BREAKING: NSO Group liable for #Pegasus hacking of @WhatsApp users.
Big win for spyware victims.
Big loss for NSO.
Bad time to be a spyware company.
Landmark case. Huge implications. 1/ 🧵
2/ In 2019, 1,400 @WhatsApp users were targeted with #Pegasus.
WhatsApp did the right thing & sued NSO Group.
NSO has spent 5 years trying to claim that they are above the law.
And engaged in all sorts of maneuvering.
With this order, the music stopped and NSO is now without a chair.
3/ Today, the court decided that enough was enough with NSO's gambits & efforts to hide source code.
Judge Hamilton granted @WhatsApp's motion for summary judgement against the #Pegasus spyware maker.
The judge finds NSO's hacking violated the federal Computer Fraud & Abuse Act (#CFAA), California state anti-fraud law #CDFA, and was a breach of contract.
What happens next? The trial proceeds only on the issue of resolving damages stemming from NSO's hacking.
4/@WhatsApp suing NSO Group was a huge deal at the time.
We at @citizenlab & our peers in civil society had been investigating & surfacing a pile of #Pegasus abuses since 2016. Journalists, dissidents, truth-tellers, scientists, lawyers..
But nobody was taking action & NSO was flying high.
11/ Even as NSO has a bad time, other spyware companies like #Paragon present themselves as 'different' & 'approved' to try and break into the US market & grab market share.
I think their goal is to get enough contracts with countries like the US that it's hard to regulate them.
Be skeptical of their claims.
Seems like some are already falling apart.
They want to put secret hacking tools in the hands of American cops & police forces around the world.
You should demand oversight & action from Congress to stop this toxic industry from nesting in the US.
Today's ruling also raises questions about how legally safe it is for a company to sell & run hacking services targeting US-based platforms & their users.
WHOA: megapublisher @axelspringer is asking a German court to ban an ad-blocker.
Their claim that should make everyone nervous:
The HTML/ CSS code of websites are protected computer programs.
And influencing they are displayed (e.g by removing ads) violates copyright.
1/
2/ Preventing ad-blocking would be a huge blow to German cybersecurity and privacy.
There are critical security & privacy reasons to influence how a websites code gets displayed.
Like stripping out dangerous code & malvertising.
Or blocking unwanted trackers.
This is why most governments do it on their systems.
3/Defining HTML/CSS as a protected computer program will quickly lead to absurdities touching every corner of the internet.
Just think of the potential infringements:
-Screen readers for the blind
-'Dark mode' bowser extensions
-Displaying snippets of code in a university class
-Inspecting & modifying code in your own browser
-Website translators
3/ What still gives me chills is how many cases surfaced of people killed by cartels... or their family members... getting targeted with Pegasus spyware.
The #PegasusProject found even more potential cases in Mexico.