Post

More from @chalavyishmael

Yehuda Teitelbaum

@chalavyishmael

Dec 25, 2025

You don’t care about Palestine.

How do I know?

One Word. Sudan.

CNN has just published a detailed, months-long investigation documenting ethnically targeted mass killings carried out by Sudan’s army and its allied militias. The reporting describes civilians being executed, bodies dumped into canals, and mass graves concealed until satellite imagery revealed wrapped corpses surfacing as the water receded. Investigators traced responsibility back to senior levels of command.

The scale is absolutely staggering. More than 150,000 civilians are believed to have been killed. Nearly 12 million people have been displaced. Entire regions are facing famine. Non-Arab communities have been targeted at checkpoints, driven from their villages, and in some cases wiped out entirely. Women interviewed by investigators described watching their children executed. Weeks later, bodies were still being carried downstream by the canals. A UN investigator quoted by CNN described the campaign as a “targeted extermination of people.”

If concern for civilian life were really the driving force behind today’s activism, Sudan would be impossible to ignore. Yet there are no campus encampments demanding action, no mass ceasefire marches, no viral influencer monologues, and no celebrities posting flags or slogans.

The usual explanation is that Israel is different because the United States supports it militarily, and that protests are really about American complicity rather than the tragedy itself. I don’t buy it. If mass killing only matters when it can be blamed on your own country, that is a deeply self-centered way of engaging with human suffering.

These same voices regularly insist that silence is complicity and that there is always something one must do, even when the odds of success are low. That principle is suddenly abandoned when Sudan comes up.

No one genuinely believes that protesting Israel under a Trump administration is likely to change Israeli policy. People protest anyway because they believe public expression itself has moral value. That logic does not disappear because the victims are Sudanese, yet it is treated as if it does.

There is also a tendency to pretend that the United States is simply powerless in Sudan, which is not true. This is not an argument for American troops on the ground, and it is reasonable to oppose that idea. But the United States is the most powerful military and diplomatic actor on the planet. If it wanted to exert serious pressure, coordinate large-scale evacuations, isolate leadership, enforce consequences, or push negotiations using the full weight of its influence, it could. Even short of military action, there are many tools available.

The reality is not that nothing can be done. It is that no one wants to do anything. Sudan does not offer the emotional payoff or political symbolism that Israel does. It does not fit neatly into Western ideological narratives, and it does not allow people to perform virtue without cost.

Sudan has everything people claim to care about: ethnic cleansing, mass graves, famine, millions of refugees, and overwhelming evidence documented by satellite imagery, whistleblowers, and international investigators. Even CNN could not soften what it found.

And still, there is silence.

That silence says far more than the slogans ever did. Your outrage is not humanitarian. It is selective, ideological, and narrowly focused on one country, while far worse atrocities are treated as background noise.

You don’t care about Palestine.

You care only about the tragedy you can blame on the Jews.

You can read this article on my Substack here:

chalavyishmael.com/p/you-dont-car…

Here is the CNN investigation.

Be warned, it's quite graphic.

cnn.com/interactive/20…

Read 4 tweets

Yehuda Teitelbaum

@chalavyishmael

Nov 12, 2025

🚨 BREAKING: Qatar’s official Foreign Ministry spokesman, Majed Al-Ansari, once wrote that the air-raid sirens in Tel Aviv filled him with optimism and that Jews are "thirsty for blood."

Al-Ansari represents Qatar in the media as a “moderate diplomat.”

He's anything but. 🧵
1/

In 2014, during the Israel/Hamas war, Al-Ansari published an article in a Qatari government paper, praising Hamas and describing Israelis hiding from rockets as a “source of optimism.”

2/

On Gaza:

"Indeed, its enemies among its Arab neighbors seem even more thirsty for its blood than the Jews."

/3

Read 9 tweets

Yehuda Teitelbaum

@chalavyishmael

Oct 28, 2025

🚨 EXPLOSIVE: A new investigation has uncovered that Mahmood Mamdani, Columbia professor and father of NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, sits on the advisory council of the Gaza Tribunal alongside Ramy Abdu, a designated Hamas operative.

The tribunal’s recent Istanbul conference featured terror-linked speakers, including Sami Al-Arian (convicted of aiding Palestinian Islamic Jihad), Raji Sourani (former PFLP member who met Hamas leaders), and Sahar Francis, whose NGO was designated by the U.S. Treasury as a PFLP affiliate.

The Gaza Tribunal, which claims to be a human rights initiative, includes multiple former UN officials and Western academics who shared a stage with individuals tied to Hamas and other U.S.-designated terror groups.

Abdu, who sits next to Mamdani on the advisory council, is documented as having close family ties to senior Hamas operatives and once appeared in photos with Hamas leaders Ismail Haniyeh and Muhammad al-Jamassi.

This means the father of a New York mayoral candidate was advising an organization run by and featuring known terrorists, Hamas affiliates, and UN insiders.

How many more of these networks are quietly operating in Western academic and political spaces while hiding behind “human rights” rhetoric?

Will any reporter bother to ask Zohran about this?

I doubt it.

Anything to say @ZohranKMamdani?

🔗 to the full investigation below 👇

"Ramy Abdu, who sits alongside Mahmood Mamdani on the Gaza Tribunal’s advisory council, serves as chairman of EuroMed, a Geneva-based NGO. Abdu has admitted to having close family ties to Hamas operatives."

Full investigation:
jewishonliner.org/p/mahmoodmamda…

Here's a longer thread on Ramy Abdu and Euromed by @EFischberger:

https://x.com/EFischberger/status/1749534831489466710?t=o-TLmLpQmX3WyoXeFYOZNw&s=19

Read 12 tweets

Yehuda Teitelbaum

@chalavyishmael

Oct 27, 2025

🚨 BREAKING: Former Qatar World Cup media manager Abdullah Ibhais just exposed Qatar’s entire World Cup propaganda system.

