THREAD. It's important for all people of good will to understand the Laken Riley Act before the Senate votes on it tomorrow. It’s unconstitutional. It’s horrific in every word and clause. But there is a deeper, more imminent violence lurking beneath its hate-filled text.
First the background. The Laken Riley Act is unprecedented in modern U.S. history. It requires federal DHS bureaucracy to build billions in new infrastructure to cage any undocumented person *even accused* of petty theft, shoplifting, or several other property crimes.
A key aspect of the law is people are rounded up and put into mass caging facilities (built and usually run for profit) for a mere *accusation.* A person (even a child) need not be convicted, and they are taken from their families and jobs and churches and schools immediately.
Take a look at the monstrous response from “progressive” Democratic @RubenGallego, who is just beginning a six-year term, when asked by local journalists about the shocking requirement that people are detained without any process at all:
It passed the House, with dozens of Democrats voting for it. As usual, there is a lot of misinformation about the true costs. The Laken Riley Act goes too far even for the Biden Administration’’s ICE bureaucrats, some of the most zealous immigration enforcers in U.S. history.
ICE claims it will cost $3.2 billion. This estimate is fanciful, and it doesn’t even begin to think about the costs to local governments. Here’s what one anti-immigration zealot in the Democratic party estimates to be the cost:
But there is something much deeper to consider. Laws like this are not just about the hundreds of thousands of people who will be detained indefinitely, for months and years, solely because they are accused–but not found guilty–of a minor misdemeanor.
Laws like this will infuse everyday life for tens of millions of people with the threat of imminent violence. How?
Because they enable other people to exploit undocumented people and their kids and families. Domestic abusers, employers, bullies at school, cops, etc. Merely *accusing* someone of something now gets them detained indefinitely no matter what.
This threat can be wielded by predators large and small every single moment of every single day. This new power will change so many people's lives.
This is the kind of daily terror, vigilante empowerment, and straight-up chaos that forms the basis of fascist societies and on which the authoritarian project depends.
The threat of imminent destruction becomes an even more imminent fact of everyday life. And it affects anyone who knows, cares about, works with, or is related to someone who doesn’t have papers. And it affects and emboldens predators. And it changes all of us.
The bill is the culmination of three catastrophic trends in contemporary propaganda. First, the manufactured “retail theft” panic. The panic about shoplifting has survived, even after it was uncovered as a lie and the retail industry itself admitted it:
Second, manufactured panic over bail reform. There is a climate-science-like consensus that even short periods of pretrial detention *increases crime* in future and have catastrophic economic/human costs to society. It makes us *less* safe according to overwhelming evidence.
Despite this, media engaged in a years-long panic about “bail reform” that looks a lot like the tobacco industry and fossil fuel industry’s deception. U.S. and Philippines are the only two countries in the world with for-profit bail industry: equalityalec.substack.com/p/the-news-med…
But after the lies were exposed and research showed releasing more people saved communities money and reduced crime, the fear and lies left their mark: the Act inexplicably focuses on pre-conviction detention for minor property crime, even at the expense of crimes like murder.
Third, this is culmination of Democratic Party and mainstream media’s capitulation to the most nativist, xenophobic, inhuman rhetoric of the far right about immigration. The core of it all is the notion that human beings are worth more or less depending on where they are born.
Finally, all of this is unconstitutional under many decades of precedent. Because bodily liberty is a “fundamental” constitutional right, government cannot deprive it without an individualized determination that it is necessary to serve a compelling government interest.
Numerous state and federal courts have overturned attempts at blanket forms of pre-adjudication detention, and even in the immigration context courts have rejected indefinite detention with no process and no ability for individualized findings.
And yet, a small group of private prison officials, surveillance companies, and lots of government bureaucrats are about to make billions of dollars and create permanent new jobs and bureaucracies that will be impossible later to dismantle. All in service of misinformed hate
This could be a moment for leaders to expose hate, misinformation, mean-spirited bullying, and division in service of a passionate and evidence-based articulation of shared prosperity and human flourishing.
