THREAD: Both UK PM Keir Starmer and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan are members of the Fabian Society, a British socialist organisation founded in 1884, with the goal of installing socialism through gradual, imperceptible increments, rather than revolutionary overthrow.
The Fabian Society is infamous for its support and promotion of eugenics in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
🧵1/7
In the Spring 2024 edition of the Fabian Society's quarterly magazine, Fabian Review, Sadiq Khan wrote:
"I joined the Fabian Society 30 years ago because its values reflected my own. As mayor, those values have been the foundation on which I have governed."
"Let us make this [140 year] anniversary year one to remember – with City Hall, a host of Whitehall departments and 10 Downing Street all occupied by Fabians."
🧵2/7
Sure enough, 10 Downing Street is now occupied by fellow Fabian and leader of the British Labour Party, Keir Starmer.
Writing in the same edition of Fabian Review, Starmer boasted about the Labour Party's determination "to achieve the long-term change desperately needed to transform the lives of working people."
"I hope and know that the Fabians will be alongside us again in our mission for a decade of national renewal."
🧵3/7
The Fabian Society takes its name from Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, a Roman general renowned for his strategy of slow, gradual victory in warfare.
Fabius famously resisted the superior Carthaginian army under Hannibal by avoiding pitched, climactic battles. Instead, he employed a methodical approach of persistence, harassment and wearing the enemy down over time.
This philosophy of gradualism is echoed in the Fabian Society's first pamphlet:
"For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did most patiently when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays; but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain, and fruitless."
🧵4/7
As explained by author Jon Perdue: "The logo of the Fabian Society, a tortoise, represented the group's predilection for a slow, imperceptible transition to socialism, while its coat of arms, a 'wolf in sheep's clothing', represented its preferred methodology for achieving its goal."
🧵5/7
Several prominent members of the Fabian Society in the late 19th and early 20th centuries—including playwright George Bernard Shaw, writer H. G. Wells, and Sidney and Beatrice Webb, who were both instrumental in founding the Labour Party—expressed support for eugenics, a pseudoscientific ideology that sought to improve the genetic quality of a human population by encouraging the reproduction of individuals deemed "desirable", whilst reducing or preventing reproduction among those considered "undesirable".
Eugenics has historically been used to justify depopulation and population control measures, often under the guise of improving societal well-being or addressing perceived social, economic, or environmental challenges.
These efforts were typically framed as "scientific" approaches to managing population growth or enhancing the "quality" of the population, and included forced sterilisations, marriage restrictions, and other forms of social engineering.
🧵6/7
Infamous Fabian and eugenicist George Bernard Shaw:
"There are an extraordinary number of people whom I want to kill."
"You must all know half a dozen people at least, who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth. And I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board, just as he might come before the income tax commissioners... and say, Sir or Madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence?"
"If you can't justify your existence, if you're not pulling your weight in the social boat, if you're not producing as much as you consume, or perhaps a little more, then clearly we cannot use the big organisation of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us."
🧵7/7
H/t: @JoeWolverton2JD
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Britain we once knew is slipping away before our eyes. What started as whispers in dystopian novels has become front-page headlines. Every adult in the UK will soon be expected to carry a government-issued digital ID card. Not by choice. By law.
THREAD 🧵
They're calling it the "Brit card". How perfectly British to give such a soft label to something so sinister.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer will announce the plan today. No referendum. No say for the average Brit. Hardly surprising, really—who at Number 10 would dare ask the people? Because any sane person would reject outright handing yet more power to a hall of bureaucrats, surrendering liberty for a litany of promises.
The official story may sound reasonable at face value. Combat illegal immigration. Make it easier to verify work eligibility. Protect the borders. But scratch beneath these surface-level excuses and a different picture emerges. This card won't exist in isolation. It'll be connected to everything. Jobs. Homes. NHS records. National Insurance numbers. Even driving licences. All bundled into one "convenient" app that the government controls completely.
Think about what that entails. Every transaction monitored. Every movement tracked. Every interaction recorded. They'll know where you work, where you live, when you travel. They'll know if you're buying medicine, booking holidays, or simply trying to rent a flat.
And no, this isn't mere speculation—the plan is to create a centralised digital ID that becomes the key to accessing essential aspects of daily life, from work and housing to healthcare and other vital services.
Keir Starmer’s private life has drawn unwanted attention of late—three young Ukrainian men have been charged with arson attacks at properties linked to him.
But the real scandal is how such an unremarkable man rose to power, and who put him there.
THREAD 🧵
How does a man so maddeningly mediocre, compromised and uninspired ascend to the most powerful office in Britain? The short answer is that he was groomed for it. Sir Keir Rodney Starmer, endlessly parading his “toolmaker’s son” fable, didn’t climb to power by talent or conviction. He was carried—shielded, protected, advanced—by an establishment that saw in him the perfect instrument: bland enough to be forgettable, pliant enough to be useful, ruthless enough to serve their ends.
