Brentford played with the most compact 4-4-2 low block you will see all season.
The problem with it against top teams is that there is no escape.
Want to play short passes to link before springing the counter attack? Arsenal will steal the ball back immediately.
This was the case for the first goal.
Brentford can easily end up in a 7-3 or 8-2 formation when the 4-4-2 lines are so compact.
Brentford won possession three times from this situation, but the short counter-pressing spaces that Arsenal have created gives no chance of a Brentford counter-attack
This leads to a Partey shot where Jesus follows in to score.
It's a goal Arsenal don't often score, creating in the chaos.
This is what controlling all four phases of the game looks like.
In possession ✅
Out of possession ✅
Attacking transition✅
DEFENSIVE TRANSITION ✅
And, of course, set pieces ✅
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Amorim’s 3-4-3 was tested last night against a well-coached Newcastle side that dismantled the structure in the first 30 minutes of the game.
Tactical thread 🧵(Rated 18 for Man United fans)
Animations of the systems and the related performance problems.
Amorim is a manager who wants his team to play on the front foot. We highlighted this during our analysis of Sporting Lisbon, which you find at the link below.
You can see this in the initial moments, and this is what we have come to expect from Amorim’s front players. Amad and Zirkzee join Hojlund to press high. Eriksen and Casemiro back them up.
The problem is that half the team is on the front foot. The other half is pinned. The wing-backs don’t jump. Both Newcastle full-backs are free.
If you want to press man-to-man, they will bypass the press. Low risk, high reward.
Tactically, the players recognise this. Here, Trent sees the opposite full-back, Spence, jump to press.
There's an easy pass to the goalkeeper to retain possession, but Trent knows LIverpool have equal numbers on the Spurs defensive line as Spence has jumped.
It turns out they have a better scenario.
Bissouma and Sarr leave Szoboszlai, and this turns the situation into a 4v3 in Liverpool's favour.
For all of the in-possession criticism of Russel Martin and Southampton, his out-of-possession tactics ultimately led to the result before his sacking.
Let's take a deeper look at Southampton's OOP tactics.
THREAD🧵
Southampton lined up with a 4-4-2 diamond.
With split strikers, Southampton looked to press high.
From the 1st minute, we see a problem.
Sulemana closes Forster down; the goalkeeper makes a simple link pass to get his centre back on the ball. Line one of the press is broke.
Spurs now have 4v3 on the midfield line with the familiar site of their full-backs inverting.
Sarr rotates with Spence and they combine as Maddison makes his move untracked off the back of the midfield line.
A tactical analysis of how to dominate against a 4-4-2 press.
A DETAILED THREAD on the current 4-4-2 pressing trend and the structure that Leeds used to exploit it.
Let's look at the default shape of Leeds and Middlesbrough.
Leeds started in a 4-2-3-1, which would shift into a 3-3-1-3 when in possession.
Middlesbrough started in a 4-2-3-1 and shifting into a 4-4-2 out of possession.
The shifts allowed Leeds to dominate.
A view of the Leeds shift in possession
- One midfielder drops into the defensive line
- Other midfielders play on same vertical line at different heights (creating a 1-1)
- Full-backs provide the width
- Wide forwards invert