A thread on Arne Slot's philosophy and tactical approach at Liverpool.
Liverpool's press can be exploited at times because they prefer to stay zonal as opposed to jumping man-to-man, but when they get it right it is the optimal way of pressing.
Why?
They apply near max pressure on the ball whilst maintaining a +1 in defence.
SO hard to beat that.
This is it.
Szoboszlai stands in between both #6's with Diaz & Salah ready to press the centre backs.
When the ball is passed to one side, Trent pushes high, Szoboszlai presses the ball-side #6, Diaz stops the switch, Gakpo tucks in so he can manage the far-side #6 + fullback.
Liverpool trap Brentford on one side and are prepared to manage the situation if Brentford try to switch play.
Not to mention that if Brentford try to play over the press or through the lines, Liverpool have a +1 at the back, and that +1 is Virgil van Dijk.
So, even if you do beat Liverpool's initials lines of pressure, it is difficult to exploit them in that self-created transitional moment because they have some of the best defenders in the sport but also because they have a numerical advantage.
Not to forget that when the press is bypassed, these guys sprint recover.
That zonal approach can be exploited, though, particularly in the mid-block where Liverpool have been hurt by the likes of Chelsea & United.
So Slot needs to improve that, but outside of that so, so good.
It's in these defensive moments where the Slot/Klopp comparisons make sense.
Offensively, though, we can see a blend of Pep and Ancelotti. Heck, even De Zerbi.
Here we see a De Zerbi-esque 4-2-4 build-up where Liverpool use 3rd man patterns or play over vs the man-to-man press.
In the final third, we see more of Pep.
Triangles on the sides with the fullback, ball-side #8, and wingers have license to interchange and combine with each other.
Optimal for combination play, but the deep-lying guys on each side help keep the block compact in transition.
And the reason I talk about Ancelotti when I mention Slot is because of how he is fluid to the demands of his elite players.
Trent is at his best as a deep-lying fullback facing the play?
Let's play him there then.
How many coaches do we see use a flat 4-3-3 nowadays?!
Slot has got the absolute maximum out of this Liverpool team and he has done it by implementing his own stamp & style on things whilst adapting to the elite quality & depth he has at his disposal.
So far, he has done a flawless job.
Hard to see anybody stop this Liverpool team.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The new iteration of Pep Guardiola's Manchester City have some clear issues:
💎 Despite being a top coach, Lijnders' defensive idea has not worked whatsoever with this group of players.
💎 Lack physicality to lead the press and win duels.
💎 Missing top-end quality in key areas.
In possession, nobody doubts the quality of Guardiola's structure.
The idea almost always makes total sense.
City build in a 4-3-3 (or a 4-2-4 if Bernardo drops deep) before morphing into a 3-2-5 with Stones inverted into midfield.
Structurally, absolutely no problems here…
But compare the quality Pep had in his previous teams vs now:
Donnarumma is worse technically than Ederson.
Oscar Bobb is not as threatening as Mahrez.
Savinho is not as threatening as Grealish (the treble winning version).
Foden is not De Bruyne.
Enzo Maresca may be unlucky in certain regards because the expectations at Chelsea are to compete with Liverpool and Arsenal when his squad is quite simply not on that level (the XI is, but the depth behind it is not), but he can't be excused for Chelsea's mid-block or mentality.
Chelsea dominate the ball in most games they play.
And they are incredibly well set-up tactically when they do have the ball.
For example, against José Mourinho's Benfica, Chelsea set up in a 2-3-5 shape with both fullbacks inverted
Defending against teams who use a box midfield or a 3-2 build-up shape in open play.
Liverpool only press with 4 against Palace's 5.
Good teams manipulate this to get time on the ball before playing vertically through Liverpool's block 👇
Arne Slot's idea in this moment is to trap the opposition to one side whilst leaving the far-side opponent unmarked.
This can work, on occasion, and it often works from situations like goal kicks because Liverpool can position themselves where they want from restart moments.
But, in open play, the opposition can often use the overload to their advantage, even more so if they get the goalkeeper involved to create a 6v4.
Simple switches of play or short & sharp combination play amongst the 3-2 shape can get guys like Wharton facing forwards with time.
Xabi Alonso has created the most tactically complete Real Madrid that I have ever seen.
4-2-4 build-up, 3-2-5 attack, man-to-man pressing from the goal kick, & most importantly Madrid are getting effective pressure on the ball in open play!
A breakdown of the new-look Madrid 👇
Alonso has implemented some 🔝 in-possession dynamics.
A positional idea but fluidity/freedom is encouraged within the framework.
For example, Tchouaméni (one of the most intelligent players alive) has taken up a Kroos-esque role in the left half space with Carreras pushing on.
With Tchouaméni dropping outside the shape, he becomes hard to pick up within the opposition's press but it also creates another number higher on the left hand-side of Madrid's attack.
So, instead of attacking with only 3 in a triangle, Tchouaméni makes it a quartet.
Newcastle-Barcelona is another clear example of why you need to actually watch games as opposed to seeking narratives through X.
Newcastle could have been 3-0 up inside 30 minutes & finished the game with more xG even though they often failed to get shots off.
Barca suffered 👇
Newcastle primarily played direct to use their superior physicality to bully Barca (often via restarts), but they also had some superb routines to bypass Barca's aggressive press.
Here, Martín jumps, Trippier sets inside, Elanga comes short, Gordon receives 1v1.
TOP automatism.
Another one.
Barca jump man-to-man, Livramento plays around the corner into the feet of Joelinton, and Newcastle are in a great position to find the space in behind Barca's offside trap.
Plus, when they did find the space beyond (often through Elanga), they were not clinical.
Thomas Frank and Spurs main problem in the 4-3-3 👇
The idea is to create a 3v2 in the first line against a 4-4-2, whether that be with the #6 dropping low or staying in the #6.
But the wide triangles have 2 wide with 1 inside.
Hard to combine like that.
Low AND high width means your team plays in straight lines.
What is the winger meant to do here?
Spence passes to Simons, Pepe back-presses to cut the angle off to Spence, and Simons is stuck with his back to goal with a defender behind AND in front of him.
He loses the ball..
This was a consistent theme for Spurs on both sides.
Even if the fullbacks wants to play in behind for the winger it is much more difficult to play straight balls beyond the defensive line than it is to play an angled one.