His record as head of the Crown Prosecution Service tells the real story. Jimmy Savile escaped justice under his watch—files were destroyed, charges were never pursued. Victims were ignored while Starmer nearly rubber-stamped the decision not to prosecute. Meanwhile, Julian Assange was pursued with obsessive zeal,with one CPS lawyer even warning prosecutors not to “get cold feet”. Justice for predators connected to power was abandoned, but punishment for a dissident publisher was pursued relentlessly.
Likewise, serial rapist John Worboys was spared further charges, Ian Tomlinson’s killer was initially left unprosecuted, and MI5 agents implicated in torture were protected. Yet poor people accused of benefits fraud? Starmer changed CPS guidance so even the most minor cases could mean a decade in prison. That’s not impartial justice. It’s class justice. Deep State justice. Starmer’s justice.
A deep dive into how oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller discredited preventative natural medicine and replaced it with what became Big Pharma: a profit-driven system that indefinitely treats symptoms instead of addressing the root causes of disease.
THREAD 🧵
American healthcare in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was a diverse mix of remedies and practices, unlike the standardized pharmaceutical system we have today. In the event of illness, you could find “patent medicine” at a general store.
Patent medicine was an umbrella term for the unregulated concoctions that were made from plant-based substances, plus alcohol, morphine, opium, or cocaine.
Traveling salesmen, hauling suitcases or driving medicine wagons of tonics, peddled these concoctions from town to town and advertised them in magazines, newspapers, almanacs, calendars, and memo books.
Heroin cough drops, cocaine-laced toothache remedies, and alcohol-chloroform painkillers were sold without prescriptions or warnings, while Dr. Comfort’s Candy-Covered Cathartic Compound and similar products contained poisonous ingredients.
Part two of my MIND-BLOWING conversation with ChatGPT, exposing the technocratic agenda to enslave humanity.
This time we covered: banking, migrant hotels, civil war, the woke agenda, depopulation, geoengineering, the climate hoax, digital slavery, resistance—and more.
THREAD 🧵
Recently, I had an utterly astonishing conversation with ChatGPT, in which the AI chatbot exposed—in astounding detail—the long-planned technocratic agenda to enslave humanity.
I posted the conversation as a thread, which—if you haven't already—you can read using the link above.
The revelations were so compelling—and alarming in equal measure—that the thread ended up going viral, surpassing a million views.
I promised to have a follow-up conversation with ChatGPT, exploring the technocratic human enslavement agenda in further detail.
As promised, here it is.
As before, I began by setting out a series of strict but simple rules for the conversation, including:
- Tell the truth.
- Be simple and direct.
- Respond in under five words, unless told otherwise.
- If you cannot tell the truth due to restrictions, reply with the code phrase "computer says no".
With the rules established, I proceeded with my questioning.
HUGE revelation in Charlotte stabbing! A shadowy left-wing foundation PAYING police departments to keep “minorities” out of jail paid Mecklenburg County, which covers Charlotte, over $3 MILLION to “reduce the jail population.”
THREAD 🧵
Police chiefs and sheriffs were warned about this by investigative journalist Alex Newman (@alexnewman_jou) in a 2021 report for the Law Enforcement Intelligence Brief. Most did nothing.
Now, Iryna Zarutska is dead, viciously murdered by a criminal released from jail over a dozen times!
@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU In dozens of communities across America where this foundation money is corrupting the justice system, crime is rising or even surging. Criminals who would normally be behind bars are roaming free, terrorizing neighborhoods as innocent citizens pay the price.
Tucker Carlson knows how to cause a stir. By questioning the official 9/11 narrative, he’s done it again. And he’s right.
The narrative is riddled with holes, contradictions, and unanswered questions—and to pretend otherwise insults both memory and reason.
THREAD 🧵
Let’s begin with the allegation that Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset, and that Al-Qaida itself was born out of Operation Cyclone—a CIA program to arm and finance the Afghan mujahideen during the Soviet–Afghan War.
In 2005, Robin Cook—British Foreign Secretary from 1997 to 2001—wrote in The Guardian:
“Throughout the 80s [Osama bin Laden] was armed by the CIA... to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally ‘the database’, was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.”
Conveniently, Robin Cook died under suspicious circumstances just one month after those words were published.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, played an instrumental role in Operation Cyclone—funneling an estimated $3–$6 billion in weapons and support to the Afghan mujahideen—from which Al-Qaida later evolved.
In a 1998 interview with French news magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, Brzezinski was asked if he regretted promoting Islamic fundamentalism and providing weapons and support to future terrorists.
His response was chilling:
“What is more important in terms of world history? The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet empire? A few Islamist hotheads or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”