Prez Profile picture
Dec 26 23 tweets 10 min read Read on X
This new Chinese jet has really thrown people for a loop. A lot are pushing this as a “6th Gen Fighter” b/c it shares a lot of vague commonalities with the NGAD artistic depictions. I don’t believe this to be the case, but there’s still a lot to be inferred from the pics so far— Image
Let’s talk shape since it’s what has blown people away the most. The tailless, compound delta wing design is extremely reminiscent of NGAD depictions. Do they fulfill the same role? Idk, I’m not on either design team. But this is still a clear indication of intent— Image
Image
The compound delta suggests a very strong intent to produce a very high speed, long range platform. Tons of lift provided for cruising, and the high sweep angles promote very high top speeds. I estimate a ~67 and ~55 deg swept wing. Much higher than your typical fighter—
For comparison, most fighters have between a 40 and 45 degree wing to allow for high speed and (very importantly) maneuverability. Even the mighty MiG-25 of Mach 3 fame had a ~42 deg wing. Another benefit arises from this extreme sweep angle. Improved stealth—
Famously, the F-117 has a ~67 deg swept wing! This suggests an intent to defeat low frequency search radars since they care less about angles than your typical X-band, but this also more thoroughly defeats medium freq like S & L bands. Very indicative of a penetration platform— Image
Image
We can further see the indication that this will be a high speed platform through the use of CARET inlets (a la F-22). Notably less stealthy than the DSI inlets of the F-35/J-20, but removes the inlet spiked cowl decreasing parasitic drag during supersonic flight— Image
Image
Image
Talking control surfaces is important here since this is the first piloted, tailless design we’ve seen from China. First note is simply the insane amount of control surfaces that make up the trailing edge of this plane. I count at least 10 independently moveable surfaces here— Image
Starting with the outermost surfaces, we have split rudders similar to, say, the B-2/21. This suggests a need for variable control based on flight profile. This furthers the high speed hypothesis as one large split rudder may be too much control, but required at low speed— Image
Image
Looking inward, we have 6 total elevons. Why so many? I’m really not sure. Again, perhaps an indication of need for a large continuous surface for low speed handling, but refined control for extremely high speed flight regimes. There’s another more important detail here tho—
Note the 6 actuator protrusions. Something seen on almost all stealth designs today. This suggests China is somewhat behind in actuator design as the F-35 notably omits these to improve stealth qualities on the wing and tail. So perhaps not as 6th gen as people think ;) — Image
Image
While we’re back here, let’s talk engines. The most fascinating thing is the triple engine design inferred from the sort of awkward top mounted DSI intake, and the noticeable middle bump between the more obvious twin engine exhausts. My initial thought was perhaps— Image
Image
A high efficiency medium or high bypass turbofan for long range. Now, I’m more inclined to believe it to be a ramjet. Top mounted intakes are not known for their high-AoA performance, so it leads to the thought of an engine that operates best in straight line flight conditions.—
All the other points made prior further bolster the “High Speed Hypothesis” and a possible ramjet would make sense for a large top mounted intake. Besides this, we can assume the 2 regular engines are of the WS-10 family which is proliferated on pretty much all PLA fighters.—
This is further inferred given the size of this aircraft. Notably much larger than the J-20, but still quite small for a bomber. This lends itself to being a tactical or even medium strategic strike platform similar, again, to the F-117.— Image
Furthermore, the large delta wing means ample space for fuel, and with it being larger than the J-20 at an advertized combat radius of 1200NM (2000km), this new platform may be capable of at least 2000NM. A necessity for operating in the vastness of the Pacific Orient.—
It’s hard to tell w/out front shots of this jet, but given its large, wide body, lack of an obvious bubble canopy and comparing it to the new twin seat J-20S, the new platform could be a side-by-side configuration a la F-111 or Su-34. Furthering itself as a strike platform.— Image
Image
This isn’t to say it can’t perform the air superiority role as we’ll see in a moment, but it just doesn’t make sense to push that capability out there when the J-20 and J-35 are very new designs while the PLAAF bomber and attacker fleets are aging into oblivion.—
Can it do A2A tho? The weapon bay configuration lends itself to the idea that it can use very large, long range missiles such as the PL-17 only really seen on the J-16. This also means the ability to carry large cruise missiles/PGM internally and still hold A2A for self-escort.— Image
Image
There’s no visible EOTS-esque system anywhere on the underside, so how does this thing do ground targeting? My theory is that it’s again a more strategic strike platform like the B-2/21. There aren’t any noticeable serrations on the nose to infer a typical forward looking array—
However, there are noticeable discolored side panels to suggest more side looking arrays in a similar configuration to the B-2. This would provide extremely capable SAR mapping and air-to-surface target designation capabilities before target approach. Image
Image
Image
I’d assume some sort of forward looking array to be installed, but it’s hard to tell at this moment. There’s also those very obvious glass windows forward of the discolored panels. Perhaps a side looking infrared system? Maybe just extra pilot visibility :P Image
Image
A final bit is the main landing gear for this beast. Doubled up gear means this thing is HEAVY. Furthering the hypothesis of a strike platform, and if correct, we can expect MTOWs of up to and over 100k lbs (45k kg)! This really puts it into a whole other category.— Image
Image
This is all completely speculative hearsay tho, so just stay open-minded. It’ll be very interesting to see what comes of it, and what its true capabilities are. Anyways, thank you very much for reading, and if I missed anything that you may have noticed please let me know :D