The fact that prominent Democrats are joining in the depraved, uninformed, and ignorant chorus to pass this law should be a warning to people of good will. We are becoming an even meaner, more misguided society. There's time to shift course, and to stand up for fellow humans.
Several organizations have made it easy for you to reach out to your senators about this: act.nilc.org/page/77897/act…
Update: senators have rejected amendments to protect children and pregnant women and to restrict to convictions. Instead, almost 20 Dems voted to *expand* the law, including misdemeanor APO. This means any cop in the US could get someone indefinitely detained in the new camps.
APO is one of the most corrupt corners of the punishment bureaucracy. In many places like DC it has been interpreted to mean just resisting a cop, and it’s routinely charged by cops to cover up when they beat someone. Now any cop could decide indefinite immigration detention.
Here’s the text of the amendment adding APO and other crimes. You need only be arrested or charged, not convicted:
UPDATE: voting is happening now, and enough Democrats have already joined Republicans that the filibuster can be broken and this monstrosity will become law.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD. For over a decade, I've been working across the country to challenge unconstitutional cash bail. So, why is Trump trying to entrench it?
The for-profit cash bail industry exists only in U.S. and Philippines. Even though you're presumed innocent, you're stuck in a jail cell while you wait for your day in court if your family doesn't have cash to pay a private company to secure your release.
Basing bodily liberty on a person's access to cash destroys millions of lives. It makes us all less safe. It's unconstitutional. But it makes a lot of people a lot of money, and it gives huge leverage to prosecutors and police to force people to plead guilty in low-level cases.
THREAD. Today's article by New York Times reporter Devlin Barrett is a good example of how bad journalism can normalize authoritarianism. Let's look at a particularly egregious example.
These two paragraphs tell you a lot about the failures of contemporary journalism. Among many problems here, and with the article generally, I will highlight two huge ones for now.
First, through its choice of sources, lack of skepticism, and failure to provide contrary evidence or context, the article suggests that not letting stormtroopers illegally search and brutalize ordinary people "could hamper crime-fighting efforts for years to come."
THREAD. A subtle but pervasive propaganda technique is when the news adopts as the *actual* motive the *stated* motive of people in power.
Nobody with any knowledge or experience thinks Trump is in good faith taking over the DC police and mobilizing the military to “fight crime.” Indeed crime is at historic lows and “violent crime” is down 26% in DC from last year. So, why is the New York Times doing this?
Laundering the real reasons people in power do things by adopting their lies as assumed truth is among the most interesting and dangerous contemporary copaganda techniques. I devote almost entire chapter in the Copaganda book to it.
THREAD. Today's orders by Trump federalizing D.C. police and deploying National Guard in D.C. in response to "out of control" crime are authoritarian. But I want to comment on something subtle lurking beneath the surface.
As with most media/politician talk about "crime," it is completely divorced from reality. D.C. crime is at historic lows. What police call "violent crime" is down 26% since last year. More broadly, it's been at multi-decade, historic lows for years.
So, how is this possible? What lays the groundwork for such ludicrous claims? The news media has been fear-mongering for years. Indeed, in my Copaganda book, I have a very interesting section about prominent Washington Post journalists using this same "out of control" language.
THREAD. A recent poll shows that people in the United States suffer from mass delusion about crime. The results are alarming for Democrats. It should be a massive scandal for mainstream news, and it's a pillar of the authoritarian zeitgeist.
Only 9% of respondents correctly answered that murder rates in the U.S. have decreased a lot since 1990. today.yougov.com/topics/politic…
This is just simple "flat-earther" stuff. But it continues the broader fear-based delusion that has been gripping the population for years across a range of crime issues.
The level of ignorance among liberal pundits about surveillance technology, police violence, and authoritarianism is astonishing. Just no effort to understand important issues before commenting on them.
The idea that the problem with what ICE is doing now is that it lacks hundreds of millions of dollars for surveillance technology is utterly a wild thing for someone to utter in public. Just an incredible thing to focus liberal energy on.