BREAKING: In a 5:01 a.m. Statement, Biden Announces Student Debt Cancellation for 55,000 Public Service Workers
President Joe Biden was up early today. In an early morning statement, he announced the cancellation of student debt for an additional 55,000 public service workers, raising the total number of individuals benefiting from his administration’s debt relief efforts to nearly 5 million.
The latest action provides relief to teachers, nurses, service members, law enforcement officials, and other public servants, fulfilling a key promise to make higher education a path to opportunity rather than a financial burden.
Biden wrote, “Today, my Administration is announcing student debt cancellation for another 55,000 public service workers, bringing the total number of individuals who have been approved for student debt relief under my Administration to nearly 5 million people through various actions. The public servants approved for debt cancellation today include teachers, nurses, service members, law enforcement officials, and other public service workers who have dedicated their lives to giving back to their communities and who are finally earning the relief they are entitled to under the law.
“Over the last four years, we have made significant progress for students and borrowers – including securing the largest increase to the maximum Pell Grant award in over a decade; holding institutions accountable for taking advantage of students; and fixing broken student loan programs such as Public Service Loan Forgiveness and Income Driven Repayment.
“From Day One of my Administration, I promised to make sure that higher education is a ticket to the middle class, not a barrier to opportunity. Because of our actions, millions of people across the country now have the breathing room to start businesses, save for retirement, and pursue life plans they had to put on hold because of the burden of student loan debt.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: DC Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde tells Trump and Vance: "The vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They pay taxes and are good neighbors. Our God teaches us that we are to be merciful to the stranger, for we were all once strangers in this land."
She said, ""Let me make one final plea, Mr. President. Millions have put their trust in you. And as you told the nation yesterday, you have felt the providential hand of a loving God. In the name of our God, I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now. There are gay, lesbian and transgender children in Democratic, Republican and independent families, some who fear for their lives and the people.
"The people who pick our crops and clean our office buildings, who labor in poultry farms and meatpacking plants, who wash the dishes after we eat in restaurants and work the night shifts in hospitals. They may not be citizens or have the proper documentation. But the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They pay taxes. They are good neighbors. They are faithful members of our churches and mosques, synagogues, wadara, and temples.
"I ask you to have mercy, Mr. President, on those in our communities whose children fear that their parents will be taken away and that you help those who are fleeing war zones and persecution in their own lands to find compassion and welcome here. Our God teaches us that we are to be merciful to the stranger, for we were all once strangers in this land."
NOTE: It's not just that the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals; the vast majority of criminals are people born here. Virtually all the mass shooters, rapists, and drug dealers were born here. There were hundreds of people shot in the past 72 hours, according to Gun Violence Archive, virtually all of them born here. On Dateline, which does documentaries on crimes—people killing their spouses, friends, burying them—virtually all the convicts are born and raised here.
If you are shot today, it will most likely be by someone born here. If there is a mass shooting at your child's school, it will most likely be by someone born and raised here—all while you deceive yourself into thinking the criminals, killers, and rapists were born elsewhere.
Also, when you travel across the United States, you meet many Indigenous people who believe their lands were stolen from them. The truth is, you can say you do not want new arrivals because it changes the society. Now that you are in charge of these lands and have imposed new laws, you decide who comes in and who does not. But hiding behind the argument of crime is just false.
It's just like drugs. If your child is sold drugs today and dies, it would have been sold by someone right here—not from China—it’s sold online. But you will still be online telling people, "Oh yeah, the criminals are coming from Venezuela and the Congo."
All false.
NOTE: Lands are acquired by force. The U.S. is not unique. Almost all countries acquire new lands with the gun, not the law. The law only comes later, once the gun has been used to take the land. Nothing is inherently legal; everything depends on who is in charge. The person in charge makes the law. The victor writes the law.
Look at Texas, California, Alaska, and virtually all other lands—it’s the same story. This also means that once you have forcefully acquired lands, you must protect them. If you do not, someone else will take them from you, and the cycle will continue.
In many counties and states, Indigenous people were even massacred after their lands were taken. It’s the same process—it’s been that way for ages. It’s not about the law, but the gun!
The U.S. is not the worst; there have been many empires, and the process has always been the same. The U.S. is less than 250 years old. In Alaska, I saw rocks that have existed for more than 11,000 years. It keeps changing. Some civilizations die, often through natural disasters. It has happened several times when about 75 percent of species perished.
If we all perish today, it won’t be because of Russia. It will most likely be due to a natural disaster, like if it gets too cold. The Ice Age is proof of that.
BREAKING - MAJOR CORRUPTION, THE GATEKEEPER SILENCING DISSENTING VOICES: Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan), Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, has just sent letters to various corporations, including Adidas, accusing them of colluding with the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) to control online speech, to silence dissenting voices, hiding behind 'brand safety' concerns.
NOTE: The Committee's oversight suggests that GARM, initially established to create a responsible digital environment, has allegedly used its market power to demonetize voices and viewpoints it disagrees with, beyond mere "brand safety" concerns.
NOTE: The letters request detailed information about the companies' roles and actions within GARM and emphasize the need to preserve all related documents and communications.
NOTE: The inquiry highlights specific instances of coordinated actions against conservative media outlets and questions the companies' stances on these activities. Responses are requested by August 15, 2024.
For those who do not know what the alliance does. Here they are. . They are the ones who will claim, for instance, that Twitter is unsafe for brands and advertisers because they would claim there is disinformation there when, in reality, it's only because @elonmusk is allowing free speech there, and conservatives, for instance, are allowed to speak. They do that to kill the company financially. There are other actors who scare advertisers for the same reasons. It's awful what's going on.wfanet.org/leadership/gar…
Here is how they define themselves: "The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) is a cross-industry initiative established in 2019 by the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) to help the industry address the challenge of illegal or harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetization via advertising.
"GARM was set up in the wake of the Christchurch Mosque shootings in which the killer livestreamed the attack on Facebook. This followed a slew of high-profile cases where brands’ advertisements appeared next to illegal or harmful content, such as child pornography and content promoting terrorism. This included the 2017 London Times exposé entitled “Big brands fund terror through online adverts.”
MADNESS. Investor @BillAckman who when went after Claudine Gay crazily claims family should be off-limits. This is the craziest thing that I have read today. For years, we've been talking about Hunter Biden and connecting his alleged corrupt business dealings to his father, President Joe Biden. Ackman's wife @NeriOxman is accused of multiple instances of plagiarism, receiving Jeffrey Epstein's gifts, and questionable relationships with other people, including an actor. I believe the guy should just chill and allow the facts to come out. The CIA calls it blowback. When you go after others rightly or wrongly, they will fight back. If the president's son is caught with cocaine, who do you think would be the focus? His son or the president?
Ackman wrote, "It has been the case since as far as I can remember in business and in media that family was off limits, unless of course the family is directly involved in the business.
"The code of the road was that you can attack the protagonist as much as you want, but not his wife and not his kids.
"The same is true in business dealings. You never go after someone’s family to get at a business person. This is a sacred code that I have never seen violated.
"Business Insider broke this sacred code on Thursday and again on Friday when they went after my wife, @NeriOxman. And they are working on another story about her. They are calling her former students as we speak."
Once you begin to or try to justify plagiarism or other stuff because the person is black, white, brown, or your wife, your husband, your child, and your sister, people would begin to question your own character. Remember, this is just the beginning, it may get worse!
Also, for those claiming you don't go after the wife. How many times have journalists gone after Melania? If they find something on her, like fraud, plagiarism, or anything else, won't they use it to damage Trump? Of course, they will.