Update: I'm told the chart says "indictments for violence per 1000 inhabitants". One person could have more than one indictment hence maybe less than half are indicted.
More information here on migrants and crime in Norway.
How well did academia address the rape gang child sex slave issue?
From @knrd_z thread below, looks like: 1. Used scare quotes to imply it is a fake thing. 2. Insinuated Muslims are the real victims.
There should be an inquiry into anti-white racism in academia.
3. Feminists write a vast amount on "rape culture". But faced with a real gang rape and child sex slave culture, they were largely silent.
4. Appears to have been zero or near zero attempt to tell the stories of the survivors.
Huge fail of the vast apparatus of feminist and gender studies academia.
1520-1720 elite human capital became obsessed with religion (and likely high in religiosity) then 200 years later suddenly changed to be less religious.
As shown by density of the words God, Jesus, and Christ (vernacular and Latin) in books.
After 1720, elite human capital becomes much more interested in science (and probably more secular in outlook).
As shown by the prevalence in books of these words: medicine, astronomy, mathematics, geometry, philosophy, hypothesis, logic, experiment (vernacular and Latin)
What caused the post-1720 change?
Probably one man: the genius Newton.
A new generation of elite human capital recognized in his mathematical laws of nature something far more intellectually satisfying than theological doctrines and creeds.
The ideology has gone by various names such as
"Third Worldism"
"nonaligned movement"
"South-South solidarity"
"multipolarism"
"BRICS perspective"
From the 50s/60s beginning to now, the demands have been consistent:
-immediate decolonization (a disaster of violence and autocracy)
-huge and unconditional aid (would -> supercharged corruption and rent-seeking)
-non-interference (would -> free hand for internal repression)
2. Evo says the desire for ethnic affiliation keeps popping up throughout history. Ethnies rarely had their own states (nation-states) because of violent imperialism: small states either got smashed or (if victors) became the core ethnie of an bigger empire.
3. West European states from the middle ages were smallish and survived a long time in a polycentric system not smashed to pieces by huge empires. So, ethnie and state were congruent. This gave birth to modern nation-states.