As a historian, more than any other director, I trust Eggers to capture the "vibes" of a historical setting, even a fantasy one like this.
From the standpoint of capturing the 1830s in Germany, this film is great.
🧵 1/25
It's a remake of the original, and I'm not really going to get into the plot or spoilers that much, but rather evaluate the setting in 1830s "Germany" and Transylvania. 2/25
Although I am an 18th Century Historian, my advisor (tragically, departed) Katherine B. Aaslestad studied the principal setting of the film: the coastal trading cities (Hansestädte) of North Germany in the early 1800s. 3/25
There are some beautiful shots of the city (fictional: Wisborg, a stand-in for Wismar?) that would have delighted her. They look like they were pulled directly from the art of the period. I loved this part of the movie. 4/25
Long story short, the husband (Nicholas Hoult) of the young woman being haunted by the vampire is sent, unknown to him, to the Count Orlok (the Vampire)'s castle in Transylvania, to finalize purchase papers. 5/25
Man, let me just tell you, early 19th century men's overcoats are basically their own character in this film. Particularly Willem Dafoe's. 6/25
Husband gets to the castle, and meets Count Orlok. Refreshingly, he isn't a black-clad bald figure, but instead looks like he came straight out of Bethlen Gabor's Transylvanian army in the 1580s-1610s. I really loved this. Linda Muir knocked it out of the park. 7/25
Very refreshing to see the fashions of early modern eastern Europe treated so well. The fashions of the time and place of vampiric origin stories are well-represented in Orlok's wardrobe. 8/25
Orlok signing the contract to supposedly purchase property in Wisborg is one of the most interesting scenes in the film with early modern German culture and language on display: a nice black and white drawing "Ansicht von Schloss Grunberg" is prominently shown. 9/25
Much of the paperwork in this scene is written in Kurrentschrift, an obscure and annoying early modern German script that I spent years of my life deciphering in graduate school! So exciting! 10/25
Also, I was relatively pleased with the use of linguistic markers to show that despite everyone speaking with a British accent, the film was actually set in the German Confederation. "Meine" "Herr" and "Frau" are used, but no-one speaks in a cheesy accent. 11/25
Well, obviously, since the main character Ellen (Lily-Rose Deep) inadvertently made a love-contract with Count Orlok, he slowly works his way to Wisborg and hijinks ensue. As Ellen's symptoms worsen, a series of friend and doctors turn to: 12/25
Willem Dafoe, playing Professor Albin Eberhart von Franz. He's the van Helsing analogue. Dafoe really steals the show. Like, really. My main man has some absolutely incredible lines. Such as: 13/25
"I have seen things in this world that would have made Isaac Newton crawl back into his mother's womb!" (this is the only line that got an audible laugh at my showing, btw) 14/25
"We have not been so enlightened as we have been BLINDED by the gaseous light of SCIENCE!" 15/25
"I have wrestled with the devil as Jacob wrestled with the Angel, and I tell you that if we are to tame darkness we must first face that it exists!" 16/25
His slightly more antiquated fashions (I seem to recall him in a banyan and cap during the first meeting, I can't find any photos of that tho) match well with a man who would have been born in the 1770s. 17/25
Dafoe's stubble and refusal to wear middle-class black clothing help mark him out as one of the insane. Just an incredible performance, delivering a lot of nonsense lines, but working with Ellen (Lily-Rose Depp) to save the day. 18/25
Ralph Ineson (another of Eggers' standard actors) delivers a solid performance as a former medical student of Dafoe's von Franz. 19/25
The film is an interesting addition to vampire lore: a traditional peasant staking occurs, of the sort that I've written about on here before in the 1720s. 20/25
The film is fairly explicit in turning the traditional narrative of vampirism on its head: we don't have vampires anymore because the enlightenment made people discard folk tales. Instead, the peasants, wise women, and nuns in Transylvania are the characters most prepared. 21/25
In the "modern" German Confederation, science has made the people vulnerable to the vampiric influence, since they don't believe in the supernatural, a sentiment directly stated by von Franz, and referenced by Count Orlok ("I can't wait to live in your modern city") 22/25
Crosses, Garlic, stakes, fire, and the sun are all used, to effect or no, by both the traditional Transylvanian peasants and the more modern Germans. The Transylvanian village and countryside is amazing, icons, cloisters, and shrines mark this as a different world. 23/25
There are some Christmas references, including a music box that plays Stille Nacht (silent night) which was 20 years old when the movie was set. 24/25
Eggers & Co. have knocked this one out of the park. It isn't a history movie, but it is a movie set in a concrete historical time.
