our mind constructs.”
So, whatever "reality" is, it's a construct of humans. Humans construct the world in our minds, but some humans enforce their constructs and values on the rest of us unjustly, hiding the power dynamics in things like "facts" and "truth."
Awakened to this, the Woke say what Kincheloe does: "Critical constructivism is a theoretically grounded form of world making."
"As critical constructivists remake and rename their world, they are constantly guided by their critical theoretical system of meaning, their emancipatory source of authority.”
So, Woke isn't just "critiquing things" or "noticing things." It's an entire "weltanschauung, a worldview that creates meaning on the nature of human existence."
So, to be Woke is to have "awakened" to "the truth" about how the world really works and, guided by an "emancipatory source of authority," leveling critiques against all that exists as parts of unjust and oppressive "structures" and "systems" of power.
To be Woke is to have "awakened" to "the truth" that you are a "world builder" that can "rename" and "remake" your world as a "social being" in solidarity with those that share your grievances.
It's not just "critiquing social power."

It's an entire worldview with an accompanying metaphysics, epistemology, politics, and ethics.
Real oppression exists. There are legitimate grievances. Critiques can be legitimate. But the Woke count on you thinking that's what's going on when in reality they are denying reality itself in favor of mysticism and magic.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Logan Lancing

Logan Lancing Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LoganLancing

Dec 18
How did we end up with these massive, unreadable omnibus bills in Congress?

Let’s break it down. 🧵 Image
Omnibus bills are huge legislative packages that combine unrelated provisions into one bill. They often span thousands of pages. Most members of Congress can't/don’t read them before voting.

Insane.
Congress wasn’t always this dysfunctional. For most of its history, it followed a system called "regular order." Each area of government was funded by a separate appropriations bill.
Read 14 tweets
Dec 9
This Woke Right conspiracy theory is a very compelling narrative based on a lot of truth that it distorts to its own purposes.

This is one of their central arguments, as I see it, presented without personal comment. Feedback welcome.

The “post-war liberal consensus."

🧵
After World War II, the Allies wanted to prevent another Nazi Germany situation. They wanted to combat the rise of one or more powerful and aggressive hyper religious, nationalistic, and ethnocentric nations.
So, they reached a consensus – “We’re not doing that again. Technology keeps advancing, and the next time might be our last.”
Read 23 tweets
Dec 8
Both the Woke Left and Woke Right destroy to build. The Woke Left aims to construct a communist future of "social justice." The Woke Right seeks to restore an idealized past of order and tradition, their own version of fascist "social justice."

They mirror:

🧵
The Woke Right targets the Woke Left, but its real enemy is Liberalism. The WR frame the WL as an extension of Liberalism. Liberalism, with its commitment to individual rights, constitutional governance, and universal principles, is their antagonist.
The Woke Left isn’t liberal. It explicitly critiques liberalism as inadequate, claiming it perpetuates systemic oppression. Liberal ideals like free speech, equality before the law, and individual liberty are dismissed as tools of the oppressive and unjust status quo.
Read 18 tweets
Dec 6
How Woke works in plain language.

1. Awaken to "the truth"
2. Claim Victimhood Status
3. Argue your insight is infallible because of your "positionality" within the power hierarchy
4. Demand/coerce your way to illegitimate power
5. Destroy anyone in your way
6. Utopia

🧵
1. Every woke movement begins with an "epiphany" that reveals how society really works. This truth is framed as hidden from the masses, accessible only to those who are enlightened or brave enough to see it.
Cult gurus lead their initiates to this "epiphany" over many interactions. Sometimes this process can take months, but because of the nature of the internet and social media, sometimes a new initiate can be turned in a few weeks, or even days.
Read 17 tweets
Dec 1
Some of the clearest evidence of communism’s failures comes from countries that split, with one side embracing free markets and the other falling to communism.

There are multiple examples: Germany, Korea, Vietnam, Yemen, and China/Taiwan.

Let’s look at the outcomes. 🧵 Image
Germany

After WWII, Germany split into East (communist) and West (market-oriented).

West Germany became an industrial powerhouse, with one of the highest standards of living in the world.

East Germany stagnated, with poverty, misery, and mass emigration.
In 1990, Germany reunified.

The economic disparity was shocking. East Germans earned less than half of what West Germans did.

Even decades later, former East Germany lags in productivity and wealth compared to the West.
Read 11 tweets
Nov 25
Tyranny is rarely imposed by brute force. It's often opt-in.

Let’s revisit the Tea Act of 1773 and the Boston Tea Party to see how tyranny disguised itself as “choice.”

🧵
The Tea Act didn’t impose new taxes but kept the existing tea tax from the Townshend Acts. It allowed the East India Company to sell directly to colonists, bypassing merchants. This made tea cheaper, but the real price was this: colonial consent to British taxation.
The Tea Act wasn’t about giving colonists a bargain. It was about control. The "cheap tea" came with strings attached: paying the tax on tea meant legitimizing Parliament's right to tax the colonies without their consent.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(