Arsenal's press against Spurs last night was excellent
Well drilled and with intensity, they continuously locked Spurs into their left-hand side and won the ball back or created dangerous situations.
Concern for Spurs? They didn't adjust their build-up to counter it.
THREAD🧵
Arsenal adopted a man-to-man press with Timber leaving his right-back position (and +1 on the defensive line) to jump onto Spence at left-back.
The roles within this press are defined in the image below.
Havertz would always try to force play to the Arsenal right with pressure on the goalkeeper marking Dragusin.
Odegaard, Rice and Partey locked onto the Spurs midfield players to prevent any link passes the player Havertz had left (Dragusin)
You can see here the risk involved to find the spare player.
Arsenal have Spurs where they want them.
With this man-to-man press, you can see what Arsenal's defensive line looks like.
3v3, Spurs didn't manipulate this possible advantage. The longer pass into Kulusevski could have been a strong option.
Spurs want to find the spare player in the build-up, but Arsenal are prepared for this. Odegaard marks in fornt of Bissouma in this example.
This will force play into the LCB (Gray) and make play predictable for Arsenal.
The only joy Spurs had with the link pass to find the spare player was when Partey didn't go tight enough from his deeper position.
The same again, Maddison drops deeper to link play and Spurs can build from the back.
Arsenal generally got the press right.
It was a slight shift away from Odegaard leading the press on the front line but he was still dictating with his tactical understanding.
Here he's telling Sterling to get ready to go onto Gray.
We lost count of the number of times Arsenal locked Spurs into the Arsenal right hand-side.
Forcing play into this position, they turned the ball over and ensured Spurs could not build any progressive attacks.
Nowhere to go as Spurs are locked in.
The concern for Spurs in this. At no point did they adjust.
We want to highlight Brighton. Arsenal tried to lock Brighton into one side and it looked to be working.
A slightly different pressing strategy but looking for the same outcome.
Within 5 minutes, Brighton adjusted. Dropping a CM into the defensive line prevented them from being locked into one side.
Arteta adjusted to a full man-to-man press but Brighton simply went over it.
Two managers constantly looking to give their team the edge.
This was the most disappointing part of Spur's game last night. At no time did they adjust, and they kept playing into the Arsenal trap.
Arteta would have been asking for more of the same for the whole game.
The solutions?
Spurs had joy with wide rotations. It's a usual pattern of their play, but they stopped doing it after Arsenal caught them out. Without it, they became predictable.
Pushing Spence higher and rotating asks more questions about the Timber role.
Another possible solution is the positioning of Gray (move more central) and Spence (drop lower). Pushing the midfield higher would enable the back three to then divide the press of Sterling and Havertz and create a 4v2 with the goalkeeper
This creates a larger distance for Timber to cover. If he jumps early, the longer pass into the equal numbers on the frontline has to be the option.
The potential Spurs solutions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Arsenal hit PSV Eindhoven for SEVEN last night as the Dutch team couldn’t live with the fluidity of Arteta’s team.
A thread covering🧵
- Arsenal overloading the midfield
- PSV unable to deal with Arsenal fluidity and rotations
- Potential PSV solutions
Arsenal shifted from their default 4-3-3 when in possession to overload the centre of the pitch with four players.
PSV looked to keep a +1 on the defensive line with Til (20) and De Jong (9) performing dual roles at the top end of the pitch to avoid Arsenal creating a spare player. The rest of the team man-marked.
Last night, there were some great comparisons on defending the box and the structure to reduce the risk.
Liverpool's first goal - defending at one end.
- Van Dijk has been dragged out of position
- Konate picks up optimal position to defend front zone
- Trent attaches himself to Konate (3 yards) to negate any low ball reaching a Newcastle player.
17 seconds later.
- Schar is dragged out of position
- Burn picks up optimal position for defending the front zone
- Tonali drops onto the same line as Burn, leaving space for a low pass to a Liverpool player (Szobaszlai scores)
Liverpool second goal
- Burn dragged out of position
- Schar picks up the optimal position for defending the front zone
- Guimaraes doesn't attach to Schar and leaves space for the low pass and first-time finish.
Ruben Amorim tweaked his system against Spurs but was left with the same problems.
Here, we take a look at
- Centre-backs unwilling and unable to jump
- Lack of aggression from wing-backs
- How the forwards can make play predictable
🧵THREAD
Amorim’s system change looked to be a 5-4-1/5-3-2 with Zirkzee at the top of the diamond midfield and joining Hojulnd on the forward line.
Bruno Fernandes played to the right of the diamond. Garnacho to the left.
The confusion in the defensive roles was apparent from the first minute.
On the left-hand side, Dorgu was conservative with his press, which left himself and De Ligt marking the same player. This allowed Spurs to switch play easily.