1/n A new wat to stack sats... without spending a dime.
2/n I want to tell you about a company I advise: @anadroenergy.
They install solar systems--panels, inverters, batteries--on rooftops in California.
Here's some of their work:
@anadroenergy 3/n Solar installers in CA haven't been doing so well lately. Utilities complained that there's too much home solar coming into the grid. They lobbied to cut "net metering," and won.
@anadroenergy 4/n So the economics of home solar in CA isn't great... at least not without something that could use, and pay for, excess electricity. Something flexible and scalable, portable, on-site. Something like... bitcoin mining.
5/n @anadroenergy doesn't just install solar systems on rooftops. They install and operate bitcoin miners at each residence too.
They over-provision the rooftop with up to 3x what the homeowner typically uses and mine bitcoin with the excess.
@anadroenergy 6/n The founders--@dhruv and @chase--aren't just running a solar company. They're also bitcoiners. @dhruv was a core dev. This is @chase 👇.
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase 7/n What these residential mining installs look like varies. It may be a custom indoor unit or an @upstreamdatainc black box. But it's quiet and out of the way.
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc 8/n By over-provisioning the solar, @anadroenergy solves a major issue: right-sizing for the future.
As homes electrify, adding EVs, heat pumps, and induction stoves, they use a lot more electricity.
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc 9/n But it's expensive to size up an existing solar system. Better to build it larger in the first place!
The problem is that building too big is an excess cost up front with no use for the excess electricity before the homeowner can use it.
The economics don't work.
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc 10/n By mining bitcoin on site, that waste energy is monetized: @Bquittem's pioneer species in real life.
Well and good. How does that translate to YOU stacking sats for free?
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc @Bquittem 11/n If you have a qualifying home in CA, @anadroenergy will install a solar system for you, complete with backup batteries, as well as bitcoin miners, for free. You pay nothing for this.
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc @Bquittem 12/n But you do pay them for the electricity you use that's generated by your own roof. They charge you the lowest utility electrical rate.
You also receive 80% of the bitcoin mined by the machines at your home with your own power. They take the other 20% of the bitcoin.
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc @Bquittem 13/n So that's the deal. Lend us your roof space and a space for a box of miners, and you can stack sats for free.
(If you're in California.)
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc @Bquittem 14/n I love the idea that you can decentralize hashrate and energy at the same time... without selling your stack.
For those of you who've followed me and @resistancemoney from the beginning, this is a great case of mining your values. coindesk.com/markets/2021/0…
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc @Bquittem @resistancemoney 15/n I can vouch for the professionalism and integrity of the founders. Dhruv and Chase are both experienced founders.
They're not energy people dabbling in bitcoin.
They're bitcoiners who saw possibilities for energy.
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc @Bquittem @resistancemoney 16/n @anadroenergy is small, but fast-growing. It's not just an idea. They're executing on it.
Already, they've completed installs in 36 homes and have a waiting list.
@anadroenergy @dhruv @Chase @upstreamdatainc @Bquittem @resistancemoney 17/n Hope you enjoyed the 🧵and can forgive my typos.
1/n I'm really proud of this report on bitcoin ownership.
Our survey of 3,538 adults in the US found bitcoin ownership:
-covers the full spectrum of political identity
-is skewed young and male
-correlates weakly with a unique profile of moral values
-correlates strongly with knowledge of bitcoin
🧵
2/n We wanted to understand who owns bitcoin and who doesn't, and why. That called for research. Not just surface-level demographics, but a deep look into the roots of our psycho-social identities.
Many frameworks claim to do this, but my research partner, @andrewwperkins chose "moral foundations" and designed a comprehensive series of questions.
We then we employed a professional firm to help us achieve a representative sample.
3/n As every bitcoiner knows, true randomness is hard to come by, but we think even visually you can see that we did pretty well along several dimensions in achieving something fairly representative. And it's a large n, 3,538 people.
@BrianConsolvo @KPMG Some highlights. On the environmental impact side, after clarifying that bitcoin has no scope 1 emissions, like EVS, and comparing bitcoin's energy use to other industries--minor, but not nothing--the report outlines 4 strategies for carbon reduction...
@BrianConsolvo @KPMG 1. Use of renewables--highlighting the drive to cheaper energy and mining's improvement of renewable energy generation financing 2. Demand response--citing Brad Jones 3. Re-use of waste heat--citing @MintGreenHQ 4. Methane reduction--citing @Vespene_Energy and @CrusoeEnergy
When public officials tell us the banking system is “sound and resilient” or “sound and stable” or “safe and sound,” all while banks are failing, one after another… it’s not just that we dismiss everything they say about banking. We realize that institutions lie to us.
That means our behavior is harder to manipulate via lying to us.
So then leaders are stuck with the choice of telling the scary truth and sparking panic or telling an ineffective lie.
They must still choose to lie, but because it’s ineffective, it’s quickly falsified.
The feedback loop creates an epistemic spiral of mistrust. Eventually we reach a point where no one believes the lie at all, and in fact “don’t panic, we’re ok” becomes, essentially, a signal to panic,
How to patch over this problem? You can mess with fungibility. Go back to our scenario. When did these 10 purchasers of power set up shop? Maybe the first 9 were running data centers, just using hydro, and then an aluminum smelter came along and they had to fire up the gas.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Educational 🧵on carbon accounting. If you want to learn about attributional vs marginal accounting, start here.
Resources linked after a brief explanation.
Attributional accounting takes the total emissions from a system and assigns proportions of it to participants in that system.
Marginal accounting tries to determine how marginal additions to load change the emissions in a system over what it would have been without that load.
If you're in a grid that is 90% hydro-powered, but where marginal demand is met by gas, then on the attributional system, when you run your vacuum cleaner, you calculate your footprint using as assumed 90% hydro and 10% gas mix.