isabelle 🪐 Profile picture
Dec 21, 2024 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
My photo kissing a nuclear waste cask went viral and people had… opinions about it.

There was outrage, with many claiming it was dangerous and that I was hurting my future children (lol).

Here’s why kissing a nuclear waste cask is actually fine🧵
The waste people are concerned about and say remains dangerously radioactive forever is called “spent fuel.”

Contrary to popular belief, spent fuel doesn’t look like neon green slime. I know, shocker.

It looks exactly like the fuel that goes into the reactor in the first place:

Just a bunch of ceramic pellets, lined up inside very long metal rods that are bundled together.Image
Image
When fresh fuel goes into a reactor, it stays there for about 18 to 20 months making electricity.

After that, it becomes less efficient and needs to be replaced.

That’s when it becomes spent fuel.

The problem is that spent fuel is super radioactive and hot. We can’t just toss it anywhere, it needs to be managed safely.

So, what do we do with it?
The first step is to move it from the reactor into a pool called a… wait for it… spent fuel pool.

It’s just like a normal, but very deep, pool and every nuclear power plant has one.

The spent fuel stays in there for at least 5 years, cooling down.
On top of cooling the spent fuel down, the water in the pool is also great at blocking radiation.

So much so that if you fell in it, but stayed close to the surface, you’d be totally fine.

You’d need to swim very close to the spent fuel itself to get a dangerous dose of radiation.Image
🚨Side note: please don’t try to jump in a spent fuel pool. You’ll get arrested.

This is just to show that even at its most radioactive stage, it’s very easy to protect people from spent fuel.
After years chilling in the pool, spent fuel is ready for its next stage.

That’s when it’s moved into big concrete and steel canisters called dry casks. Image
Image
Dry casks are so safe that you can kiss one without being concerned about getting a meaningful dose of radiation.

That’s because thick slabs of concrete can block even the most radioactive stuff. Image
But I didn’t just blindly trust that the dry cask was blocking radiation from the spent fuel.

When visiting a dry cask storage, you have to wear a dosimeter, a little device that tracks how much radiation you’re getting.

After walking between casks and literally kissing one several times, I got a dose of 0.8 millirem or 4/10 of a dental X-ray. Insignificant.Image
Lots of people worry about what happens to these casks in case of, let’s say, an earthquake.

The truth is that they’ve been tested for pretty much *anything*, including having a train slam against one, and they survived every time.

Check it out.
So, yeah, turns out the fear people have about nuclear waste comes from cartoons or straight up misinformation.

In reality, spent fuel should be the gold standard for waste management.

It’s the only industry that knows exactly where every ounce of waste is, and it stays safely contained.

Try saying that about any other type of waste.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with isabelle 🪐

isabelle 🪐 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @isabelleboemeke

Jul 2
There is a narrative out there that we shouldn’t care about higher emissions because because plants love CO2.

Well, firstly, we’re not plants.

Secondly, the reason we should care about more CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere is because it’ll be bad for modern human civilization 🧵
Higher CO2 levels trap heat and push global temperatures higher at a rate societies struggle to handle.

Historically, CO2 has varied, like 1,000 to 2,000 ppm in the Eocene 50 million years ago, with temps ten to fifteen degrees Celsius above today's.

That made Earth ice-free, with seas one hundred meters higher. There were no humans back then.

In the Pliocene, 3 to 5 million years ago, CO2 was closer to today's 420 ppm, with temps two to three degrees warmer, still flooding coasts. Still no humans.
Humans evolved when CO2 was 200 to 280 ppm, with stable climates ideal for agriculture and settlement.

Is there a "right" temperature for Earth? Not really, Earth doesn’t care. But we do, because modern civilization relies on stability!

Even a two-degree rise could shift crop zones, intensify storms, and drive mass migration.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 28
If Iran didn't have a nuclear electricity program, it might have gotten the bombs already.

Let me explain 🧵
To build a civilian nuclear electricity program, a country must work with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and sign a safeguards agreement. 

Without it, they can’t buy the specialized technology needed, like centrifuges or reactors.

It's not like you can buy this stuff on Amazon or EBay, and the companies that sell it will only do so if the country has signed the agreement.
The safeguards agreement allows the IAEA to monitor nuclear facilities closely, ensuring no shady activities take place. 

This makes it much harder to divert materials from a civilian program to a secret weapons project.
Read 8 tweets
May 23
President Trump signed four (!) executive orders to make the U.S. the world’s leader in nuclear electricity.

Some of it is promising. Some of it might backfire. Let’s break it down.

Nuclear Executive Orders megathread ☢️
Starting with the juiciest EO of them all: Reforming the NRC!

If you’ve been in pro-tech spaces on X, you’ve heard that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is to blame for nuclear’s abysmal performance in America in the past 30+ years.

“Since 1978, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has authorized only five new reactors, and of these, only two have been built,” reads the EO.
Ignore the fact that the NRC has actually licensed 14 new reactors since 1978, though only 4 began construction and a measly 2 finished.

The truth is that the aftermath of the oil shock in the 1970’s had a lot to do with reactor’s orders disappearing:

- Interest rates were super high. 

- Load growth slowed down a lot.

- Productivity at construction sites went down (partly because after Three Mile Island regulations were changing in real time.) 

To learn more about this, pre-order my book Rad Future. Yes, this is a shameless book plug.

But whatever, I’m not here to defend the NRC.
Read 16 tweets
Dec 27, 2024
I don’t have any hot takes on the immigration controversy, but felt inspired to share my story.

Some of my most vivid childhood memories in Brazil are of watching American movies after getting home from school.

They were light movies like Bethoven, Paulie or Babe.

In hindsight there were a lot of talking animals.Image
Image
Image
I loved the United States of America even then, before my developing brain could understand why.

Life simply appeared to be a lot better in America and everyone seemed happier.

I mean… people had air conditioning, laundry machines, dishwashers and TALKING PETS, how could they not be happier?!
For years I dreamt of moving to the US, as a deep part of my soul always knew it was my true home.

The opportunity finally presented itself when I was 18 years old and a modeling agency based in Miami invited me to spend a couple of months working there.

That was my chance and I jumped right on it.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 1, 2022
how it started how it’s going
two years ago i called big pro-nuclear organizations to ask what they were doing to save diablo canyon. the responses were the same: “don’t waste your time, it’s a done deal.”

guess i’m a terrible listener, because i kept digging…
until i came across @ParisOrtizWines from @StandUp4Nuclear and @energybants. we started a weekly call with @Heather_mom4nuk and @kristinzaitz from @moms4nuclear who had been relentlessly working on saving diablo canyon since 2016.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 31, 2022
TODAY IS THE DAY!

california legislature will decide on the future of diablo canyon. it’s obvious that keeping it open is the right thing to do to keep the lights on, reduce emissions and ensure california remains a climate leader. #SB846 Image
one objection to keeping it open was what people called a “solar tax”. the issue was fully cleared yesterday and the rooftop solar industry has removed its opposition to it. win win 🏆 Image
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE EARTHQUAKES?

don’t listen to me, listen to this expert of 50 (!) years in earthquake engineering and earthquake risk management:

sfchronicle.com/opinion/openfo… Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(