isabelle 🪐 Profile picture
Dec 21 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
My photo kissing a nuclear waste cask went viral and people had… opinions about it.

There was outrage, with many claiming it was dangerous and that I was hurting my future children (lol).

Here’s why kissing a nuclear waste cask is actually fine🧵
The waste people are concerned about and say remains dangerously radioactive forever is called “spent fuel.”

Contrary to popular belief, spent fuel doesn’t look like neon green slime. I know, shocker.

It looks exactly like the fuel that goes into the reactor in the first place:

Just a bunch of ceramic pellets, lined up inside very long metal rods that are bundled together.Image
Image
When fresh fuel goes into a reactor, it stays there for about 18 to 20 months making electricity.

After that, it becomes less efficient and needs to be replaced.

That’s when it becomes spent fuel.

The problem is that spent fuel is super radioactive and hot. We can’t just toss it anywhere, it needs to be managed safely.

So, what do we do with it?
The first step is to move it from the reactor into a pool called a… wait for it… spent fuel pool.

It’s just like a normal, but very deep, pool and every nuclear power plant has one.

The spent fuel stays in there for at least 5 years, cooling down.
On top of cooling the spent fuel down, the water in the pool is also great at blocking radiation.

So much so that if you fell in it, but stayed close to the surface, you’d be totally fine.

You’d need to swim very close to the spent fuel itself to get a dangerous dose of radiation.Image
🚨Side note: please don’t try to jump in a spent fuel pool. You’ll get arrested.

This is just to show that even at its most radioactive stage, it’s very easy to protect people from spent fuel.
After years chilling in the pool, spent fuel is ready for its next stage.

That’s when it’s moved into big concrete and steel canisters called dry casks. Image
Image
Dry casks are so safe that you can kiss one without being concerned about getting a meaningful dose of radiation.

That’s because thick slabs of concrete can block even the most radioactive stuff. Image
But I didn’t just blindly trust that the dry cask was blocking radiation from the spent fuel.

When visiting a dry cask storage, you have to wear a dosimeter, a little device that tracks how much radiation you’re getting.

After walking between casks and literally kissing one several times, I got a dose of 0.8 millirem or 4/10 of a dental X-ray. Insignificant.Image
Lots of people worry about what happens to these casks in case of, let’s say, an earthquake.

The truth is that they’ve been tested for pretty much *anything*, including having a train slam against one, and they survived every time.

Check it out.
So, yeah, turns out the fear people have about nuclear waste comes from cartoons or straight up misinformation.

In reality, spent fuel should be the gold standard for waste management.

It’s the only industry that knows exactly where every ounce of waste is, and it stays safely contained.

Try saying that about any other type of waste.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with isabelle 🪐

isabelle 🪐 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @isabelleboemeke

Sep 1, 2022
how it started how it’s going
two years ago i called big pro-nuclear organizations to ask what they were doing to save diablo canyon. the responses were the same: “don’t waste your time, it’s a done deal.”

guess i’m a terrible listener, because i kept digging…
until i came across @ParisOrtizWines from @StandUp4Nuclear and @energybants. we started a weekly call with @Heather_mom4nuk and @kristinzaitz from @moms4nuclear who had been relentlessly working on saving diablo canyon since 2016.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 31, 2022
TODAY IS THE DAY!

california legislature will decide on the future of diablo canyon. it’s obvious that keeping it open is the right thing to do to keep the lights on, reduce emissions and ensure california remains a climate leader. #SB846 Image
one objection to keeping it open was what people called a “solar tax”. the issue was fully cleared yesterday and the rooftop solar industry has removed its opposition to it. win win 🏆 Image
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE EARTHQUAKES?

don’t listen to me, listen to this expert of 50 (!) years in earthquake engineering and earthquake risk management:

sfchronicle.com/opinion/openfo… Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 9, 2022
CHERNOBYL UPDATE:

there’s been loss of some power at the chernobyl nuclear site. but how dangerous is that? by the year 2,000 all of the reactors at chernobyl power plant were shut down. so the risk of a core meltdown is ZERO
what about the risk of spent fuel in cooling pools? when the uranium pellets come out of the reactors, they still produce heat for years. that’s why they need to stay in a pool and be cooled down. they produce less and less heat as time goes by, reducing the need for cooling.
in most cases this fuel is cool enough to be transferred to dry casks (example below) after 5 years. the spent fuel in chernobyl has been chilling for over 20 years.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 4, 2022
#Zaporizhzhya thread:

it is the biggest nuclear power plant in europe (6 reactors)

3 reactors were offline already

2 more were recently shut down

there seems to be 1 reactor still operating
a couple of hours ago, russian military attacked the plant and caused a fire in an administration building. the reactor buildings were not on fire and seem to be safe.
contrary to what some people are claiming, even in the worst case scenario, this would NOT be an event 10x worse than chernobyl. or even just as bad as chernobyl.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 5, 2021
“what do we want?
clean energy!
when do we want it?
now!”

extra entrance to the @savecleanenergy rally!

@Heather_mom4nuk @kristinzaitz @ParisOrtizWines @NuclearQuaffle @MadisonSchroder
diablo canyon is california’s largest single source of clean energy.

lots of people showed up to say “don’t shut it down!”
we heard from Dawn @OrtizLegg district 3 supervisor!

she recommended the parties involved in the closure revisit this decision and to be curious.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 8, 2021
📣 DIABLO CANYON @MIT and @Stanford WEBINAR TLDW:

the webinar started with former secretary of energy steven chu saying “what are you doing you silly bunch? keep diablo canyon open!”
just kidding! he actually said that countries that turned off their nuclear *cough cough germany* have built more fossil fuel plants and increased their carbon emissions.

just so we’re all on the same page: burning more fossil fuels = bad
steve then urged @PGE4Me to reconsider their decision to close down diablo canyon… like a true king 👑
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(