There only so many movies where I exclaim: "say, that's a nice brig!" 5/5 stakes.
I missed the 250th of this in July, enjoy it now before 1775/2025 rolls on.
John Adams, July 6th, 1775:
"A few Minutes past, a curious Phenomenon appeared at the Door of our Congress: A german Hussar, a veteran in the Wars in Germany, in his Uniform, and on Horse back."
1/5
A forlorn Cap upon his Head, with a Streamer waiving from it half down to his Waistband, with a Deaths Head painted in Front a beautifull Hussar Cloak ornamented with Lace and Fringe and Cord of Gold, a scarlet Waist coat under it, with shining yellow metal Buttons 2/5
a Light Gun strung over his shoulder—and a Turkish Sabre, much Superiour to an high Land broad sword, very large and excellently fortifyed by his side—Holsters and Pistols upon his Horse. In short the most warlike and formidable Figure, I ever saw. 3/5
Barry Lyndon, Stanley Kubrick's eighteenth-century epic, premiered fifty years ago this week (December 11).
In celebration, I am doing a watchthrough thread on the film. I'll link my previous threads on Barry Lyndon below.
Here we go.
1/many
People complain that this movie is slow but six minutes in Redmond Barry's (Ryan O'Neal) dad has been killed a gunfight and he has been seduced by his cousin (stay classy, eighteenth-century Ireland). 2/
Alright and we are already onto the first military scene, which let's be honest, is why you are reading this thread.
I have lingering questions about the maneuvering going on here: supposedly it is a company, but they have two colours. 3/
Tonight on Ken Burns's American Revolution, Rick Atkinson is going is going to tell you:
"Muskets are mostly inaccurate beyond 80 yards...so a lot of the killing is done with the bayonet... this is really eyeball to eyeball."
The trouble is, this just isn't true. 🧵1/16
First of all, I don't really want to talk about accurate musket range.
Firefights actually occurred over 120 yards, but that isn't the point of the thread. You can see a chart below of descriptions of 25 firefight ranges in the Revolutionary War.
2/16
I want to talk about Atkinson's claim that fighting "a lot of the killing is done with a bayonet" and that the fighting was "eyeball to eyeball...it's very intimate." 3/16
With Halloween upon us, did you know: Vampires turn 300 this year?
This year, 2025, marks the 300th anniversary of vampires haunting public imagination in Europe.
Read on for the origins of Orloc, Dracula, and of course, Nandor.
1/25
In the 1720s folktales of supernatural events combined with the tensions of a military borderland to create a new type of spook: The Vampire.
Vampires, and the responses of locals and governments to the threat of their presence, would in the imagination like wildfire.
2/25
Our story begins in the aftermath of Prinz Eugene of Savoy's victory at Belgrade in 1717. After this victory and the resulting Treaty of Passarowitz, the Austrian government now ruled part of Serbia and northern Bosnia: it had to control a porous borderland with refugees. 3/25
The usual narrative of the early American War of Independence is that the British, with their superior army and navy, went ham on the Americans, who only started winning when they gained foreign support and became better soldiers after 1777.
It's actually the opposite. 🧵
1/11
In the first year of the war, it was the British who struggled to gain ground as American forces scored victory after victory.
Just look at the record:
2/11
April 19th, 1775: Lexington and Concord
American Victory
May 10th, 1775: Capture of Fort Ticonderoga
American Victory
June 17th, 1775: Bunker Hill:
Costly British Victory
Sept-Nov, 1775: Fort St. Jean:
American Victory
Dec. 9th, 1775: Great Bridge
American Victory
3/11
What were battles in the Revolutionary War really like? It's a subject that, as a history professor, I have spent my life studying. I teach (among other things) the military history of the Revolutionary War at a small college in Ohio.
2/14
Soldiers in this period wore colored uniforms, not so that they could be picked off by their opponents, but so they could be identified when massive clouds of smoke obscured the battlefield, making it hard to see anything but enemy muzzle flashes.
3/14