Tactx Profile picture
Jan 16 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Arsenal's press against Spurs last night was excellent

Well drilled and with intensity, they continuously locked Spurs into their left-hand side and won the ball back or created dangerous situations.

Concern for Spurs? They didn't adjust their build-up to counter it.

THREAD🧵
Arsenal adopted a man-to-man press with Timber leaving his right-back position (and +1 on the defensive line) to jump onto Spence at left-back.

The roles within this press are defined in the image below. Image
Havertz would always try to force play to the Arsenal right with pressure on the goalkeeper marking Dragusin.

Odegaard, Rice and Partey locked onto the Spurs midfield players to prevent any link passes the player Havertz had left (Dragusin) Image
You can see here the risk involved to find the spare player.

Arsenal have Spurs where they want them. Image
With this man-to-man press, you can see what Arsenal's defensive line looks like.

3v3, Spurs didn't manipulate this possible advantage. The longer pass into Kulusevski could have been a strong option. Image
Spurs want to find the spare player in the build-up, but Arsenal are prepared for this. Odegaard marks in fornt of Bissouma in this example.

This will force play into the LCB (Gray) and make play predictable for Arsenal. Image
The only joy Spurs had with the link pass to find the spare player was when Partey didn't go tight enough from his deeper position. Image
The same again, Maddison drops deeper to link play and Spurs can build from the back. Image
Arsenal generally got the press right.

It was a slight shift away from Odegaard leading the press on the front line but he was still dictating with his tactical understanding.

Here he's telling Sterling to get ready to go onto Gray. Image
We lost count of the number of times Arsenal locked Spurs into the Arsenal right hand-side.

Forcing play into this position, they turned the ball over and ensured Spurs could not build any progressive attacks. Image
Nowhere to go as Spurs are locked in. Image
The concern for Spurs in this. At no point did they adjust.

We want to highlight Brighton. Arsenal tried to lock Brighton into one side and it looked to be working.

A slightly different pressing strategy but looking for the same outcome. Image
Within 5 minutes, Brighton adjusted. Dropping a CM into the defensive line prevented them from being locked into one side. Image
Image
Arteta adjusted to a full man-to-man press but Brighton simply went over it.

Two managers constantly looking to give their team the edge. Image
This was the most disappointing part of Spur's game last night. At no time did they adjust, and they kept playing into the Arsenal trap.

Arteta would have been asking for more of the same for the whole game.
The solutions?

Spurs had joy with wide rotations. It's a usual pattern of their play, but they stopped doing it after Arsenal caught them out. Without it, they became predictable.

Pushing Spence higher and rotating asks more questions about the Timber role. Image
Image
Another possible solution is the positioning of Gray (move more central) and Spence (drop lower). Pushing the midfield higher would enable the back three to then divide the press of Sterling and Havertz and create a 4v2 with the goalkeeper

This creates a larger distance for Timber to cover. If he jumps early, the longer pass into the equal numbers on the frontline has to be the option.
The potential Spurs solutions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tactx

Tactx Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Tactx_

Mar 5
Arsenal hit PSV Eindhoven for SEVEN last night as the Dutch team couldn’t live with the fluidity of Arteta’s team.

A thread covering🧵
- Arsenal overloading the midfield
- PSV unable to deal with Arsenal fluidity and rotations
- Potential PSV solutions Image
Arsenal shifted from their default 4-3-3 when in possession to overload the centre of the pitch with four players. Image
PSV looked to keep a +1 on the defensive line with Til (20) and De Jong (9) performing dual roles at the top end of the pitch to avoid Arsenal creating a spare player. The rest of the team man-marked.

This was a huge performance problem all night. Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 27
Quick thread on an undervalued structure 🧵

Last night, there were some great comparisons on defending the box and the structure to reduce the risk.

Liverpool's first goal - defending at one end.
- Van Dijk has been dragged out of position
- Konate picks up optimal position to defend front zone
- Trent attaches himself to Konate (3 yards) to negate any low ball reaching a Newcastle player.Image
17 seconds later.

- Schar is dragged out of position
- Burn picks up optimal position for defending the front zone
- Tonali drops onto the same line as Burn, leaving space for a low pass to a Liverpool player (Szobaszlai scores) Image
Liverpool second goal
- Burn dragged out of position
- Schar picks up the optimal position for defending the front zone
- Guimaraes doesn't attach to Schar and leaves space for the low pass and first-time finish. Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 24
A short thread on the Liverpool set play that sent them on their way to a win at the Etihad.

Arne Slot explained how the coaches identified the weakness and created the set play the day before the Man City game.

So what did they identify? Image
Man City look to mark zonally with SIX players.

The six look to cover critical areas in the six-yard box where most first-contact goals are scored. Image
With SIX zonal players, Man City has FOUR players to man-mark.

These players are highlighted here on the edge of the six-yard box. Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 18
Ruben Amorim tweaked his system against Spurs but was left with the same problems.

Here, we take a look at
- Centre-backs unwilling and unable to jump
- Lack of aggression from wing-backs
- How the forwards can make play predictable

🧵THREAD

Amorim’s system change looked to be a 5-4-1/5-3-2 with Zirkzee at the top of the diamond midfield and joining Hojulnd on the forward line.

Bruno Fernandes played to the right of the diamond. Garnacho to the left. Image
The confusion in the defensive roles was apparent from the first minute.

On the left-hand side, Dorgu was conservative with his press, which left himself and De Ligt marking the same player. This allowed Spurs to switch play easily. Image
Read 25 tweets
Feb 17
System match-ups provide the out-of-possession side with players in close proximity to the opponents individual players.

Amorim tweaked his 3-4-3 and went with a diamond in a narrow midfield. This took away any player in close proximity to the Spurs left-back area. Image
Fernandes was asked to jump into wide positions from his position on the right of the diamond.

Maddison would rotate with Spence to allow Spurs to get their talented player on the ball. Image
Fernandes covered the large distances.

Mazraoui and Dalot didn't get their communication right.

Mazraoui wasn't comfortable jumping onto Spence, and the Spurs rotation allows easy progression.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 12
Man City - Real Madrid Analysis

🗒️Pep's tactical surprise
🗒️The role of John Stones
🗒️Madrid's left-hand side threat
🗒️How the game swung Madrid's way

🧵THREAD ⬇️ Image
Pep started with five centre-backs in the team and looked to build with these players in a 2-3 formation.

Real Madrid lined up in a narrow 4-4-2 out of possession. Image
The system of City drew Real Madrid into a narrow pressing shape and confusion over whose role it was to pick up the Akanji/Stones/Gvardiol trio.

The unconventional shape provided questions for the Real Madrid defensive structure. Image
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(