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prez

Prez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PrezGHz

Nov 18
When people talk about stealth aircraft performing air combat, it’s often stuck in the mindset of 4th Gen fights or simply fighting an inferior enemy. People love to taut on about how great stealth is, but always fail to think about what happens when the enemy is also stealthy. Image
For ex., people that don’t know much outside of Wikipedia articles will tell you things like thrust vectoring don’t matter when “le AIM-120D has 100 mile range!”. This of course doesn’t account for even the slightest bit of EW denying shots at that range let alone against stealth Image
Stealth, first and foremost, denies detection+tracking at range. This allows it to penetrate airspace a non-stealth craft would instantly explode in. By the time you get a solid weapons grade track on a stealth craft, he’d certainly be in range so 100NM AMRAAM(tm) doesn’t matter Image
Read 15 tweets
Oct 26
I think there is a very interesting doctrinal contrast to be made with Soviet vs US air superiority missions and how that lead to the ultimate design of the systems within the aircraft, not simply the airframes themselves. Let's contrast the Su-27 and F-15 of the 80s.-- Image
Now, my interest in this was renewed by a casual, tangential convo with @Combination_K earlier today on this very subject. The Su-27 and F-15 are often times seen as practically identical in purpose from the outside: large, long-range, high endurance air-superiority fighters.--
The primary topic of this talk was the radars. That being the APG-63 and the N001 radars. Both are large, modern PD-mech radars. However, their employment was very different which is where doctrine can be seen as the primary director of ultimate design. Where the USAF/USANG-- Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 3
The year is 202X. Through the fog of war, thickened by electronic warfare, you’ve accidentally merged w/ the enemy. It’s a clean head-on just like the movies. As you pass, the only question you ask yourself is: one circle or two? ITT: dogfighting in the age of the HOBS missile. Image
But what’s a HOBS missile? HOBS = High Off Boresight. Meaning the missile is able to launch at a target far off the direction of the launching aircraft’s nose. Now, this technology isn’t brand new. As far back as the AIM-9D(1965), the ability to shoot HOBS was made. Image
At the time, this was only 25 degrees. The AIM-9E’s Sidewinder Extended Acquisition Mode (SEAM) allowed the ability to acquire the lock off boresight as well! The AIM-9L/M enhanced this angle up to 40 degrees allowing pilots to give the missile extra lead for better hit chance. Image
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(