Ash & Sarah Armstrong Profile picture
Dec 20 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Why I kept carbs high during my fat loss phase 🧵
Many people say that carbs increase insulin which leads to fat storage. Low carb diets keep insulin low, so you should get effortlessly get lean by avoiding carbs, right? No, an increase in insulin after your meals does not inhibit fat loss. This is a normal physiological response and does not necessarily mean fat loss is inhibited. 

You can still lose weight eating carbohydrates if in a calorie deficit. In fact, there are a number of benefits for including carbs during a fat loss phase…
1. Carbs help maintain precious muscle tissue. Keeping your glycogen stores replenished boosts your gym performance and helps your recovery. Full glycogen stores provide an anabolic (building-up) hormonal environment. Muscle glycogen depletion creates a catabolic (breaking-down) hormonal environment, which means more protein breakdown and less protein synthesis.

Carbs also help boost your gym performance so that you can push yourself and maintain adequate stimulus on your muscles for maintenance during your cut.

Muscle is precious tissue that you do NOT want to lose!
2. Carbohydrates support thyroid and metabolic health. The liver requires glucose to convert T4 to active thyroid hormone, T3, which plays a significant role in regulating metabolism. When T3 levels are low, the body's metabolic processes tend to slow down, which means that fewer calories are burned at rest, which can make fat loss more challenging.

When comparing isocaloric, low-calorie diets, those low in carbs reduce T3 levels, while diets that include carbs maintain T3 levels. (PMID 1249190)
3. Carbs are protein sparing. Meaning they supply the body the glucose it needs for vital functions. 

When you don’t consume carbs, your body will use some of your dietary protein and/or your muscle tissue to perform higher amounts of gluconeogenesis (turn protein into carbs) for your body to meet its baseline glucose needs. 

This also supports liver health since you are reducing one more thing the liver has to do (amongst its list of 500 tasks) – gluconeogenesis.
4. Including carbs means you will lose fat, not a bunch of water at the beginning of your cut. Each gram of glycogen (stored carbohydrate) is stored with about 3 grams of water.

As the body burns through your stored glycogen when you cut carbs, the body releases the associated water, leading to a quick drop in scale weight. However, this is primarily water loss, not fat loss.

By eating carbs, you ensure that your weight loss comes primarily from fat stores rather than this initial water weight. If low carb and eat in a calorie deficit for long enough, you will of course lose fat, but then the water weight will come back when you add carbs back in.
5. The inclusion of carbs often improves diet adherence and satisfaction. Carbs contribute to greater food variety, making meals more enjoyable and satisfying. This increased satisfaction improves long-term diet adherence, crucial for sustainable weight loss. Including carbs helps many avoid the restrict-binge cycle, as feeling less restricted in food choices makes it easier to stick to a diet plan over time.

The removal of carbs may help you initially lose weight (since you remove an entire food group, and thus a lot of calories). But, then what? How do you come out of that state? Can you maintain that day in and day out?
It is important to point out, however, that even if carbs are included during a diet, CHRONICALLY eating low calorie will lead to a Low Energy Availability (LEA) state, which is why it is important to plan out your (short term) fat loss phases, instead of chronically under eating.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ash & Sarah Armstrong

Ash & Sarah Armstrong Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @strong_sistas

Nov 30
In the 1940s, lean men maintained their physique while consuming approximately 3,500 calories daily—the same amount the average American consumes today. Yet, in stark contrast to the past, obesity rates have skyrocketed. Our metabolic rates have received a downgrade. ⤵️
Example - subjects in the Minnesota Starvation Experiment (1940s). The lean men aged 20-33, mean weight = 152.7 lbs, mean height = 5'10". Maintenance calories = 3500! (Again - the average calorie consumption in America today is ~3500-3600 calories per day, yet obesity is at an all time high).
The Minnesota Starvation Experiment was a very tightly controlled study, so their activity was closely monitored, and there were chefs that made ALL of their meals during the study, with weighed out portions. (Calories were controlled)

There weren't doing a ton of exercise, but remained active with daily steps. They walked 10,000-15,000 steps per day and performed one "cardio session" per week (30-min walk on a treadmill at 4.5 mph speed with a 10% incline). Along with 25 hours of classes at University and 15 hours of maintenance work (laundry, cleaning, clerical & statistical work).
Read 10 tweets
Nov 24
We are fatter than our ancestors, despite eating similar calories.

A thread🧵
Energy balance ⚖️ comparing calories consumed (IN) vs. calories burned (OUT)

You can't expect a body to maintain or lose weight when significantly more calories are consumed relative to one's metabolic needs.

And yes, there are some people who have significantly reduced their activity levels and increased their calories.

BUT according to some researchers, this calories in vs. calories out model just isn't enough to explain the current obesity epidemic.

There must be a reason for the large difference between calories in & calories out…
Dr. John Spearman is one of the leading metabolism and obesity researchers in the world. His lab has released a number of fascinating studies in the past year, including this one: 

“Total daily energy expenditure has declined over the past three decades due to declining basal expenditure, not reduced activity expenditure” PMID: 37100994

Yes, fat gain is the result of too many calories IN relative to the calories coming OUT.
 
But there is *a lot* more involved in the calories OUT side of the equation that is often discussed… what if there has been a MAJOR change in our metabolisms, impacting the calories OUT side of the equation?
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(