The Trudeau govt has confirmed its Foreign Interference Commission Report will be published by the end of this month. I've reviewed some of the documents—here are my notes and some important themes you should be aware of.
1/ The Trudeau govt does not care.
Elections Canada identified "loopholes in leadership contests" as a serious concern. The decision to proceed with a leadership race without consideration for closing these loopholes shows the Trudeau Liberals just don't care about interference.
2/ The govt has done absolutely nothing about the issue.
Again, the recent decision to go ahead with a leadership race before submitting their final report on foreign interference shows a complete lack of political will to reduce or eliminate foreign interference.
3/ There are not one, but many, foreign interference threats.
Some of the most convincing documents I read were submitted largely by diaspora groups—Sikhs, Chinese expats, Russian expats, etc.. They reveal a multitudinous threat to Canada's democracy, sovereignty and security.
4/ There is disagreement on who represents the largest threat.
Chinese-Canadians identified the PRC as the biggest threat; Sikh-Canadians identified India; and so on. One thing is clear: the “post-national state” is being put to the test by a shrinking world—and it is failing.
5/ This isn't your mother's foreign interference.
Spies, bribery, intimidation, extortion and even murder. The Trudeau govt talks a big game about foreign interference and "protecting our democracy," but the issue has runaway on them and they're clearly powerless to stop it.
6/ There was almost no talk about U.S. foreign interference.
Interestingly, even amongst the "51st state" talk and a long history of American influence over Canadian politics, there was comparatively little talk in the documents about U.S. foreign interference.
7/ The commission seems less about protecting Canada's democracy, and more about protecting Trudeau.
Consider that most of the talk about U.S. foreign interference circulated around Trudeau and dispelling the Buffalo Chronicle story about his rumored "NDA" with a former student.
8/ The govt spent a fraction on Foreign Interference compared to the Convoy.
The cost for the Foreign Interference Commission, while in the millions, will surely pale in comparison to the hundreds of millions spent persecuting political prisoners and peaceful protestors.
9/ What was the point of all this?
The mandate of the Commission is to make recommendations on how to combat foreign interference. But how would a government in a state of prorogation even implement those recommendations? They can't. This Commission feels like a waste of time.
10/10 Foreign interference is a serious threat and this is a smokescreen.
Another addition to a legacy of wasted taxpayer dollars, this Commission offers a fitting mantle piece we can place next to the proverbial urn containing the ashes of Trudeau's disgraced political career.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Important questions arise over this problem: What do we do to fix it? And how much of North America's fentanyl problem is Canada's fault?
Trump's tariffs reignited the fentanyl conversation, so let's take a clear-eyed look at it:
1/ In Canada, the number is 21. That's the average deaths per day of fentanyl overdoses. In the United States, the number rises to over 200. This isn’t a small problem, it's a big problem. And if we’re going to tackle the problem, we need to look at it honestly and unemotionally.
2/ This is an emotional issue, after all. People are dying. And politicians, as they will, are politicizing the deaths. Canadians have a right to be angry. Americans have a right to be angry. But are “Canadians killing Americans”? Absolutely not.
The @JCCFCanada challenge to prorogation hearing in the federal court taught me a lot more about Section 3 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms—and I think that Section is relevant when it comes to the possibility of Mark Carney potentially becoming the Prime Minister of Canada.
Section 3 says: "Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein."
By legal definition alone, there is no requirement for the Prime Minister to be an MP, but by convention—not to mention for practical and political reasons—any PM is expected to win a seat very promptly.
Even better, of course, they should already be a Member of Parliament!
UPDATE: Someone has allegedly "pulled the fire alarm" during our lunch break at the Supreme Court/Federal Court of Appeals building where Trudeau's prorogation of Parliament is being legally challenged.
We're back from the fire alarm incident.
The JCCF lawyer replies to the Trudeau government lawyer's claim that the judge and he discussed Trudeau potentially acting in "bad faith," arguing that "in bad faith" is equivalent to acting against the principles of good government and outside the scope of his executive power.
HAPPENING NOW: After a short delay and a bit of a last minute change of location, court is in session for the challenge to the Trudeau government's prorogation of Parliament.
I ran into @NorthrnPrspectv along the way, who is sitting next to me in the Court of Appeals.
The government lawyers are asking for a one day extension, until Feb. 18, 2025, to write submission replies to the interveners. Chief Justice Crampton doesn't look thrilled.
"A 🧵 I Wrote on the Legal Challenge to Prorogation on an Airplane to Ottawa"
1/ Justin Trudeau’s Jan. 6, 2025 “resignation speech” at Rideau Cottage went the way of Sophie Grégoire-Trudeau—it took off and blew away, like flaming flying pinecones in the wind.
2/ Remarkably, even as the PM’s notes scattered into the snow, he stayed on message: announcing his intention to resign and to prorogue Parliament ahead of a Liberal leadership race.
3/ During the Prime Minister’s press conference, he relied on two reasons for the decision: first to “reset” Parliament based on his opinion that it has been “paralyzed for months”; and second, to permit the Liberal Party “time to select a new party leader."