SCOTUS notes the parties' agreement that there were at least *some* indicted acts that may face prosecution. supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
Core official acts get absolute immunity, while non-core official acts might or might not get absolute immunity.
(Maybe my article hasn't become obsolete after all! I argue absolute immunity for all official acts, though I may have defined those acts differently from SCOTUS.) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Many twitter experts said that criminal prosecution was LESS dangerous than civil liability. So, they said, civil immunity could not imply criminal immunity.
I'm glad to see SCOTUS recognize the obvious -- being thrown in jail is more dangerous than being asked to pay damages.