EBL Profile picture
Dec 22 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
To solve Arsenal's 'attacking problems', Mikel Arteta has implemented a new tactical shape.

Let's review it.

A thread 👇 Image
Arsenal's new shape has been coined the 3-diamond-3.

Instead of a fullback inverting into the pivot, the emphasis lies on Ødegaard to connect the defence and attack together as he drops from high to low.

His movements trigger others to occupy different lanes in the front 5. Image
We can see an example of that here.

Ødegaard drops to create a situational double pivot which is the cue for Arsenal's forwards to occupy the 5 lanes in attack.

Who occupies where is where the fluidity comes in.

Jesus/Havertz + Lewis-Skelly/Trossard interchanged roles a lot. Image
Ødegaard's dropping movements from high to low are particularly difficult to stop because Arsenal often use their #9 to occupy the ball-side centre back (who's role is often to press Ødegaard).

For example, on the far-side, Trossard is tracked by the centre back in the pocket. Image
Image
Alternatively, for Ødegaard, Jesus occupies the centre half which allows Øde to drop freely outside the lines and overload the opposition's press.

And, off the back of receiving in these moments, he can receive face forwards on his left foot into a front 5.

Hugely threatening.. Image
Image
The plus side of Arteta's new system is that Arsenal can attack in more unpredictable ways with their fluidity between the lines and Ødegaard receiving in midfield areas with the ball on his left foot, the whole pitch ahead of him, and 5 ahead of him despite dropping low.
The negative aspect of the system comes in the defensive transition moment, though..

Although Ødegaard's dropping movements can create a 3-2 base which is an ideal occupation of spaces for the 'defence behind the attack', he doesn't always do it in traditional central areas.
So, as described, Ødegaard drops outside the lines as opposed to centrally into the block.

He can & does drop centrally into the block, but he primarily drops outside the shape.

As a consequence of that, Arsenal still largely only have 1 player in deep midfield for transitions.
Partey could not manage the spaces either side of him in transition as a result of that and Palace had quite a bit of success on the turnover.

Where this will look better for Arsenal is when Declan Rice comes into the #6.

It is in these moments where the balance will be good.
Declan Rice has the mobility, running power, size, and temperament of the best pure defensive midfielder in the world, and that's because that is exactly what he is.

Alright, he will be asked to defend a little too much space on occasion, but the trade off makes total sense.
Arsenal directly improve their attack and become even more dynamic and difficult to stop whilst having the best pure defensive midfielder in the world ready to stifle counter-attacks alongside some of the most reliable & mobile defenders alive.

System = top solution from Arteta.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with EBL

EBL Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EBL2017

Dec 18
I have been critical of the 3-1-6 in the past because of the volume of players that can become congested between the lines, the over-reliance on fluidity within it that harms positional play, & the vulnerability of it in transition.

But Enzo Maresca uses it very intelligently 👇Image
Pochettino and Potter tried to use the 3-1-6 at Chelsea but it didn't work.

Why?

Because they tried to do it with an overlapping fullback, unlike Maresca with two natural wingers. The balance is better with the fullback inside.

Maresca's build-up & press is also much superior.
Maresca's 3-1-6 in the attacking moment is relatively similar to ten Hag's at United, and when United did sustain pressure under him their creative qualities were typically quite good.

But they struggled to sustain pressure.

It goes back to the build-up and the press again...
Read 7 tweets
Dec 17
If we’re talking pure quality and attributes alone, elite clubs looking to sign Rashford makes complete sense.

But we’re not just talking quality and attributes.

If that was the case Amorim and Manchester United wouldn’t want to get rid of him..

We’re talking about his desire.
If Manchester United haven’t been able to get him to work as hard as possible for as long as he has been there, then how could Pep, Slot, Arteta, Maresca, Ange, or whoever the hell else do it?!

These guys have the same beliefs as Amorim.

Work with 100% intensity. No exceptions.
I hope Rashford realises he has all of the attributes to be an elite player and screws his head on for the remainder of his career & decides to work with 100% commitment & intensity.

He can win teams titles as he is unstoppable. He could be *that guy* for Arsenal (for example).
Read 6 tweets
Dec 7
To prevent wingbacks receiving in 1v1 situations on the flank with regularity, Amorim would be smart to consistently use a dynamic where the wingback inverts into the half space between the lines which allows the inside forward to hold full width.

Harder to mark + solves issues.
Look at Chelsea as an example.

Gusto inverts between the lines and it allows the double pivot to remain in tact and the winger to hold the width as opposed to someone like Rashford or Garnacho playing inside the game when it doesn't suit them.

Same shape but better balance. Image
Amorim's United attack in a 3-2-5, just like Chelsea & other top teams often do.

But the way they get into that phase is a lot easier to manage because of how rigid it is.

The lack of fluidity with positional rotations is an issue with a defender on the wing & a winger inside..
Read 4 tweets
Dec 5
Ruben Amorim's current game model is flawed.

Mikel Arteta's game model is, and always has been, elite.

This is one of the most poignant threads I have ever written...

A tactical breakdown of Arsenal vs Manchester United 👇 Image
Amorim wants his centre backs to step out and press players dropping between the lines, but:

Situation #1) De Ligt doesn't want to jump. Rice is found.

Situation #2) Maguire doesn't want to jump. Havertz is found.

Situation #3) Mazraoui doesn't want to jump. Ødegaard is found. Image
Image
Image
What's the issue here?

Why aren't United's centre halves jumping to press Arsenal's players between the lines?

Let's look at Arsenal's build-up and United's high press.

First, it's important to acknowledge that Arsenal build in a variety of shapes and United defend in a 5-2-3.
Read 35 tweets
Dec 2
Thinking about the Arsenal-United game.

Can't help but worry for Amorim's team.

Good lucking building out from the back under the lights at The Emirates with your middle centre back facing his own goal at the edge of or IN his own box with little width ahead of that in attack.. Image
Arsenal are unlikely to go man-to-man at all times, either, & that presents itself as an opportunity for United, but I'm not sure Arsenal need to when considering the context of the game, their physicality & United's lack of technical quality.

Use a +1 deeper to manage Rashford. Image
United could get some success when they do form their 3-2-5 attacking shape if Arsenal are passive in the 4-4-2 because they can build some attacks here.

And if Arsenal jump without a centre back jumping between the lines they can overload Rice.

But how often will they be here? Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 1
Arsenal destroyed West Ham.

Julen Lopetegui's man-oriented mid-block was consistently exploited by Mikel Arteta's tactical acumen.

De Zerbi used the same defensive approach at the end of last season & lost 3-0.

We saw similar methods of exploitation in both games..

THREAD! 🚨Image
Here we see Soler, Paqueta, and Souček marking Arsenal midfield 3.

That man-to-man defensive approach opens up passing lanes into the frontline because there is no zonal defender screening the defensive line.

That makes West Ham vulnerable to 'up-back-and-through' patterns. Image
An example of that can be seen in the aftermath of the above situation.

Arsenal circulate out to the far-side and Calafiori makes a run from deep.

Typically, a #6 who defends zonally will track this half space run, and Souček tries to, but it's too late as he was marking Rice.. Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(