Arsenal's press against Spurs last night was excellent
Well drilled and with intensity, they continuously locked Spurs into their left-hand side and won the ball back or created dangerous situations.
Concern for Spurs? They didn't adjust their build-up to counter it.
THREAD🧵
Arsenal adopted a man-to-man press with Timber leaving his right-back position (and +1 on the defensive line) to jump onto Spence at left-back.
The roles within this press are defined in the image below.
Havertz would always try to force play to the Arsenal right with pressure on the goalkeeper marking Dragusin.
Odegaard, Rice and Partey locked onto the Spurs midfield players to prevent any link passes the player Havertz had left (Dragusin)
You can see here the risk involved to find the spare player.
Arsenal have Spurs where they want them.
With this man-to-man press, you can see what Arsenal's defensive line looks like.
3v3, Spurs didn't manipulate this possible advantage. The longer pass into Kulusevski could have been a strong option.
Spurs want to find the spare player in the build-up, but Arsenal are prepared for this. Odegaard marks in fornt of Bissouma in this example.
This will force play into the LCB (Gray) and make play predictable for Arsenal.
The only joy Spurs had with the link pass to find the spare player was when Partey didn't go tight enough from his deeper position.
The same again, Maddison drops deeper to link play and Spurs can build from the back.
Arsenal generally got the press right.
It was a slight shift away from Odegaard leading the press on the front line but he was still dictating with his tactical understanding.
Here he's telling Sterling to get ready to go onto Gray.
We lost count of the number of times Arsenal locked Spurs into the Arsenal right hand-side.
Forcing play into this position, they turned the ball over and ensured Spurs could not build any progressive attacks.
Nowhere to go as Spurs are locked in.
The concern for Spurs in this. At no point did they adjust.
We want to highlight Brighton. Arsenal tried to lock Brighton into one side and it looked to be working.
A slightly different pressing strategy but looking for the same outcome.
Within 5 minutes, Brighton adjusted. Dropping a CM into the defensive line prevented them from being locked into one side.
Arteta adjusted to a full man-to-man press but Brighton simply went over it.
Two managers constantly looking to give their team the edge.
This was the most disappointing part of Spur's game last night. At no time did they adjust, and they kept playing into the Arsenal trap.
Arteta would have been asking for more of the same for the whole game.
The solutions?
Spurs had joy with wide rotations. It's a usual pattern of their play, but they stopped doing it after Arsenal caught them out. Without it, they became predictable.
Pushing Spence higher and rotating asks more questions about the Timber role.
Another possible solution is the positioning of Gray (move more central) and Spence (drop lower). Pushing the midfield higher would enable the back three to then divide the press of Sterling and Havertz and create a 4v2 with the goalkeeper
This creates a larger distance for Timber to cover. If he jumps early, the longer pass into the equal numbers on the frontline has to be the option.
The potential Spurs solutions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A quick thread on the in-possession structure of England and other successful European teams.
Starting with the deep three-player connection (CBs and DM)
- Providing the base for recycling the ball
- CB's stepping in if the free player, DM stepping out to cover
- Base of rest defence structure. Horizontal centre-backs positioning offering central channel cover
Moving onto the wide connections
- Providing beyond (over) the defensive line positioning and runs, below the defensive line (through) and beside (around) the defensive line options
- Freedom to rotate but fill one of the above roles
- Below option forms half space rest defence
Liverpool, to counter the Palace 3-4-3, made some untypical tactical moves which ultimately cost them.
Let's take a deeper look at it. 🧵
First, it's essential to share context.
The game was an even one, Liverpool nullified Palace's threat for a lot of the game, but when they couldn't - BIG chances.
Arne Slot
'We are not conceding a lot of chances, but we are conceding a lot of goals'
The defensive set-up from Slot was the reasoning behind this. In organised defending, despite unconventional roles for Kerkez, Jones and Gakpo, they looked solid.
The problem with unconventional roles always comes in the transition.
A few observations from the Liverpool game yesterday. Track these to see how they develop.
Salah, playing with Frimpong, is certainly going to feature more inside. They will rotate, but Salah positioned himself in a box midfield with Frimpong holding the width.
The double pivot.
Sbozoszlai worked alongside Gravenberch to try and provide central progression from the second build-up line. Both players would look to build through and then offer around options if they couldn't progress centrally.
Away from the 3-2 build-up, Kerkez and Sbozoszlai would rotate.
With Kerkez higher and holding the width, Wirtz dropped into the double pivot, and Gakpo moved inside.
Or simply, Kerkez held the Sbozoszlai position inside.
We put a post out yesterday about Chelsea having 25 attacking transitions in the first half and completing 18 of these with a pass into their forward players within 3-5 passes.
Before we cover tactics, it's essential to appreciate the energy and intensity Chelsea brought to the final. The success they had in the first 10 minutes fed that energy
“I think we won the game in the first 10 minutes. The message before the game was to make them understand that we were here to win. I think in those first 10 minutes, the team was there—it probably set the tone for the game.
Chelsea set up in a 4-4-2 press with Enzo joining Pedro on the first pressing line.
Palmer started in a deeper position, ready to jump if the ball was played to the left centre back position.
Chelsea looked to keep a +1 on the defensive line.