Critical Race Theory has many central arguments. People have forgotten them, but they would be wise to refresh because 1.) CRT is still everywhere, especially education 2.) The framework is being adopted by fringe elements on the Right that will subvert MAGA.
A 🧵
1. Racism is normal, not aberrational
CRT argues racism is the norm because it's embedded in the very fabric of society. There is no such thing as a "not racist" person.
2. Interest Convergence
Racial progress often aligns with the interests of the powerful. Change happens when it benefits those in power, not solely because of moral or ethical concerns.
3. Critique of Liberalism
CRT challenges liberal ideas like colorblindness, incremental change, equality theory, and neutral principles of constitutional law. It argues these approaches ignore/run cover for systemic inequities and maintain the unjust status quo.
4. Intersectionality
CRT recognizes that race intersects with other social identities, such as gender, class, and sexuality, producing unique and cumulative forms of discrimination and oppression.
5. Lived Experience/Standpoint Epistemology
Lived experiences of marginalized groups, particularly people of color, are essential to understanding racism and should be prioritized in research and analysis as "more true" than competing claims.
CRT reinterprets historical narratives to expose how race and racism have shaped society, challenging traditional accounts that minimize or omit these dynamics.
7. Structural Determinism
Social structures and institutions often perpetuate racial hierarchies, limiting the ability of reforms to produce meaningful change without addressing systemic foundations.
8. Whiteness as Property
Whiteness is treated as a form of private property that provides privileges and benefits to those who possess it, reinforcing inequality.
9. Commitment to Activism/"Social Justice"
CRT attempts to dismantle racial hierarchies and promote equity through "transformative" action and scholarship.
The fringe but growing Woke Right movement is adopting many elements of the CRT framework.
They say yes, racism is the normal state of affairs, and that's a good thing. Whereas CRT reifies race for political purposes, this fringe group does the same.
This movement also argues that things only improve for ethnic groups or white people when interests converge with the powerful and privileged. Generally, this argument culminates on the conspiracy of "Jewish Supremacy" rather than "White Supremacy."
The Woke Right critique the "very foundations of the liberal order," just as the Critical Race Theorists do.
The Woke Right, in essence, say, "Yes. You're right. Liberalism is the problem!"
This group hasn't gone fully intersectional yet, but they will. Imagine "Poor "heritage American" Catholic in the Midwest vs. Wealthy descendent of German immigrant Protestant in the Rust Belt."
Who has "more privilege"? Who needs more equity?
The Woke Right embraces standpoint epistemology because they believe "the truth" is hidden from them. Their truth holds more weight. Their perception is reality; their perception constitutes reality.
They've embraced the same "critical methods" of the CRTs.
They're revising history as we speak. "Hitler was the good guy!" etc.
They think their lives are structurally determinate, which is why they are left only with the job at Panda Express.
They do view "whiteness" as a property that only belongs to white people.
They're utterly committed to a revolution.
CRT is wicked and evil. We must reject not just the game being played, but the board on which it's played - heretical dialectical idealist nonsense.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is 5th-Generation Political Warfare. I talk quite a bit about it because very few know what it is or how it works. We must understand it to deliver on the overwhelming mandate America just handed Trump.
Let's dive into an example of what it looks like on the "right." 🧵
A 5GW psyop usually begins with a seemingly grassroots online movement promoting things like "authentic conservatism."
It uses vague, non-threatening language that appeals to traditional values and everyday people frustrated with the way things are going.
But it's all a façade.
A fake account network is deployed. Bots and paid influencers amplify the message. Memes, tweets, and TikToks flood the timeline.
These posts highlight relatable frustrations (e.g., rising costs, cultural decay) and tie them to the movement.
Some argue America was created for an ethnic group. This claim doesn’t align with the Founders’ principles or historical evidence. Let’s examine why. 🧵
America’s founding documents focus on universal principles, not ethnic identity. The Declaration of Independence states, "all men are created equal," with Rights endowed by their Creator—not by race or ethnicity.
The U.S. Constitution doesn’t privilege any ethnicity. It establishes a government to protect liberty and justice for all, emphasizing individual rights over group identity.
The fact that many have smuggled in collectivism through mystifying jurisprudence doesn't negate this.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971) is one of the most influential U.S. Supreme Court decisions in employment law. It introduced the concept of "disparate impact," and its implications reach far beyond the workplace. Here's why it was a mistake. 🧵
In Griggs, Duke Power required employees to pass IQ tests or have a high school diploma to qualify for certain jobs. The Court ruled these requirements were discriminatory because they disproportionately excluded black workers, even without discriminatory intent.
The Court held that practices neutral on their face could still violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 if they resulted in disparate outcomes for protected groups, unless the employer could show the practice was "job-related and consistent with business necessity."
How did we end up with these massive, unreadable omnibus bills in Congress?
Let’s break it down. 🧵
Omnibus bills are huge legislative packages that combine unrelated provisions into one bill. They often span thousands of pages. Most members of Congress can't/don’t read them before voting.
Insane.
Congress wasn’t always this dysfunctional. For most of its history, it followed a system called "regular order." Each area of government was funded by a separate appropriations bill.
I’ve seen various content claiming that “Woke Right” is a stupid name because “Woke” just means “awakened to and forwarding critiques of social power."
Woke is much more than that. I can't tell if they still don't know that, or they're aware...
Let's define "Woke" again.
🧵
“Critical Constructivism” is the technical term for Woke. “Critical” for the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt school and offshoots (there’s a million “critical theories” now, Critical Race Theory and Queer Theory being the ones people are most familiar with).
To quote Woke educator Joe Kincheloe, "Critical constructivism is grounded on the Frankfurt School's formulation of critical theory."
This Woke Right conspiracy theory is a very compelling narrative based on a lot of truth that it distorts to its own purposes.
This is one of their central arguments, as I see it, presented without personal comment. Feedback welcome.
The “post-war liberal consensus."
🧵
After World War II, the Allies wanted to prevent another Nazi Germany situation. They wanted to combat the rise of one or more powerful and aggressive hyper religious, nationalistic, and ethnocentric nations.
So, they reached a consensus – “We’re not doing that again. Technology keeps advancing, and the next time might be our last.”