At Play the Game 2025, Ibhais revealed that Qatar’s Supreme Committee secretly profiled journalists worldwide, tracking their social media, labeling them as friendly or problematic, and sharing those profiles with government agencies to control international coverage of the 2022 World Cup.

He said Qatar’s media strategy revolved around three words: deflect, discredit, and deny. Journalists who cooperated were rewarded with access and exclusives. Those who criticized Qatar were cut off. When that failed, the regime bypassed the press entirely and delivered its message directly to diplomats, parliaments, and football federations.

Ibhais knows this system from the inside. As the committee’s media manager, he was jailed in 2019 after refusing to cover up Qatar’s abuse of migrant workers and criticizing the regime’s handling of a labor protest. He spent years in prison on fabricated charges before being released earlier this year.

The World Cup, he said, was never just about sports. It was a $300 billion campaign to rewrite Qatar’s image while silencing dissent.

Why are “journalists” like Tucker Carlson so intent on defending this terror-funding Islamic dictatorship located thousands of miles away from the United States?

And if this is how Qatar operated during the World Cup, imagine what they’re doing now.

Watch the full talk here:

"He was accused of bribery, misuse of state funds, and leaking confidential information related to a tender process. Ibhais denied all charges, but nevertheless, he was found guilty of them in April 2021 at a Doha criminal court..."

Full article:
playthegame.org/news/abdullah-…

According to Freedom House, Qatar scored 25 out of 100 on their freedom scale and is classified as "Not Free".

https://x.com/chalavyishmael/status/1783587163159834745?t=s1S-INh5WhMf-xRr_hj3lQ&s=19

Read 6 tweets

Yehuda Teitelbaum

@chalavyishmael

Oct 20, 2025

🚨 BREAKING: An ISIS-linked outlet tied to a Dearborn, Michigan preacher released a video celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk as “praiseworthy” and “justified by Sharia.”

The video says Kirk “deserved death” and that Muslims should “rejoice and thank Allah."

1/ 🧵

The outlet behind the video is called Project Guiding Light, a media arm affiliated with Ahmad Musa Jibril, a pro-ISIS cleric based in Dearborn, Michigan.

Jibril has been one of the most influential radical preachers in the West, inspiring jihadists for over a decade.
2/

In the 39-minute video, PGL praises the murder of Charlie Kirk as a “praiseworthy action.”

It declares that “the one who insults the Messenger deserves death, according to the Shari’ah.”

They call Kirk “this dog” and say Muslims should “be rejoicing and thanking Allah.”
3/

Read 13 tweets

Yehuda Teitelbaum

@chalavyishmael

Oct 3, 2025

I gave @megynkelly the benefit of the doubt until now.

No longer. These are all ridiculous arguments.

Saying Israel should stop the war because the scale of destruction is “too large” is naive and misleading. Wars are fought to achieve specific goals, not to minimize damage on a whim. If your position is that the war should end, explain how Israel can end it while guaranteeing that Hamas will not remain in power and while ensuring all hostages are returned.

Claiming “enough destruction” without offering a credible plan for preventing another October 7th is intellectually dishonest. It ignores why Israel is fighting and it wilfully ignores the reality that Israel takes extraordinary steps to avoid civilian casualties while Hamas embeds fighters among civilians and uses them as human shields.

Nobody is arguing you are not allowed to have an opinion. This is America. Say what you want. But do not be surprised when people call you an antisemite for arguing that Israel should simply stop the war and leave a genocidal terrorist organization in place. That is exactly why commentators who push ceasefire-only positions without addressing the security consequences get labeled that way. If you support a ceasefire that leaves Hamas intact, you owe the public a rigorous explanation for why you think leaving a murderous, organized terror machine on Israel’s border is morally tolerable.

On Tucker Carlson, at least you are honest about your personal feelings. But stop pretending the issue is that he's merely “anti-Israel.” The problem is that Tucker has repeatedly lied, manipulated facts, and amplified the most despicable, vile voices on his show. Over the past year his output has been overwhelmingly obsessed with Israel, and much of it is demonstrably false. He has given platforms to fanatics, grifters, and conspiracy theorists while refusing to retract or correct proven errors. You claim to believe Tucker is not an antisemite, but millions of Jews sure do. You cannot call someone like that a trusted friend and expect no pushback.

As for Candace Owens, the “I don’t really know her” defense is absurd. How many people on your show do you talk about without "knowing them"? A quick read of her posts and commentary over the last year paints a clear picture. She has embraced lunatic conspiratorial, narratives and flirted with the worst kind of tribal scapegoating. Maybe it's time you "get to know her". Invoking motherhood or “pressure” as a shield against criticism is complete nonsense. Plenty of people are under pressure. They don't suddenly become Nazis.

You end this clip with an admission of pride. Fine. But understand what you're admitting and stop pretending to be an objective journalist. For most Jews, support for Israel is not a hobby or a foreign-policy preference. It is woven into the fabric of our safety and survival. When public figures normalize lies about Israel, when they imply Jews are disloyal or conspiratorial, when they let insinuation replace evidence, those positions have real, violent consequences.

So here’s the bottom line. If you cannot or will not condemn lies, denounce people who amplify hatred, and explain how your preferred policy actually secures peace and prevents future massacres, then you are complicit in the damage. Pride is one thing. Responsibility is another. Choose one.

I would love to see a response from you @megynkelly. Feel free to defend yourself. This is America after all. You have the right to criticize my opinions. As I have the right to criticize yours.