Arsenal's press against Spurs last night was excellent
Well drilled and with intensity, they continuously locked Spurs into their left-hand side and won the ball back or created dangerous situations.
Concern for Spurs? They didn't adjust their build-up to counter it.
THREAD🧵
Arsenal adopted a man-to-man press with Timber leaving his right-back position (and +1 on the defensive line) to jump onto Spence at left-back.
The roles within this press are defined in the image below.
Havertz would always try to force play to the Arsenal right with pressure on the goalkeeper marking Dragusin.
Odegaard, Rice and Partey locked onto the Spurs midfield players to prevent any link passes the player Havertz had left (Dragusin)
You can see here the risk involved to find the spare player.
Arsenal have Spurs where they want them.
With this man-to-man press, you can see what Arsenal's defensive line looks like.
3v3, Spurs didn't manipulate this possible advantage. The longer pass into Kulusevski could have been a strong option.
Spurs want to find the spare player in the build-up, but Arsenal are prepared for this. Odegaard marks in fornt of Bissouma in this example.
This will force play into the LCB (Gray) and make play predictable for Arsenal.
The only joy Spurs had with the link pass to find the spare player was when Partey didn't go tight enough from his deeper position.
The same again, Maddison drops deeper to link play and Spurs can build from the back.
Arsenal generally got the press right.
It was a slight shift away from Odegaard leading the press on the front line but he was still dictating with his tactical understanding.
Here he's telling Sterling to get ready to go onto Gray.
We lost count of the number of times Arsenal locked Spurs into the Arsenal right hand-side.
Forcing play into this position, they turned the ball over and ensured Spurs could not build any progressive attacks.
Nowhere to go as Spurs are locked in.
The concern for Spurs in this. At no point did they adjust.
We want to highlight Brighton. Arsenal tried to lock Brighton into one side and it looked to be working.
A slightly different pressing strategy but looking for the same outcome.
Within 5 minutes, Brighton adjusted. Dropping a CM into the defensive line prevented them from being locked into one side.
Arteta adjusted to a full man-to-man press but Brighton simply went over it.
Two managers constantly looking to give their team the edge.
This was the most disappointing part of Spur's game last night. At no time did they adjust, and they kept playing into the Arsenal trap.
Arteta would have been asking for more of the same for the whole game.
The solutions?
Spurs had joy with wide rotations. It's a usual pattern of their play, but they stopped doing it after Arsenal caught them out. Without it, they became predictable.
Pushing Spence higher and rotating asks more questions about the Timber role.
Another possible solution is the positioning of Gray (move more central) and Spence (drop lower). Pushing the midfield higher would enable the back three to then divide the press of Sterling and Havertz and create a 4v2 with the goalkeeper
This creates a larger distance for Timber to cover. If he jumps early, the longer pass into the equal numbers on the frontline has to be the option.
The potential Spurs solutions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brentford played with the most compact 4-4-2 low block you will see all season.
The problem with it against top teams is that there is no escape.
Want to play short passes to link before springing the counter attack? Arsenal will steal the ball back immediately.
This was the case for the first goal.
Brentford can easily end up in a 7-3 or 8-2 formation when the 4-4-2 lines are so compact.
Brentford won possession three times from this situation, but the short counter-pressing spaces that Arsenal have created gives no chance of a Brentford counter-attack
Amorim’s 3-4-3 was tested last night against a well-coached Newcastle side that dismantled the structure in the first 30 minutes of the game.
Tactical thread 🧵(Rated 18 for Man United fans)
Animations of the systems and the related performance problems.
Amorim is a manager who wants his team to play on the front foot. We highlighted this during our analysis of Sporting Lisbon, which you find at the link below.
You can see this in the initial moments, and this is what we have come to expect from Amorim’s front players. Amad and Zirkzee join Hojlund to press high. Eriksen and Casemiro back them up.
The problem is that half the team is on the front foot. The other half is pinned. The wing-backs don’t jump. Both Newcastle full-backs are free.
If you want to press man-to-man, they will bypass the press. Low risk, high reward.
Tactically, the players recognise this. Here, Trent sees the opposite full-back, Spence, jump to press.
There's an easy pass to the goalkeeper to retain possession, but Trent knows LIverpool have equal numbers on the Spurs defensive line as Spence has jumped.
It turns out they have a better scenario.
Bissouma and Sarr leave Szoboszlai, and this turns the situation into a 4v3 in Liverpool's favour.
For all of the in-possession criticism of Russel Martin and Southampton, his out-of-possession tactics ultimately led to the result before his sacking.
Let's take a deeper look at Southampton's OOP tactics.
THREAD🧵
Southampton lined up with a 4-4-2 diamond.
With split strikers, Southampton looked to press high.
From the 1st minute, we see a problem.
Sulemana closes Forster down; the goalkeeper makes a simple link pass to get his centre back on the ball. Line one of the press is broke.
Spurs now have 4v3 on the midfield line with the familiar site of their full-backs inverting.
Sarr rotates with Spence and they combine as Maddison makes his move untracked off the back of the midfield line.
A tactical analysis of how to dominate against a 4-4-2 press.
A DETAILED THREAD on the current 4-4-2 pressing trend and the structure that Leeds used to exploit it.
Let's look at the default shape of Leeds and Middlesbrough.
Leeds started in a 4-2-3-1, which would shift into a 3-3-1-3 when in possession.
Middlesbrough started in a 4-2-3-1 and shifting into a 4-4-2 out of possession.
The shifts allowed Leeds to dominate.
A view of the Leeds shift in possession
- One midfielder drops into the defensive line
- Other midfielders play on same vertical line at different heights (creating a 1-1)
- Full-backs provide the width
- Wide forwards invert