Ever wonder who is funding the foreign policy experts quoted in media and testifying to Congress?
Introducing the Think Tank Funding Tracker.
This new database tracks donations flowing from Pentagon contractors, foreign governments, and the US government to the top 50 foreign policy think tanks in the US.
You can browse a think tank and see who funds them…
…or look at a specific donor and see where they are splashing their dollars.
So what did we find in compiling this database?
Defense companies, led by Northrop Grumman, contributed around $35 million to these think tanks in the last five years alone.
Foreign governments contributed even more, generously giving more than $110 million. The UAE, the UK, and Qatar are the top donor countries.
The US government contributed just under $1.5 billion in the past five years, most of which came from the Department of Defense.
Funding can lead to self censorship and sympathetic policy recommendations. At its worst, it could even lead to outright censorship. sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04017574/d…
Donors are aware of these benefits. Some think tanks even openly advertise the influence that corporations can buy through sponsorship programs.
Money talks, and Washington is long overdue for an uncomfortable conversation about the corporations and foreign governments funding its experts.
That conversation starts with dark money think tanks. Think tanks are not required to disclose their funding. Over a third of the top think tanks disclose *nothing* at all about their donors.
To encourage more transparency, we assigned a score to each think tank based on how much they disclose about their funding. They range from transparent and partially transparent think tanks like these ones to…
…think tanks that disclose nothing at all. Some of these dark money think tanks, such as @FDD and @washingtoninst testify to Congress all the time about foreign policy.
Above all, I would encourage folks to sift through the data to see what you can find. Check out the about page for more on methodology and download the data for yourself. This database will be updated every year as new annual reports come out. thinktankfundingtracker.org/think-tanks/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: The 14-18 influencers posting content on behalf of Israel must register as foreign agents and mark their content as sponsored by the Israeli government, FARA experts tell me
Other foreign agents note their content is sponsored by a foreign government on social media. For instance, here is former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who is very transparent about his work for Republica Srpska
This is known as a conspicuous statement. It's a standardized statement that lets social media users know who is sponsoring the content similar to what you would see with corporate sponsorship on social media
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu alluded to a cohort of Israel’s influencers last Friday. “We have to fight back. How do we fight back? Our influencers...they are very important.”
The Biden administration's Pentagon team has been moving to lucrative defense industry roles at breakneck speed. So where have they landed?
Let's take a quick stroll through the revolving door....🧵
1) Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin ---> Clarion Strategies
After declaring he had "no intent to be a lobbyist" during his confirmation hearing, Austin just founded a new strategic advisory firm
Austin's new firm is called "Clarion Strategies" which is a nod to its aim to help clients navigate "advancements in defense technology like AI and unmanned systems."
In other words, the new firm is very much hoping to court clients from the defense industry.