Thread by @aboscage

the structure of music communities is spheres of friendship and experience either loosely connected to musical relationships (parasociality & influence) or tightly connected (direct influencers/producers of influence).

hierarchy within music communities are only categorized-

through status placed by other people. foucalt notes power as an essence that doesnt exist within any single power, but is mainly just the "reverberation" of influence within a chamber. to note single people as heads of influence would be ultimately objectively wrong.

the (mature) consciousness to come within ideology in music should be to be willingly selfish & establishing your intention and word beforehand. the ambiguity of irony or silence within privatized groups of status (their privatization influenced even more theough status)-

become places of unknowing power by having their words be loosely interpreted to fit across wide audiences while still holding a double intention of negativity (irony in morality always comes from negativity/ego). coexisting with ambiguity is the selfish need for ideology-

to become "pure" in community, meaning that our process of music has to be done by all under the influence; an authoritarian motive of ideology. ideology should exist as purely our own experience free of influence. if musics intention (or intention in ideology) was publicized

first and foremost, private sectors in music enforcing influence would deconstruct and therefore ideology would become just an experience of individual. an individual who creates music off their experience WILL create music as a representation of their passion of the-

environment, and an external motive will not exist if power does not exist. TLDR; music discourse is useless and if we all did what we wanted and separated a capitalistic desire from artistic motives we would be a lot happier.

@threadreaderapp unroll