🧵🇮🇳 Excerpts from an absolutely brutal analysis of India and its people from an Indian expat:
"India is a veritable hellhole. [...] This has significant implications for the West, because immigrants keep pouring in."
Justice in India 🇮🇳:
"India operates on two fuels: corruption and connection."
"There's no concept of pride and honor in that society."
Taking responsibility in India 🇮🇳:
"I have never witnessed a situtation in India where someone in authority took the initiative to address a problem he was responsible for."
"Indian authorities would do absolutely nothing [...] unless there's a material reward involved."
Truth in India 🇮🇳:
"People lie openly. Everyone knows everyone lies, but everyone lies anyway."
A dystopian society 🇮🇳:
"I cannot imagine what about India that is not dystopian."
Fake respect in India🇮🇳:
"Respect is another concept that is alien to Indians."
"They will demean you the moment you are in a weaker position."
Import the 3rd world, become the 3rd world🇮🇳:
"This situation of calmness, peace, lack of noise, lack of smell in the air leads to an existential crisis and a compulsive need to recreate India wherever they move to."
Western values incomprehensible for Indians 🇮🇳:
"The concepts like fairness, justice, trust, empathy and impartiality are completely alien concepts to the Indian mind."
"They cannot differentiate between right and wrong."
"It is an amoral, irrational society devoid of values. Any values you try to instill will slip off like water off a duck's back."
Education in India 🇮🇳:
"The focus is on obtaining certificates, putting on Western clothes, and they think that is all that matters. The skills behind those certificates is completely immaterial to their minds."
"Their micro-compromises in a complex society may be untraceable, but result in horrible outcomes."
No hope for change 🇮🇳:
"They cannot think beyond sex and money. But this should be expected. [...] This is what happens with a society with an IQ of 77. Low IQ people cannot hold values in their psyche."
"There's nothing you can do about this except to understand how immigration from India and the rest of the 3rd world will impact the West."
Full talk with various anecdotes by @JayantBhandari5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Big "You can just do things" moment in the US as a court order is ignored to deport illegals.
Rule of law bros are shocked.
In this thread I'll explain why they are wrong and the judicial terror from activist judges must be broken 🧵👇🏻
2/ First, let’s make one thing perfectly clear: As boring as it sounds – the rule of law is good and an important foundation for functioning societies.
HOWEVER: when it comes to immigration, the other side, which always insists on the rule of law, is ignoring it all the time. It is unfortunately a fight that cannot be won if we play by the rules set by our enemies.
3/ Nothing about mass-immigration is in accordance with the rule of law. The decision to leave borders unguarded and let millions just walk (or swim) in is not “rule of law” – it’s ignorance of the law.
The extension of the right of asylum – something meant to protect political activists fleeing a dictatorship – to war refugees, economic migrants and even “climate refugees” is not “rule of law”. The plantation of foreigners against the expressed will of the people into the heart of our societies is not “rule of law”.
🧵1/12 FOUNDATIONS
Europe has been woken up from its comatose sleep into which the Pax Americana put it. It’s a rude awakening. Many are now scrambling to hastily get Europe back to self-sufficiency as it’s coming off life support.
More unity, more defense, a European army are common rallying cries. All of these are no doubt necessary. But do we have the necessary foundations to support them?
2/12 Europe has its work cut out for it:
- Re-establishing defence capable of keeping RU & US imperialism at bay
- Reshoring industry for critical imported goods
- Dealing with a massive immigration crisis
- Fixing a dire demographic situation
To fix all of these, gigantic efforts will be necessary. None can be accomplished by merely adjusting a few policy knobs. It will put significant strain on every European citizen. Everyone will feel the effects. We have years if not decades of hardship ahead of us.
3/12 This is where we must talk about foundations. What are the things that will motivate Europeans to exert themselves in such a manner? Why fight for Europe? Many might say the answer is obvious, and it absolutely should be! But evidently it isn’t. Those leading the charge at the moment say it’s to protect “our values”. Let’s have a closer look at that.
🧵Another banger video by @uberboyo on the coming reshaping of world order. It inspired me to write a thread that is sure to upset some people here.
For us, the important question is “Will Europe be able to assert itself? Will we overcome our paralysis and rise again?”
Currently, Europeans are demoralized and cucked, that is the brutal analysis at the end of the video. We have lost our self-confidence. Even most of those resisting the downward spiral imposed on us by liberalism lack the will to something greater, to glory. They are content with becoming a minor, irrelevant nation in a multipolar world, as long as they get to be left alone (which is an illusion, because you never get to be left alone when you’re weak.)
This is not a new state for Europe to be in. In fact, it can be seen as a continuation of a disaster that first began a century ago. After WW1, Europe was already demoralized and had lost much of its former power over the world.
The Germans tried to break out of this by means of revolution and conquest, but ultimately failed and in doing so condemned Europe to an even greater loss of geopolitical power.
Before this second disaster had happened, the now infamous Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi was pondering the future fate of Europe and the world not unlike Uberboyo. Fun fact: he was a Nietzschean, too.
His assessment of the state of Europe in the interwar period can be applied to Europe today without having to change a single word, which is quite remarkable.
In Pan-Europa (1924) he writes:
🧵What explains this reckless behavior?
European decision makers are geopolitics-deniers. They simply don't believe in it. What they do believe in is the end-of-history narrative. Power politics is inconceivable for them.
Instead, they interpret world-events according to a good/evil dichotomy. Advancing towards end-of-history = good. Reality deviating from this dreamland = evil. And with the conviction of a religious fanatic they engage in self-sacrificial acts to fight reality.
At the same time, the coming of the end-of-history is taken for granted, an inevitable prophecy. Therefore, symbolic acts against evil-doers suffice, like a banishing spell. Engaging in geopolitics even to stop evil-doers would be heresy.
"The EU will never be right wing!"
"You can't take over power in the EU"
"It's all a fantasy!"
And now look where we are.
It might come as a surprise to many people, but the EU is indeed a democratic institution - or at least as democratic as the average European nation, whether or not that's a good form of democracy is another question. It's just that most people vote for anti-European parties.
Or at least they used to. The tide is turning now: many countries have swung right in national elections, which changes the balance of power in the European Council. A RW majority in the EU parliament is within reach. You must go vote in the EU elections summer 2024!
🧵One point of contention that kept coming up in response to my thread on #remigration was the economic fallout that an uncompromising approach would entail. While I personally think being poorer is outweighed manifold by the immaterial good of a homogeneous society, this isn't..
as obvious to many others.
First, let's review the economic consequences of remigration. Hidden in this graph, which compounds millions of people from different ethnicities is the fact, that, while non-Western immigrants are net-negative on average, within this group are above-
average individuals and above-average ethnicities that contribute to our wealth.
Deporting everyone indiscriminately would on paper increase our overall available finances. However, the sudden shock to the system would no doubt be so severe that we would see a strong reduction in